Some mental disorders are culture bound. Discuss in relation to at least one example.

Authors Avatar

33038334

‘Some mental disorders are culture-bound syndromes.’ Discuss using AT LEAST ONE example.

This essay will first examine the factors which influence the prevalence of certain mental health disorders and use analysis of this to critique the idea of a culture-bound syndrome. Then it will use discourse to show why the concept of a mental health disorder is a contentious one and how the treatment of abnormal socio-cultural phenomena as mental health disorders will not allow for them to be treated. The culture-bound mental illness that will be used for this analysis will be anorexia nervosa.

Cartesian mind-body dualism still dominates thinking about illness due to the fact there are distinct and separate categories in healthcare as a whole for dealing with diseases of the mind and diseases of the body. While physical illnesses are considered diseases of the body it is the so called diseases of the mind that are ascribed the category of mental illness (despite the fact that many have a strong impact upon the body). Busfield describes mental disorders as “a culturally and socially relative category whose precise boundaries and meanings vary over time” (2001). These changeable boundaries and definitions of mental disorders are best demonstrated in Thomas Szasz’s discussion on the status of homosexuality

“For many years psychiatrists imprisoned homosexuals and tries to “cure” them; now they self-righteously proclaim that homosexuality is normal and diagnose people who oppose that view as “homophobic”” Szasz (2007:96)

Thus demonstrating that the definitions of what is a mental disorder are not fixed and are very much related to what is considered socially acceptable in a particular society and at the time of their existence. The nature of this is rooted in what Foucault calls the ‘order of reason’ which is what is considered reasonable given a particular time and is shown in the methods for explaining things. Mental illness is often considered in opposition to this reason. An example of differing orders of reason would be if today a psychiatrist suggested treating mental health issues with exorcism it would not be accepted where as 400 years ago it would have. Busfield echo’s Foucault when she views mental disorders as the regulation of this ‘reason’ (by defining what is unreasonable) and that all mental disorders are linked to the ideas of unreason, not just those of madness. Now in defining what is reason, it must be understood what is normal behavior in a society. What can be considered a mental illness in one society may be considered ‘normal’ behavior in another. To take an example; if someone was talking with sprits and dead people in western society they would be considered madness where as in many other societies, in the world it would be a desirable trait and may lead to the person becoming a Shaman, a respected figure in society.

Join now!

 

So it can be said that if mental illnesses are shaped by the type of society they exist in and what is normal to that society then there will be certain mental illnesses that only affect certain societies as only they have the cultural and social ingredients to make that illness. These are what is called a culture-bound illness or mental illness and has been defined as

“The term “culture bound syndrome” is used to denote any of certain recurrent, locality-specific patters of aberrant behavior and experience” Simmons & Hughes (1993:75)

The next part of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay