Do the versions of Utopia offered by 20th Century writers suggest its unattainability or merely wrong ways of going about it?

Authors Avatar

Twentieth Century Literature

     

           Literature and Politics

   Module:  ELS 3501

  1. Do the versions of Utopia offered by 20th Century

Writers suggest its unattainability or merely wrong ways of going about it?

     

        …Les utopies sont realisables.  La vie marche

            Vers les utopies.  Et peut-etre un siecle nouveau

            Commence-t-il, un siecle ou les intellectuels et

            La classe cultivee reveront aux moyens d’eviter

            Les utopies et de retourner a une societe non    

            Utopique, moins ‘parfaite’ et plus libre.

                                                        Nicolas Berdiaeff

This epigraph by Nicolas Berdiaeff provides a thought-provoking introduction to Aldous Huxley's 1932 novel, Brave New World.  Here Berdiaeff realises that utopias are achievable and yet they must be avoided, "...Et nous nous trouvons actuellement devant une question bien autrement angoisante:  Comment eviter leur realisation definitive?"

(Berdiaeff, N).  In this essay I have chosen Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and Animal Farm by George Orwell to illustrate the intentions of these two twentieth century

writers when tackling the subject of Utopia/Dystopia.  I will outline obvious parallels in the two works and attempt to conclude that, while Huxley seems to oppose the idea of a successful utopic society, Orwell, in his 1945 political fable 'Animal Farm' strives to inform the reader of key moments where it may have been achieved.  This would rely on particular characters realising significant events and acting on them.  Both the mentioned texts can be historically placed after World War One and World War Two respectively and are committed social critiques, in that they deal with two completely different societies adapting to a dramatic change in world order.   Brave New World comments on the implications of the advancement of science and its effects on humankind, Animal Farm specifically maps out the events that took place after the 1917 Russian revolution.

London, AF632.  This is a world where 'Utopia' has seemingly been achieved through generations of genetic modification and human conditioning.  The reader is instantly introduced to the Central London Hachery and Conditioning Centre.  Huxley creates the image of a cold, clinical environment where the first stage of human production takes

place, the Fertilizing Room.  Here a tour is being conducted by the Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning, he guides a batch of students around describing to them the modern, conveyor belt style, fertilising process, "...the operation undergone voluntarily for the good of society" (A. Huxley p. 3).  The fundamental aspects of natural, human life are now pre-destined and controlled by the state.  Standardisation and uniformity appear to be

Join now!

the solution in creating an established and stable social system, the state motto being Community, Identity, Stability.  Within the fertilizing process there is another process

that is performed on the Gamma, Delta and Epsilon ova.  The Bokanovsky Process is a 'prodigious improvement' (Brave New World p.4), "Making ninety-six human beings

grow where only one grew before" (A. Huxley p. 4).  The Director states that this process, "...is one of the major instruments of social stability" (A. Huxley p. 5).  

As I have mentioned in the introduction, this text comments on society, post war.  One ...

This is a preview of the whole essay