• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There was no general drift to war in 1914 rather there was the determination of one power (Germany) to exploit the Balkan crisis to change the international status quo in its favour". Critically evaluate this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"There was no general drift to war in 1914 rather there was the determination of one power (Germany) to exploit the Balkan crisis to change the international status quo in its favour". Critically evaluate this statement. I agree completely with the above statement. This statement is accurate for a huge number of reasons. For example Germanys policy in the Balkans, and Germanys tactical alliance with Austria-Hungary. Once Germany felt the uneasiness in the feelings of Europe it used this uneasiness to its advantage. For a long time Germany waited in the wings so to speak for the chance to gain ground over Britain. When the Balkan crisis happened Germany viewed this as their chance to "change the international status quo in its favour". In Europe during the late eighteen hundreds, late nineteen hundreds there existed an alliance system. On one side you had a triple alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy and on the other you had a triple entente of France, Russia and Britain. ...read more.

Middle

This is just one example of where Germany exploited the Balkan crisis in its own favour. The Young Turks policy of Ottomanization caused the Balkan states to come together and form what was known as the Balkan league. This league was formed in nineteen twelve and composed of Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece and Montenegro. The policy of Ottomanization meant the voluntary assumption by all the subjects of the empire, Moslems and Christians alike, of the full duties of citizenship coupled with a loyal support of the government. The Balkan war of nineteen twelve had the members of the Balkan league on one side and Turkey on another. It caused great and universal surprise because the world was not prepared for the quick and resounding victory won by the allies. Turkey fared badly at the Treaty of London because its size was reduced dramatically. All Ottoman territory was surrendered to the victorious allies. Bulgaria however was unhappy with the outcome of the Treaty of London and so as a result on June twenty ninth nineteen thirteen war was declared among the allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Germany had always felt left out in colonial expansion. Germany felt that Britain and France were denying them their rightful share of colonial influence. They thought the Balkan crisis was their chance to increase their colonial influence without the help of Britain or France. Therefore Germany exploited the Balkan crisis in an effort to change the international status quo in its favour. Germany totally exploited the Balkan crisis to their advantage. They were determined to change the international status quo in its favour. They knew that by backing Austria during the crisis, they in turn would support Germany should a war start. Germany knew that backing Austria during the crisis would eventually lead to a European conflict and when Austria handed its ultimatum to Serbia, this conflict started. In a way Germany got what it wanted even though they weren't seen as being the ones who started the war. Germany knew that by backing Austria, it would mean that the already fragile lines of communication between Austria and Serbia would be irreconcilably damaged. This ensured that the international status quo was changed in Germanys favour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Manning's Quasi-Masterpiece: The Nature of International Society Revisited

    So, while the nation as composed of flesh and blood is in reality a reality, the state, as distinct from its machinery, from its citizenry, and from its territory, is a reality only in idea.' Manning, Nature, p 22.

  2. What caused the Financial Crisis: An in-depth study of Neoliberalism and the Lehman Brothers

    It is argued that these Acts were attempting to continue the works of the neoliberal ideas of Ronald Reagan, however Cassidy displays that the Acts were in fact both extremely counterproductive and not neoliberalist in intention (Cassidy 2009 p286). These Acts are counterproductive in the way that they have been

  1. What is more important in international mediation power or impartiality?

    42), can be seen as a focal point of tension within the study of mediation that theorists then begin to debate as to what lengths this should be done. For example, Moore writes in contrast, that mediation itself should be impartial with no authoritative decision making (Zartman, 2007: 166).

  2. EU Enlargement and Turkey

    Once the Council unanimously agrees a negotiating mandate, negotiations may be formally opened between the candidate and all the Member States. This is not automatic, though. The applicant country must meet a core of criteria before negotiations start. The so-called "Copenhagen criteria", set out in December 1993 by the European

  1. How did new military technologies change warfare? Consider the period from 1815 to 1914.

    the Dawn of Classical Warfare to the End of the Second World War (1946), J F C Fuller, also draws upon an intuitive periodisation; firstly, the age of valour, whereby the spear, sword, bow and arrow were its symbols, secondly; the age of chivalry, where the soldier was transformed into

  2. Conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBH) which both remain predominantly ethnically homogeneous. Are there any power and/or wealth differentials between the groups? Before the war, BiH was truly multinational as it had no titular nation to dominate its decision-making process. (Friedman 2004: 22) Equally, the B.

  1. The Factors That Resulted in the Outbreak of the First World War in 1914

    The war was just on the verge of breaking out. Austria-Hungary and Serbia The First World War actually began over a local war, launched by the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary against Serbia. Then the local war immediately led to the confrontation between the two blocs.

  2. The power of citizenship is probably best known by those who are denied it. ...

    The problem lies here in that UNWRA is not an alternative to legal protection for the Palestinians, it cannot guarantee their rights. In Lebanese law, rights are afforded to non-citizens on the basis that these rights are afforded to Lebanese citizens in the recipient?s country (Ministerial Decree No.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work