'Critically assess the relationship between the growth of consumer culture and urban development in one city of your choice.'

Authors Avatar

Registration Number: 453684

‘Critically assess the relationship between the growth of consumer culture and urban development in one city of your choice.’

        Consumer culture is related to the process of consumerism, which is defined as ‘a term used to describe the effects of equating personal happiness with purchasing material possessions and consumption’ (Wikipedia, 2005). Consumption is defined as ‘The purchase and utilization of goods and services’ (Knox and Pinch, 1982) and the three main geographical themes surrounding the geography of consumption are: spatialities, socialities and subjectives (Miles and Miles). Within this broad depth of classifying consumption it is possible to identify that consumption is not just related to the manufactured goods that are sold , but also to services, knowledge and ideas and it is now commonly accepted that places, shopping, eating, fashion, leisure and recreation are all things that can be ‘consumed’ (Jayne, 2005). The key issue in the relationship beween consumption and urban change is that the production and consumption realtionship that once existed has now been reversed, and subsequently provides the centre of a modern urban lifestyle. Urban development is defines as ‘the physical, social and economic development of metropolitan regions, municipalities and neighbourhoods’ (Wikipedia, 2005). The physical change of a city is mainly concerned with the spatial geography of consumption, however it is important to consider the effect that socialities and subjectives have on development, especially socially and economically. Through using the city of Manchester I shall assess the relationship between consumption and urban development through the following development periods of a city: Industrial, Fordist, Post-Fordist, Post-Industrial, Modernism and Post-Modernism.

        The industrial city emerged during the industrial revolution which was said to be ‘The era in which machine power replaced human and animal power in the production process, generally said to have first begun on a large scale in England during the 1600s’  (Wikipedia, 2005). It was a result of manufacturing and production focused capitalism and the government  were in control of  the cities development. Manchester became the world’s first industrial city and the model for industrial development throughout the western world. The local authorities of Manchester were responsible for the maintenance of collective consumption infrastructure to meet the needs of the growing population as a result of the industrialisation of Manchester. According to Pacione Manchester’s population grew by 351% from 75, 000 (1801) to 338, 000 (1851) and the reasons for this he identifies as a need for a large pool of labour. Jayne identifies that for a city to be economically and functionally successful that housing, gas, electricity, water, sewage, education and transport had to be organised around the economic needs of the industry and the domestic needs of workers.  Pacione suggests that ‘the burgeoning populations of the nineteenth-century industrial cities placed an enormous strain on the urban services and infrastructure’ (2001). The role of the local authorities in development was therefore largely influenced by industrialists, the reasons for this were that they had to plan and develop the city around the public provisions, as well as providing access to services and utilities. Such services and utilities were therefore consumed by the growing population of the industrial city and were vital to ensure the smooth running of industrialised capitalism. (Jayne). In Manchester the increased manufacturing production, and the wealth which that generated, though firmly in the hands of a few leading industrialists, did impact upon the city's standard of living. Schools, hospitals, libraries, swimming baths, and public washhouses - all these could now be afforded as a municipal duty, and paid for out of rates. It was a combination of industrialisation and population growth that provided the basis for the formation of a relationship between urban development and consumption; as the city developed physically to support the population growth, the city also developed socially and economically through the consumption of services. Collective consumption was described by Suanders (1981) as a definate characteristic of a city under advanced capitalism.

Join now!

        The fordist city: this was the next stage in the development of cities and was based around the idea of Fordism. Knox and Pinch define fordism as ‘a system of industrial organisation established by Henry Ford at the beginning of the twentieth century for the mass production of automobiles.’ He was also responsible for the development of the assembly line method early in the 20th century. The result of this was that workers did relatively simple tasks and were  aided by specialised machines. This approach enhances production so much so that manufacturers are able to cut the cost of products ...

This is a preview of the whole essay