The Treaty Of Paris also provided much needed hope for the other four countries who had signed.
The Benelux countries had been destroyed by Hitler's armies, so their main concern was to tie up Germany into a structure, whereby, it could not solely dominate their political independence or their economies again.
Italy, however, was interested in a much needed market for its goods, therefore could not economically afford to be excluded from the markets of France and Germany.
The United Kingdom had been invited but, declined the offer and sent observers.
The ECSC was both perceived as a political and economic success, that its participants made the decision to develop this aspiring community further.
Messina Conference, 1955.
This conference was held in Messina, Italy, under the chairmanship of the Belgium Foreign Minister: Paul-Henri Spack.
The purpose of this conference was to extend the economic co-operation way beyond the industries of coal and steel; between the six counties who had signed the Treaty Of Paris.
The UK had yet again declined an invite, but yet again sent observers.
This conference resulted in two further treaties:
- The European Atomic Energy Authority (EURATOM)
- The European Economic Community (EEC)
These Treaties where the Treaties Of Rome.
Where again, the UK did not join, and remained stand-offish.
The Treaties Of Rome & its Signatories - EEC & EURATOM.
EURATOM.
The purpose of this Treaty was to encourage the fast development of the nuclear industries. This was because, during the 1950s, these industries were thought to be at the heart of any future development of energy and supply.
EEC.
This Treaty was the principle Treaty of the two. Its purpose was to further develop a ‘common market’. The Treaty established a Customs Union, which was done to initialise trade. It was sought that the six member countries would be able to trade freely with each other, without any tariffs, such as the Benelux countries had enforced.
The six countries set up a CET: a Common External Tariff against non-member countries in order to enable them to be able to work as a trading bloc with the rest of the world.
The EEC & its Aims.
As already stated, the EEC was a signatory from the Treaty Of Rome.
Therefore, this Customs Union, with the establishment of the CET, was also designed to promote the Free Movement of Goods, People, Services and Capital within the proposed ‘common market’. Within a few years, Member States had transferred to EEC powers. On the 1st January, 1958, the EEC formally came into existence.
This was the principle Treaty which stemmed for the Treaties Of Rome. With the main aim established of creating a ‘common market’, ultimately the six countries who signed this Treaty in 1957 were provided for by the ‘Four Freedoms’; of goods, services, people & capital. The significance of the ‘Four Freedoms’ is that they are thought of as the foundations of the European Community. These ‘Four Freedoms’ include all forms of economic activity.
However, the Treaty Of Rome did not only provide each Member State with these provisions, but also;
Agriculture; Transport; Trade with non Member States.
- Special rules for competition.
- The setting up of the Institutions & Procedures for EEC.
The point to this was to create “an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe”. The foremost aim was that of the harmonisation and integration of economies and also perhaps that in the future, there could be possibilities for political integration.
The future was improving for all citizens of the six Member States, both in prosperity and wellbeing. This can be clearly seen today as then there were 170 million citizens; now there are 370 million. Once there were six Member States; now there are fifteen.
After the Treaties Of Rome were passed, the EEC was left with three Communities who all possessed structures which could act independently from the participating Member States. Each of these Communities had an Assembly, a Council and a Court Of Justice. The Treaties Of Rome had established a Commission, whereas the ECSC had a High Authority. In 1967, a merger Treaty was completed, this Treaty established the coming together of each community’s structures. A single Council, A single Assembly and the Commission. These bodies are still in effect today, with the exception of; the Council which is now the Council Of Ministers and the Assembly which is now Parliament.
Since the beginning of the EEC, Europe has continually developed. From a Community concerned mainly with economics, Europe grew to the EC- the “European Community”, in 1986, concerned with wider interests, such as education & health. Then in 1993, Europe evolved to the EU- the “European Union”, this change was to highlight the political & social unions of all Member States.
Britain’s Involvement.
The British government had declined every offer from the beginning to join the ever developing union of countries. The UK had remained aloof throughout all talks and negotiations. Although the UK had suffered damage from W.W.II, it had not been invaded and was still had some world power. Britain felt that it had enough economic ties as America was one of their main trading blocs, they also had both the British Empire and the Commonwealth. The government at the time, Conservative basically did not want to give up any of their sovereignty.
A change of heart occurred in 1961, when the British Government began to realise that the EEC a more and more prosperous and powerful trading bloc. They made the an attempt to join, however, in 1963 their application was denied by the French President; Charles de Gaul.
In 1967, Britain reapplied to join the EEC. Yet again, de Gaul rejected their application.
In 1969, Charles de Gaul retired. This opened up negotiation for Britain to join the EEC. So, in 1973, the British Government signed the Treaty Of Accession, which formally made them a member of the EEC. At this time two other countries also joined; Denmark and Ireland.
Even after their membership, Britain still continued to have strong objectives.
The Conservative Government, in 1991, objected very strongly to the aims of the Maastricht Treaty. They did not agree with the idea of a single currency as they felt it would be a direct threat to British sovereignty & a move towards a federal Europe, (see later, page --) Neither did they agree with the Social Charter; a list of workers rights, as they felt it would create an inflexible workforce, giving trade unions too much say. The Conservative Government managed to secure an ‘opt out’ clause of both of these.
However, a change in government, to New Labour in 1997, saw an end to the ‘opt out’ clause and accepted the Social Charter.
* See Appendix 1 for key dates of Britain’s Role in Europe.
Current Membership.
Over the page
is a map showing the
present 15 Member States of the
European Union, and on the next page is a chart
which shows the dates each of these countries joined.
The 15 Member States:-
These were the 6 Founder Members;
Germany
France Signed March 1957,
Italy 1yr before the EEC began
Belgium 1st January, 1958
Netherlands
Luxembourg
UK
Ireland These 3 countries then joined; January, 1973.
Denmark
Greece This country joined in 1981.
Spain Joined 1986.
Portugal
Austria
Finland Joined 1995.
Sweden
By 2004, Hungary, Slovenia, Poland, Czech Republic, Cyprus & Estonia hope to join.
After them, a second wave may join: Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania & Slovakia & perhaps Turkey.
Political, Social & Economic Progress. - The Incremental Stages.
The Institutions.
The belief and the will of the people of Europe to “create an ever closer union”, has contributed to the determination to create a more social, economic and prosperous Europe.
Every organisation needs some form of structure, for example;
- a policy generating process
- a decision generating process
- an administrative generating process
- a dispute resolving process.
As it is already known, the EU is made up of independent states. These states need a system where their views are taken into account fairly.
There are three main institutions:
- The Commission - who propose
- The Parliament - who advises
- The Council Of Ministers - who decide
These institutions do not work solely, they work in close co-operation for the benefit of all European citizens.
The Commission.
Composition - 20 Members
Term of office - 5 years (1995 - 2000)
Headquarters - Rue de la Loi, B - 1049, Brussels.
The European Union’s policy making process responsibilities, lies with the Commission, (often referred to as the ‘heart of Europe’ as other institutions derive strength from this body). Before any form of legislation can be passed, the Council Of Ministers and the European Parliament, need to have a proposal from the Commission. The Commission meets once a week.
Commissioners tend to have previously served as Ministers or MPs to their National Governments, e.g. Neil Kinnock was the leader of the Labour party, before he became a Commissioner. The twenty members of the Commission, have their loyalties to the European Union and not to their National Governments.
Each Commissioner is appointed after agreement between the governments of Member States after having the approval of the European Parliament. The Parliament also has to approve of all the members of the Commission before they can take up office. At present, the Commission is in office with Romano Prodi, an Italian, as President, the term of office runs from 2000 until 2005.
However, a Parliamentary vote of censure, may be required of the Commission. This is where they are made to resign en bloc, as a whole. Although, this power has never yet been used.
The Commission is the largest European Union Institution. It acts as the “Guardian of the Treaties”, in the sense that legislation and directives that are adopted by the Council are implemented by the Commission.
The three main powers of the Commission are:-
- The Commission initiates proposals for legislation in the European Union.
- The Commission is known as the “Guardian of the Treaties”.
- Being the manager & executor of Union policies and of international trade relationships.
As stated above, there are 20 Commissioners from 15 Member States. Large states have 2 Commissioners, smaller states have only 1 Commissioner:-
France 2
Germany 2
Italy 2
Spain 2
UK 2
Belgium 1
Netherlands 1
Luxembourg 1
Ireland 1
Sweden 1
Denmark 1
Austria 1
Finland 1
Portugal 1
Greece 1
The Parliament.
Composition - 626 Members (can be a maximum of 700)
Term of Office - elected every 5 years
Meeting places - Strasbourg for monthly plenary sessions
Brussels for committee meetings.
Address - General Secretariat of the European Parliament,
L-2929, Luxembourg.
