• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WW1 Research Paper - The Actual Impact of Chemical Warfare in World War I

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐The Actual Impact of Chemical Warfare in World War I ?Chlorine kills by irritating the lungs to such an extent that they flood with fluid, and the victim ?drowns?; gas victims show blueness of the lips and face and the blood becomes starved of oxygen.?[1] From this description of the devastating impact of chemical agents on unprotected soldiers at war, it is evident that this inhumane fighting tactic had the potential to play a crucial role in World War I. But chemical weapons had some drawbacks. First, they were difficult for the user to control due to weather conditions. Second, soldiers were able to protect themselves with proper attire which limited chemical warfare?s ultimate impact. As a result, many people have misunderstood the actual role and impact of chemical warfare during World War I. This paper will demonstrate that, in fact, the most significant impact of chemical weapons during World War I was their psychological effect ? that is, the sheer panic and terror that could overtake a soldier at the thought of becoming exposed to these vicious chemical agents. It will provide evidence that after some early success, chemical warfare did not break the stalemate on the battlefield, nor did it contribute to a significantly increased death toll in the soldiers? ranks. The paper will begin with an overview of chemical weapons used during World War I, which was the first conflict where chemical weapons were employed against soldiers. It will also address how the use of this inhumane tactic became so prevalent during this war. It will then describe several attempts by both the Axis and the Allies to use chemical weapons that did not significantly impact the outcomes of those conflicts. ...read more.


Early the following morning, the British soldiers released the chlorine gas over the German infantry in order to set themselves up for an infantry attack. But the plan was foiled when the wind changed directions and begun to blow the toxic gas back in the face of the attacking British infantrymen. As a result, the British inflicted more casualties to their own men then they did on the Germans.[14] Despite the failure of the first Allied attempt at employing chemical warfare, they continued to improve their tactics and were driven to be successful using this new way of fighting. In December 1915, the Germans brought a new type of poison gas into the war. This gas was called phosgene and it was even more potent than the previously used chlorine gas. This was a gas that had been used in the dye industry and the Germans believed that its toxicity would make it very effective in the war. The phosgene gas had a similar smell to that of newly mown hay and soldiers were able to identify when this type of gas attack was occurring pretty quickly. Although the soldiers were able to recognize these attacks, this gas caused lung damage very quickly to anyone who inhaled it before they were able to put on their gas masks. The French decided to try and retaliate with an attack using phosgene gas in February 1916.[15] And by 1916, both sides relied on heavy artillery to deliver specialized chemical shells. Once both sides had learned how to effectively use chemical weapons, protective measures were developed which diminished the effects of future attacks. ...read more.


Armed Forces. But only 2 percent of the chemical casualties among U.S. troops were fatal.[25] The other 98% were injured but survived. These numbers show that chemical weapons did not have a significant effect in terms of the number of deaths sustained, as only a small percentage of soldiers died from their effects. In fact, the overall death rate that resulted from chemical weapons during World War I was about 3%.[26] The most significant impacts of these weapons were their psychological effects and the amount of injuries they caused. Both the Allies and Axis used chemical warfare to attempt to end the continuous stalemate that had occurred from trench warfare and bring about decisive victories in World War I. But it is evident that it did not play a crucial role in determining the outcome of World War I, as many of the attempts using chemical warfare resulted in no substantial impact and it brought about no decisive victories for either side. However, this new war tactic did have a major impact on how the war was fought. Since this was a fighting tactic that had never been utilized in war before, it took some time and effort to understand what type of gas was being used in certain attacks and to develop effective equipment to protect soldiers from the gas. The use of chemical warfare also caused both the Allies and Axis to focus on developing different gases and brainstorming ways that would be the most effective in employing them against their enemy. Although this new fighting tactic changed the way the war was fought, chemical warfare?s main impact was the psychological toll it played on soldiers both on and off the battlefield throughout World War I. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1900-1919 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1900-1919 essays

  1. Analyse Woodrow Wilson's objectives in entering World War I and assess his success in ...

    The ratification of the treaty proved harder to obtain than formulating it. The Republicans refused to accept the treaty in its existing form. Though Wilson was extremely angered, on his return to Paris, he opted to make more modifications but he would not amend article 10, which was the main Republican target.

  2. Origins of the First World War

    special war council chaired by the Kaiser in 1912, where it was decided that it was necessary to establish a German hegemony before Russia could became more powerful. 14 By 1914, Germany was ready for war and took the opportunity to wage war, encouraging Austria-Hungary to start a war with

  1. Book Review: The Origins of the First World War: Controversies and Consensus (Annika Mombauer, ...

    The Fischer controversy can arguably be seen as the real starting point for the debate that still rages today, and so it is unsurprising that Mombauer's work takes a more argumentative tone and perhaps less distanced analysis. Mombauer is clearly a strong supporter of both the way in which Fischer attacked the subject and to a large extent his findings.

  2. The decade of the 1890s marked a distinct reorientation in the United States Government's ...

    of this and coming generations of Americans will be secure only as we cling to the watchword of true patriotism: "Our country-when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right."12 Schurz's and Twain's argument that it was not right for the US to rule a foreign country

  1. What do you understand by the notion of an invented tradition?

    Indeed, the attempt to establish Gaelic as the national language by making it compulsory in schools and decreeing that anyone employed in the civil service should speak Gaelic alienated many Irish citizens who had little or no understanding of what was supposed to be their mother tongue.(1)

  2. 1) In what ways are rebellions caused by the rise of new forms of collective ...

    Consequently, a huge number of French citizens came to question the legacy of absolutist rule and the role of the nobility. This went some way towards introducing the concept of setting up a republic in France to rid them of the monarchy's unfair taxation methods and military demands, amongst others.7

  1. Sir Arthur William Currie - this paper will attempt to prove that Sir Arthur ...

    Hence, it is important to know a few details before the central idea of the paper is illustrated. The first part of the research paper will provide the appropriate and basic information in order to make the readers clearly understand the context of research conducted and analyzed.

  2. History of deaf education and sign language in USA & UK

    There was another school for Jewish deaf children next door, actually on the site where the school is now, which had started in 1899. There was no contact between the two schools for the first 50 years - there was a high wall separating them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work