Chaos Theory: A Modern Revelation.

Authors Avatar

                                                                                

Chaos Theory: A Modern Revelation

        How is it that a subject so entwined in nearly every aspect of every-day life, can be so overlooked?  Such is the case of the recently discovered chaos theory.  Upon hearing the term, one would deem it as just another proposition that scientists seem to manufacture endlessly.  However, in An Introduction to Chaos Theory and Fractal Geometry, Manus J. Donahue III states that the name chaos theory is in itself actually a contradiction.  He explains that it “…leads the reader to believe that mathematicians have discovered some new and definitive knowledge…” (n.p.).  On the contrary, the first descriptions of chaos theory were discovered nearly thirty years ago.  Now while this still may be fairly recent, at least in the realm of science discoveries, chaos theory is definitely not, by any means, any definitive knowledge.  Even to this day, scientists are discovering new areas that chaos can be applied to.  Chaos is not a definitive term in itself, either.  Being a complex science that has applications in nearly realm of understanding, chaos theory cannot be defined in any one specific way. Jonathan Mendelson and Elana Blumenthal state the general definition of chaos, in Chaos Theory and Fractals, as the “…turmoil, turbulence, primordial abyss, and undesired randomness…” (n.p.).  However, this is not the definition of chaos that scientists use. For instance, in his book, Science of Chaos, Christopher Lampton defines chaos as a system where minute variations in ordered initial conditions can have a significant enough impact on the results to make them seem random (13).  Aside from the many varying definitions of Chaos theory, it can also be applied to a large number of aspects of every-day life.  Some of these aspects include weather prediction, fractal geometry, and nonlinear dynamics.

                                                                                

        The pre-existing notions of chaos began to re-emerge in the late 1960’s by Edward Lorenz, an aspiring meteorologist studying at MIT.  The Butterfly Effect, a concept found by mistake, became a basic principal that was used to describe chaos theory (Donahue n.p.).  The name was coined by Lorenz based on the belief that if a butterfly were to flap its wings in Asia, weather patterns would be effected by it in New York (Lampton 68).  It was believed that the small air currents made by the butterfly’s flapping wings could, eventually, lead to huge storm systems, weather variation, and drastic unpredicted effects with the help of convection currents and other chaotic occurrences.  Lorenz happened upon the principle while using a computer to analyze a sequence of data in order to predict what the weather might be.  As described by Greg Rae in his article Chaos Theory: A Brief Introduction, “…one day, instead of starting the sequence of data over, Lorenz decided to take a shortcut and start in the middle of the sequence and proceeded to type in the data from an earlier printout” (n.p.).  James Gleick furthers the description and states that Lorenz then left to take a short break, and when he returned, what he discovered from  the diverging results meant not only that long-range weather forecasting was out of business, but also that a new science was emerging (17).  Lorenz found that the new values that he had input seemed to coincide with the original values to an extent and then diverged wildly.  He concluded that the effect that his data experienced was sensitivity to initial conditions.  Eventually Lorenz used his Butterfly Effect to come to the conjecture that “Small variations in initial conditions result in huge, dynamic transformations in concluding events” (Donahue n.p.).  This meant that even the minutest differences in any input in a chaotic system will result in traumatic effects, and

Join now!

                                                                                

that it would be nearly impossible to forecast the weather over a long period of time.  After compiling and analyzing his unbelievable findings, Lorenz then developed three equations from the field of fluid dynamics to represent his results graphically.

x' = 3(y - x)
y' = -xz + 26.5x - y 
z' = xy - z

When he graphed these on a three-dimensional plane, the equations demonstrated the characteristics of a chaotic system exactly.  The graph was both ordered and chaotic at the same time.  The equations resulted in a graph that looped back and forth, but never crossed or settled down ...

This is a preview of the whole essay