• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was reform of the Soviet System possible or even advisable? Consider either the policies of Khrushchev or Gorbachev.

Extracts from this document...


Was reform of the Soviet System possible or even advisable? Consider either the policies of Khrushchev or Gorbachev. For some Gorbachev is a hero because he bought an unworkable and corrupt system to an end, and for others, he is a traitor, because he undermined a stable, ongoing system, which could have reformed itself. When Gorbachev came into power, he introduced reforms such as perestroika (recon- structuring) and glasnost (openness). Perestroika is best understood as a combination of policies put forward by the Gorbachev leadership during the 27th Party Congress in 1986 until 1989. In the economy, the aim was to introduce elements of market mechanism, and a variety of forms of ownership and in this way the reform of the Soviet Union was advisable as it gave people the opportunity of owning something, which would therefore make profit for them. In the political sphere, the vision was of a reformed Communist Party, which again was advisable as there was much corruption within the party that needed to be rid of. The party would firmly still be in control, but a party, whose officials both at central and local level would, to some degree, be accountable to elected bodies. ...read more.


The Congress was to elect a Constitutional Court, with the authority to oversee the legality of any constitutional amendments. There was to be a combination of the party's institutional power and authority with a new basis of legitimacy: electoral accountability. This shows it should not have been advisable because if the party was to retain its power and authority, it was difficult to see what the purpose of the legislature was. Gorbachev's policies of reform, especially glasnost created problems as I have mentioned. It was reflected again when in March 1989, elections for the CPD were held. In Moscow, Boris Yeltsin stood. His calls for an end to the special privileges and his attacks upon the party apparatus, his ability to establish a rapport with a crowd made him the people's hero in Russia. The party apparatus did not know how to fight an election campaign as it never had to before and this tells us that Gorbachev's reforms at the time were not possible and certainly not advisable. One could say the establishment of the CPD was not advisable as political authority began to slip away from the leading party bodies to the CPD. ...read more.


The very forces Gorbachev hoped to use to implement his reforms, the Party and the Ministerial bureaucracy, resisted his policies. Gorbachev realised the extent of the tasks he was undertaking, but he did not realise the complexity and overestimated the extent to which he had control over events. He introduced democratisation that freed him from the apparat but he created an opposition that constrained him in introducing more reforms. By introducing perestroika and glasnost, he accelerated the system. To conduct the reforms which he intended to, most would argue that an authoritarian system is ideal so Gorbachev did well in introducing perestroika but he should not have introduced glasnost as it brought down authority as it gave people to express dissatisfaction. But having said that, the reasons for the fall of the Soviet Union was not just due to Gorbachev's reforms, but also because there was a decline in productivity which was depressing the economy and reducing living standards. The size of the Soviet economy masked major distortions, above all the distribution between defence and consumer goods, raw materials and energy extraction, so in this way reforms were advisable as reform of the economy and the political system was essential if the Soviet Union was to meet the challenge of technological and social modernisation. M.Patel 0022699 Russian Politics ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. U.S. - Soviet relations.

    American attitudes toward the Soviet Union, in turn, reflected profound concern about Soviet violation of human rights, democratic procedures, and international rules of civility. With brutal force, Soviet leaders had imposed from above a revolution of agricultural collectivization and industrialization.

  2. Free essay

    In relation to Gorbachev and his program of perestroika (economic reform) and why it ...

    economic and social costs related to this in order to understand the economic system which Gorbachev inherited. By the end of the Brezhnev era (1982) economic growth had fell to nearly zero. This resulted in shortages of basic foods such as dairy products.

  1. Why was "vice" and sexual scandal a public worry in 1950s London

    As the accounts that appeared in Saturday evening newspapers suggest, fairly detailed briefings of the press had taken place soon after the arrests. These provided material for sensational copy, and the story would stay on the front pages until the three men were convicted on 24 March 1954.13 Higgins' argument

  2. Historical Approaches to studying the themes of 'Society' and 'Economy'

    Alternatively, whilst it is important to look at the qualitative ways in which historians study these two perspectives, it is also vital for them to use quantitative measures. In doing so historians can gain a more insightful view as to the effects that these will have on history in general.

  1. To what extent does Gorbachev deserve credit for the collapse of Communism in Eastern ...

    However, many older and more conservative members of the Party deeply resented Gorbachev for his 'cosy relationship' with the Western capitalist world. At the same time many liberals approved of the changing relationship between East and West. Keen to keep everyone happy, Gorbachev found himself 'straddling' both camps in order

  2. Do Great Men change the course of history? Discuss with reference to either Lenin ...

    synthesis between socialist and national loyalties."2 The resulting policy was an attempt to create a Soviet nationalist identity around shared proletarian identification. The constituent nations of the Soviet Union were thus brought into a unitary state, and a process of proletarization was undertaken to foster the desired Soviet nationalism.

  1. A study into how much John F. Kennedy was responsible for the ...

    of Pigs influenced Kennedy massively; he had learnt that it was dangerous to permit the CIA to act with total independence, along with further losing the little confidence he had left in the JCS. The impact the failed invasion had on Kennedy was evident in his instructions to the Joint

  2. In what ways do the themes of consumption and the informal economy, living standards ...

    welfare state, which Polish citizens looked forward to.[65] During the post-war era, a communist regime was established in Poland.[66] By using the themes of living standards, consumption and the informal economy, and social welfare, it has been possible to shed light on the nature of this communist regime, and the extent of its impact on the lives of ordinary people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work