Without Parliament’s consent, European Law cannot be enacted. It’s Primary objectives are to pass laws and control the executive power. Parliament was first set up by the Treaty Of Rome, and was originally called the Assembly. Since both the Single European Act, 1987, and both the Maastricht Treaty, 1993, and the Treaty Of Amsterdam, 1997, these powers have been strengthened.
Parliament often works in parallel with the Council Of Ministers to a legislative capacity, i.e. having the ability by means of power of co-decision in certain policy areas.
The most important powers of the European Parliament fall into three categories:
- Legislative Power.
Parliament must always be;
- consulted
- co-operation, co-decision
- Parliament’s consent required when countries wish to join.
2. Power over the Budget.
- the Commission propose a budget, Parliament must approve
- Commission cannot allocate funds until Parliament are consulted
- Parliament has power to reject or ask for amendments.
3. Power over the Executive.
- Commission/ Council Of Ministers come before the European Parliament to answer questions.
- can pass a vote of no confidence
- can force the Commission to resign.
Current Membership figures:-
France 87
Germany 99
Italy 87
Spain 64
UK 87
Belgium 25
Netherlands 31
Luxembourg 6
Iceland 15
Sweden 22
Denmark 16
Austria 21
Finland 16
Portugal 25
Greece 25
The Council Of Ministers.
Composition - Ministers of 15 Member States.
Term of office - rotates every 6 months.
Meeting Place - Brussels, (sometimes Luxembourg).
Address - Rue de la Loi 175, B-1048, Brussels.
The Council Of Ministers, often referred to as the Council Of The European Union, meet regularly. They are the “ultimate decision makers”. The Council Of Ministers enacts European laws and has joint control over legislation and the Union’s budget, alongside the European Parliament. The Council Of Ministers is the main legislative organ of the Union.
Each subject on the agenda has an appointed Minister who has responsibility for that particular area. For example; if the matter in question concerned Transport, then the Transport Minister would attend, and so on and so forth, i.e. The corresponding Minister to the issue will attend. Some Ministers end up meeting monthly, for others it is only two or three times a year.
Some matters are decided upon by a unanimous vote, others by quality majority voting.
The Presidency of the Council Of Ministers Rotates every six months, January - June then July - December, between Member States.
This role has become more and more important as the Union has its responsibilities.
It must:-
• Arrange & preside over all meetings
• Elaborate acceptable compromises & find realistic solutions to problems submitted to the Council.
• Seek to secure consistency & continuity in decision taking.
The Three Councils.
The European Union seems to be awash with different organisations, particularly Councils. Sometimes confusion can occur, the following table gives some information on Europe’s three Councils:-
The Institution Of My Choice - The Council Of Ministers.
On the previous pages, there are insights into the three main institutions. However, I am going to take one of these and review them in slightly more depth. The area that I am going to explore is that of the Council Of Ministers in more depth.
As mentioned briefly before, the Council Of Minister, (COM), is composed of one representative from each Member State. Therefore, the Ministers who attend varies according to the subject that is open for discussion.
The COM act in the interests of their own Member State, not that of the European Unions.
The Council Of Ministers are the institution responsible for making major policy decisions within the European Union. They are also responsible for adopting proposes from the European Commission, they then make these proposals into Community Laws.
The joint co-decision that the COM and Parliament have apply to issues such as the E.U’s Budget, Consumer Protection, Education, Health, etc.
The Presidency.
We already know that the Council rotates between Member States every six months.
This is in accordance with a rota:-
As you can see form the table, the last time the UK was in Presidency, was in 1998. At present, Belgium are in Presidency.
The role of the Presidency plays a vital part in the organisation of the work of the institution. The Presidency has to organise and chair all meetings and try to reach compromises to resolve any difficulties which may arise. The Presidency is assisted by the General Secretariat, who acts as a High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy and the E.U for matters concerned to that policy. The COM is also assisted by COREPER, * See later, page _ _.
The General Secretariat.
The main responsibility of the General Secretariat ,(GS), is to ensure the smooth running of the COM and to prepare their work for meetings, etc. The GS advises the COM’s Presidency on their work of co-ordination. A big part of the GS’s responsibility is to ensure that the necessary translation of the meetings documents and reports, which it drafts, are completed. The GS acts as a legal advisor to the Council Of Ministers. Also provides an administrative service to the COM and COREPER. Nationals of the fifteen Member States work at the General Secretariat, this number is approximately at 2500.
