• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

EU Law - age discrimination and market access case studies.

Extracts from this document...


The first request for advice from Brenda involves a scenario in which one of her employees seeks action on the grounds of age discrimination. Having traditionally allowed two of her employees to leave early every day in order to pick their children up from school, a third employee wishes to leave early in order to visit an elderly mother. Should this be disallowed, the third employee, P, plans to invoke a defence based on the wording of the relevant secondary legislation. The EU Directive of 2006 states that discrimination on 'grounds of age' is prohibited, which P claims can encompass associated persons of the employee. However the measure that has been implemented into UK national law states that employers must not discriminate against employees 'because of their age'. Thus it would seem that the Directive would give her more rights than the UK Act, because of it's broader ambit. If action is taken, the first test is whether the relevant provision is directly effective, that is, whether it creates both an obligation for Member States, and rights for the individual (C-26/62 NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration), and can be invoked by said individual when taking legal action. The case of C-41/74 Van Duyn v Home Office stated that Directives are capable of Direct Effect as long as they satisfy the Van Gend en Loos criteria. ...read more.


As of the first principle, indistinctly applicable measures can be prohibited, so Article 34,can still prohibit these measures though they don't blatantly prejudice importers. The mutual recognition principal aims to prevent the banning of the sale of products which are lawfully produced in another Member State, even if they were manufactured according to technical and quality rules different from those that must be met by domestic products. This relates to the requirement of a 'finishing and polishing area', if the jewellery passes standards of UK law, they are of an acceptable standard to sell in any Member State. With regards to the requirement of registration, the principal is designed to prevent the need for undergoing procedures repeatedly (the dual-burden principal). So, unless the French government can justify the measures using either a Cassis mandatory requirement or an Article 36 justification, they amount to MEQRs. From the Cassis mandatory requirements, the French government would use the 'defence of the consumer' avenue, which covers both measures, while using the public policy derogation from Article 36 to justify the culturally prized finishing and polishing stage. These justifications must now undergo a 'proportionality test', as of the case C-261/81 Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA. Here it is stated that when the measure 'exceeds the requirements of the object in view, consumers may in fact be protected just as effectively by other measures'. ...read more.


On the face of it, the justification seems fair given the spate of deaths of toddlers, however, being a blanket ban it is very restrictive. From past case law, there seems to be a tendency of the ECJ to lean towards health warning labels, for example in Case C-178/84 Commission v Germany, where health labels were recommended, which are less restrictive but still achieve the aim required. Though, due to the severity of the situation in Poland, it is possible that this alternative may not be found to be effective in reducing the deaths by the ECJ, so it could deem the higher standards proportionate. If any of the above measures are disproportionate MEQRs, she can rely on Article 34 in court in an action against the authority because it is directly effective according to the test put forward in the case of van Gend en Loos. This required four things, the provision to be sufficiently clear, which of course is applicable here as it is a short concise article stating the prohibition of quantitative restrictions and MEQRS. Next the article has to be unconditional, which it is. It must be based on negative obligation, which here it is requiring Member States not to do something (ie. place quantitive restrictions or MEQRs on imports). Finally it must not require further legislation on the part of the Member State, which here it doesn't. B can thus use this legislation to launch action against the authorities, or continue business and use it as a defence, should the authorities launch action. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What is the meaning of the term 'measure equivalent to a quantitative restriction' for ...

    4 star(s)

    Further to this are measures which make imports more costly or difficult, which is actually another extension of the principles laid down in Rewe. The second category of MEQR's is that of indistinctly applicable rules. These are measures that do not have any directly discriminatory effect, in that they do

  2. What are the outer limits of Article 28 EU?

    However some concern has been expressed by problems of uncertainty in the regulatory structure, where it concerns cross-border trade, as a trader has to face along process to adopt technical requirements. Currall declared Cassis to give "such potential chaos that the fundamental necessity for speeding up the harmonization would be appreciated"49.

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    outer boundaries of those markets may lead to unjustified inferences of power and predation. [FN24] Although it is sometimes stated that this deep-pocket firm must also have an established reputation as a predator in the market, this reputation might not be considered as an absolute requirement for inferring predation.

  2. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    are used for a variety of purposes - many of which are little to do with technical protection methods 3 . In the process of investigating an algorithm, cryptographers may discover weaknesses by showing that the encrypted message can be obtained, in effect, that the measure can be circumvented, thus making the academic concerned liable to prosecution.

  1. Discussion of the quotation from Advocate General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. ...

    Finally, notwithstanding the extra costs and delays that would ensue for an applicant, the decision to refer under Art 234, and perhaps more importantly, if the measure takes the form, as in the present case, of a regulation, no implementing measures are necessary and therefore not acts of the member

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    Effectively this charge had similar effect to a customs duty, which article 25 prohibits. Member states often argue charges imposed on imported goods escape article 25 prohibition because they are for services rendered to the importer such as a quality control inspection service.

  1. Critically discuss the proposition that the Treaty of Lisbon has completed the evolution of ...

    the way for the accession to the ECHR have finally fully evolved the EU legal system. I however, must conclude that due to recent political and economic changes and challenges that the evolution of the EU legal order is not finished yet.

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    claims for loss suffered as a result of legislation adopted in contravention of directly effective Treaty provisions. Moreover, it should be of interest to Sunita that in Dillenkofer v Germany this principle was applied to incorporate improperly implemented Directives. These authorities also clarify that for state liability to be found

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work