• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the role of interest and pressure groups in the UK, France and Russia.

Extracts from this document...


Compare the role of interest and pressure groups in the UK, France and Russia. An interest or pressure group is an organisation association that aims to influence the policies or actions of government1. Where politic parties aim to become government, pressure groups seek to exert influence from outside. Typically they have a narrow issue focus and are supported by a select group of voters who wish to further their own interests regarding a specific matter. For example, environmental concerns about pollution. This essay will illustrate the distinct role of interest groups in three different countries. It is interesting to notice the differing political backgrounds of the three countries and the interpretations of democracy in each case. The government and historical background of these three countries dictates the current attitude to pressure group activity. There are three different perspectives. The New Right argues that interest groups are unrepresentative and unaccountable and ultimately undermine government by promoting individual welfare. The pluralist perspective argues that pressure groups promote compromise and are healthy for democracy as they are a means for articulating conflicting interests in society. The UK is a good example of this perspective in practice as the government have close relationships with unions and outside interest groups. Britain has a "powerful network of specialised interest organisations"2 which often influence public policy. The Petrol Crisis of Autumn 2000 was a classic example of how a small but highly organised pressure group can have a significant political impact in a short period of time. ...read more.


The large organisations which are in place for unions are often internally divided creating more problems for the French system. Similarly, Russia is hindered by poorly organised and incoherent interest groups. Pressure groups with strong links to the Soviet-party state often perpetuate influence. Other groups are notoriously weak and find difficulty gaining support due to the restrictions placed on the media. Corporatism is a "relationship between the state and interest groups in which major decisions on domestic matters emerge from discussion between the government and a few peak associations."5 In return for their influence these favoured groups are expected to ensure the compliance of their members. Russian pressure groups are well known for internal influence and corruption of the government. The separation between public and private sectors, so central to the organisation of interests in the West, has not emerged in this democracy and this has led to an unnatural balance of power. Many private entrepreneurs compete for wealth which can be extracted from previously state-owned industries. Although Trade Unions have broad membership, they are co-opted by management and government and avoid direct links with non-governmental political parties. This means they are limited in their influence and can be quickly overruled by more influential players such as the financial industrial groups. The government allows tacit abuse of union power if it means they will gain support. In France there have been a limited number of examples of corporatism between unions and government. ...read more.


However, the current style of "personal rather than institutional"8 pressure politics does not look all together hopeful for the future in Russia. Similarly, the tradition of protest politics within France is unlikely to subside. Regardless of how the pressure groups within each country gain power, they all influence government. Their role in each country is of key importance to policy decisions. Therefore they are a very influential force for governments to deal with. Resources R. Elgie S. Griggs (2000) French Politics - Debates and Controversies (London 2000) J. Forbes N. Hewlett (1994) Contemporary France (Essex 1994) R. Hague M. Harrop (2001) Comparative Government and Politics (Hampshire 2001) A. Heywood (2002) Politics 2nd Ed .(Hampshire 1997) W. Grant (2000) Pressure Groups and British Politics (London 2000) M. Olson (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982) J. Richardson (1993) Pressure Groups (New York 1993) S. White et al, (2001) Developments in Russian Politics 5 (London 2001) 1 A. Heywood (2002) Politics 2nd Ed .(Hampshire 1997), p272 2 M. Olson (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982), p78. 3A. Heywood (2002) Politics 2nd Ed .(Hampshire 1997), p422 4 R. Elgie S. Griggs (2000) French Politics - Debates and Controversies (London 2000) p 147 5 R. Hague M. Harrop (2001) Comparative Government and Politics (Hampshire 2001) p 161 6 J. Forbes N. Hewlett (1994) Contemporary France (Essex 1994) p35 7 A. Heywood (2002) Politics 2nd Ed .(Hampshire 1997), p278 8 R. Hague M. Harrop (2001) Comparative Government and Politics (Hampshire 2001) p 165 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. How has the success of the Extreme Right in France come about and what ...

    This is due to the democratic systems that the modern extreme right work within, thus any form of anti-democratic policy would probably result in a complete collapse in support and membership of an extreme right party. In contrast, to be an anti-democratic party can be viewed as a party that

  2. Despite the high hopes of a decade ago, post-communist Russia has clearly not emerged ...

    us with five different proven 'modes of transition' to liberal democracy.5 Of these five, the 'transformation from above' method fits best with the process of reform that has been prevalent in post-communist Russia. Democracy was not the call of the people in Russia, who had wished in 1990, for more political and economic freedom, at best.

  1. Critically examine the role of political ideas in the Russian Revolution

    19th century and early 20th century Russian had roughly 80% of its population living in poverty as communally organized peasants4. The large peasant population feeling neglected in a society which was largely based around agriculture was one of the key elements that enabled the 1917 revolution to take place.

  2. How would you characterise the structure of party system of the French Fifth Republic? ...

    the period of 1958-1965 due to the uniting of the fragmented right electorate under the Gaullist 'umbrella.' Also, the centrally located parties declined in influence and popularity, though this was a more gradual process, culminating, "In 1974 with the final incorporation into the majority of the last centrist party" (Bartolini 1984, p.

  1. International Negotiation

    and by Contracting States which are not members of the Bank in accordance with rules adopted by the Administrative Council.4 The Administrative Council is composed of one representative of each Contracting State. In the absence of a contrary designation, each governor and alternate governor of the Bank appointed by a

  2. Critically compare and contrast the democratisation of Egypt and Saudi Arabia

    As regards freedom from religious intervention in state affairs, however, I would argue that this represents a secularist view of the state that may not be appropriate for the Islamic societies of the Middle East.6 Therefore I will be discounting this particular criterion These two types of criteria can also,

  1. Has the role of interest groups in the United States corrupted the political process

    Thus, America acts as a neutral, pluralist society which promotes freedom of expression and encourages organization of individuals to pursue causes in a form of political consensus. Perhaps it is because of this stress on liberty and equality that there is such scepticism of interest groups - many believe that

  2. Critically assess the main themes underlying the ideological discourse of the Front Nationale party ...

    On the one hand, we can see a moral opposition to this statement and on the other we can notice that the party believes that French citizens are ?engaged in demographic warfare with non-French immigrants?, who are more fertile than French citizens.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work