The General Secretariat is based in Brussels. It is appointed by the two people responsible for the running of the General Secretariat, They are; Janvier Solana - Secretary General and Pierre de Boissieu - Deputy Secretary General.
Below is a small chart which shows the composition of the General Secretariat:-
General Secretariat
Legal Service Press Office Directorates
Private Offices - General
Secretary General Deputy Secretary General
COREPER.
This is the Committee of Permanent Representatives, or as they say in French -
‘COmite de REpresentants PERmanents’, this is where CO-RE-PER comes from.
In terms of the UK Government, this group could be compared too the Secretaries of State, who are assisted by Senior Civil Servants.
The composition of the COREPER are ambassadors to the Community of the 15 Member States, who are also assisted by advisors and committees of national civil servants.
COREPER is divided into two sections;
COREPER 1 - Deputy Permanent Representatives
- Deals with such matters such as Social Policy, Environment, etc.
COREPER 2 - Permanent Representatives (Ambassadors).
- Is the more important of the two as it tends to deal with more important issues such as economic problems, and financial matters that are affecting the E.U.
The members of COREPER's loyalties, lies with their own Member States not with the Union’s.
If delegated by Ministers, COREPER does have the authority to take decisions , on less important issues, without debate if a representative of the Commission and COREPER are both in agreement.
Decision Making.
- Taken either by Qualified Majority Voting (QMV )
Or
Unanimity.
The decisions are come to by a series of structures, named Pillars. There are three Pillars.
Pillar 1
- Covers a wide range of policies; agriculture, transport, environment, energy, research & development.
Begins with the Commission issuing a proposal which the COM can either adopt, amend or reject.
The Maastricht Treaty increased the European Parliament's say through a co-decision procedure, This means that a wide range of legislation, (internal market, education, health,......) Is adopted by both the Parliament and the Council Of Ministers.
The majority of cases, (agriculture, fisheries, internal market & transport), the COM decides by QMV, with Member States carrying the following weightings:
Germany 10
France 10
Italy 10
UK 10
Spain 8
Belgium 5
Greece 5
Netherlands 5
Portugal 5
Austria 4
Sweden 4
Ireland 3
Denmark 3
Finland 3
Luxembourg 2
Total = 87 votes.
When a Commission proposal is involved, at least 62 votes must be cast in favour for it to be passed.
Pillar 2
- Common Foreign & Security Policy.
Objectives are to define and implement an external policy covering all foreign and security aspects.
Decided by a unanimous vote.
Pillar 3
- Co-operation in the fields of justice and home affairs.
Free Movement of Persons inside the Union: promote measures of common interest in external border control, asylum policy, immigration policy, & fight against terrorism, drug trafficking and other issues of crime.
The Future Of Europe.
There are a number of proposed future developments of the European Union. These include:
• Increased membership
• Moving towards a more Federal Europe
• The Single European Currency
Increased Membership.
When the EEC began in 1958, it had 6 Members, this had doubled by 1988 to 12 Members. By 1995 this number had increased again to 15, and still there are continuous interest from countries wishing to join this ever expanding and prosperous Union. The E.U has grown to be the largest trading bloc in the world.
There are two points of view with regards to increased membership.
These are that:-
1. It should be on a large-scale development
2. It should be done in slow, incremental stages.
The first view would mean an influx in trade and possible greater wealth to Member States. Whereas the second view would allow gradual time to develop the stability of Europe so that once other countries have joined, their needs and requirements and Europe’s needs and requirements can both be met.
However, the structure of the Union seems to outvote one of the views as the European Union was originally set up with the aim of dealing with 6 countries, not over 20. The way that the E.U runs would need to dramatically change if there was a very large increase in membership.
Federal Europe.
This would literally mean that we would live in a combined Europe, a ‘European Super State’, where the National Governments of Member States would not have the sovereignty that they have at present. The European Union would act as the National Government as it would be making all the important decisions that affect the Member States. Present National Governments would become subordinate Regional Governments which could only make decisions that affect and concern only their area.
Moving towards a Federal Europe would mean that we would be part of a State like the USA, where power is divided between:-
• Central Governments,
(President, Senate, House of Representatives & Supreme Court)
-who have responsibility for issues such as defence & taxation that affect all citizens.
and
• State Governments,
-who have the authority to make decisions that affect a particular area.
E.g. in the USA different States have different laws on the use of the death penalty, abortions & alcohol.
