• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

In this essay it is my intention to evaluate by means of a critical analysis the mens rae of murder.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE MENS REA OF MURDER INTRODUCTION In this essay it is my intention to evaluate by means of a critical analysis the mens rae of murder. In order to try and do this one has to explain what murder and mens rae are and how they work in a criminal context. THE LAW Back in the 1800?s Lord Chief Justice Cockburn, described mens rae and intention, - If a man did an act, more especially if that were an illegal act, although its immediate purpose might not be to take life, yet if it were such that life was necessarily endangered by it, - if a man did such an act, not with the purpose of taking life, but with the knowledge or belief that life was likely to be sacrificed by it, that was not only murder by the law of England, but by the law of probably every other country.[1] Lord Cook?s classic definition states: "Murder is when a man of sound memory and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any county of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the king's peace, with malice aforethought, either expressed by the party or implied by law. ...read more.


In Woollin[10] the appeal was allowed and a conviction of manslaughter was substituted in this case. When we take a look at Smith[11], there was no evidence that Smith intended to kill the police officer, but through his actions it was clear that he had intended at the very least, to cause grievous bodily harm which means no more and no less than really serious injury[12], thus fulfilling the criteria for the charge of murder against Smith. For the offence of murder to be complete, intention does not require premeditation or ill will, as all that has to be proved is either an intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm[13]. Although a motive may well be relevant in cases of murder, it does not prove intention[14]. Nedrick[15] and Woollen[16] are the most relevant precedents on the subject of mens rae in murder. In Nedrick[17], D set a house alight, resulting in the death of a child. As the question of his intention was paramount to the case, the question was asked, was death or serious bodily harm a virtual certainty (barring some unforeseen intervention) ...read more.


In a particularly topical case of Hull[27] Coffey says: Hull illustrates the importance of taking into account the particular intent required by the statutory definition of the offence charged in the indictment. While the accused may have intended to pull the trigger intentionally he may not have had the intention to kill or cause serious bodily harm when he pulled the trigger. This pertains to the fundamental issue as to whether he pulled the trigger accidentally (inadvertence) or intentionally (advertence). Intention relates to a particular consequence, that is, to the specific offence charged, and cannot be established by proving recklessness[28]. The Law Commission report on murder, manslaughter and infanticide[29] goes on to say, at Para 1.8: The law governing homicide in England and Wales is a rickety structure set upon shaky foundations. Some of its rules have remained unaltered since the seventeenth century, even though it has long been acknowledged that they are in dire need of reform[30]. If a defendant is to be convicted of the most serious of crimes, ?the taking of a life? surely he /she is entitled to the knowledge of what his actions may been seen as before he commits the crime and one can only hope that a change and simplification of this little understood term comes sooner rather than later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past ...

    5 star(s)

    consequence does not establish intent to produce that result but is only evidence from which a jury may infer intent. The conviction was upheld by a 3:2 decision accepting that foresight of consequences being highly probable was sufficient to establish intent.

  2. criminal Essay

    These cases were not decided on any clear principle of law, simply the public interest in the eyes of the court. In Wilson45, it was held that the husband's desire to give his wife something she wanted was analogous to tattooing and, therefore, lawful.

  1. R v Nedrick and R v Woollin: intention in murder.

    Section 1 of the Homicide Act 1957 did nothing to expressly settle the meaning of 'malice aforethought'; it remains a question of common law. The most recent authorities on determining whether the defendant had the necessary intent, and how the jury should be directed on this issue, are the cases on R v Nedrick 1and R v Woollin2.

  2. This essay will look at the possible liability of Alice and Briony for the ...

    Hence, different juries, deciding upon the same facts may come to different conclusions of guilty or not guilty, leading some to say that the law is unjust because all individuals are not treated equally. Smith and Hogan argue that the requirement that the consequence of ones actions should be virtually certain to the defendants (a subjective test,)

  1. Discussing Homicide - constructive manslaughter.

    when the vessel of which the appellant was owner and master foundered off the north Cornish coast with the deaths of three of her crew. At a critical moment, her engines stopped and within minutes she was blown onto rocks and broke up completely.

  2. Criminal Law - Defining Intention

    is to perform specific act and motive is purpose for having the intention to perform the specific act.? The prosecution needs not to prove the defendant?s motive. Nevertheless, they may make an issue of motive is related with case. For example, if a defendant denies the conviction and produces evidence showing that he had no motive to commit the crime.

  1. This essay will discuss the similarities between the Irish and UK legislation on assisted ...

    These guidelines highlight the situations where the DPP is more likely to prosecute an individual[12]. The DPP in the UK was forced to produce these guidelines after the Purdy case[13]. In 2008 Debbie Purdy, who suffers from MS, won her case in the House of Lords against the British government.

  2. The decision in DPP v Smith [2006] EWHC Crim (Admin) has resulted in the ...

    Lord Salmon's obiter (Abbott v The Queen (1977)) stating that the Law Lords are opposed to any usurpation by the courts of the functions of Parliament, but "strongly uphold the right and indeed the duty of the judges to adapt and develop the principles of the common law in an

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work