An advantage of this would be that Europe could become more of an ‘ever closer union’, as it would be united. A disadvantage however, would be that a lot of our decisions would be made for us, and be made with allowance that al Member States could comply which would mean that a decision that may be good for one Member State, may not have the same affect for another.
In the UK at the moment, we live in a Unitary State. This means that although power lies with the Central Government, legal bodies such as the Scottish Parliament and local authorities exist and their ability to have power, over issues such as; housing, law & order, education... comes from it having been granted from the Central Government. The Central Government, for example in the UK is Westminster, who deals with issues like defence, immigration, employment, etc.
Therefore, the direction of power flows as so:-
Central Government
Scottish Parliament
Scottish Local Authorities
The Single Currency.
The meaning of this proposed development is that instead of having a different currency for each Member State, one currency would be used throughout Europe. The suggested currency is to be named the ‘Euro’.
There are many advantages to this, including;
• All currency in Member States will have the same value.
• Interest rates will be lower = lower mortgages
• More jobs shall be created by increased business due to lower inflation & stable prices/ lower interest rates.
Disadvantages include;
• Some loss of jobs
• Fears to loss of sovereignty in monetary matters
• Reliability of this currency, if it fails.
Joining the single currency, for Britain, would mean-
- our costs would be reduced
- we would have a major say in European Decision making
- foreign companies may be more likely to invest in the UK
- price of goods will come down, such as cars which are cheaper on the continent
- we will not be at a disadvantage to other Member States as we will have the same privileges.
For example:
Costs would be reduced, especially for businesses. The currency conversation costs companies a lot of money, particularly small businesses. The UK’s Interest Rates are notably higher than French or German rates, due to our poor track record of inflation.
At present, the Bank Of England decides on our Interest Rates, if we join the single currency, the European Central Bank will have that power. British Interest Rates, at 4.50% at the moment are higher than in the Euro Zone, which are at 4.75%.
Ultimately, if the UK does not join, the people of Britain will not have any say.
Conclusion.
Looking at the European Union as a whole, it functions well as the relations between each institution is based on co-operation. The three main institutions serve their purpose fully as they carry out their decision making and policy making processes on a purely democratic level which provides Member States with continuous development both to their economic, social and cultural welfare.
I feel that joining the Single currency of the Euro would benefit the UK greatly, from a consumer’s point of view and a Business’s. We would be on the receiving end of a range of advantages, such as more money to spend- as we will have lower mortgages as a result of lower interest rates. Unemployment also has the opportunity to decrease as more jobs will be created as a result of the increase in sales.
I still remain unsure of whether each Member State would be at a complete advantage if we moved into a more Federal Europe. I have my doubts if larger states would have the same benefits from such a State as smaller Members would. I think however, that the increased enlargement can only be a good thing, especially for each Member State’s economy. More States would mean an even bigger trading bloc, therefore this will increase competition and hopefully in the long run reduce costs to a minimum.
The European Union has only ever progressed in developments during its legacy. Any future developments I hope will continue this well into the future. Economically the E.U is in focus, however politically, perhaps some adjustments need to be addressed, with regards to the views of Member States.
Appendix 1 - Britain’s Role in Europe.
1945- Britain & her allies win the war
1940- 50s- Britain’s main concern was with her Empire & Colonies and her “special relationship” with USA
1956- EEC formed but Britain does not join
1961 Britain applies to join the EEC
1963 Britain’ application is rejected by the French President; Charles
de Gaul.
1967- Britain reapplies to join but again their application is rejected by de Gaul.
1969- Charles de Gaul retires & Britain is able to negotiate entry to the EEC.
1972- Britain agrees to join
1973- Britain becomes a member of the EEC along with Denmark & Ireland.
1975- Referendum takes place in Britain over EEC membership, 67.2% vote in favour.
1979- First direct elections to European Parliament.
1980- Britain’s contribution to EEC reduced.
1987- Single European Act came into force in 1992
1991- Britain opts out of social chapter in Maastricht Treaty.
1997- Amsterdam Treaty came into force 1999
2000- Nice Treaty “The Future Of Europe” will enter into force once it is fully ratified by all 15 Member States.
Bibliography.
• European Community Law Andrew Charlesworth & Holly Cullen
• European Community Law James Hanlon.
• Europa web site http://europa.eu.int/index_en.htm
• The BBC News web site www.bbc.co.uk
• All college notes & handouts