Why Has Nationality Failed To Prevail Over Ethnicity In Pakistan after more than 50 years and counting...

Authors Avatar

WHY HAS NATIONALITY FAILED TO PREVAIL OVER ETHNICITY IN PAKISTAN AFTER MORE THAN 50 YEARS AND COUNTING….

Ethnicity is based on language, culture and religion, among other things. Pakistan, like other post-colonial states is multi-ethnic, and herein lays the failure of our leaders, who were unable to realize this basic fact.

The Muslim League even during its heydays was never an organization .Rather the sole reason for its phenomenal success was mass popular support. The Pakistan movement though led by secular, liberal educated middle classes primarily drew its mass support on the basis of an Islamic communitarian tradition. After partition, save for a brief period which ended with the tragic assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan, Pakistan has failed to produce a leader capable of joining the various ethnic groups residing within its boundaries. A  commonly held distinction between an ethnic and a nationalist movement is that while an ethnic politician tries to gain some advantage within an existing state, a nationalist seeks to establish or maintain his own state. In the case of Pakistan, more often than not, the ethnic politicians have held sway.

Join now!

Interaction between the various ethnic communities on power-sharing has been the causal factor in catalyzing the ethno-national movements. No group has been completely satisfied whenever a leader from such other ethnicity takes control of the government. The only person who came the closest to some sort of a truce was Bhutto, his greatest political accomplishment being the agreement between the regional and national elites during his tenure .However, his arrogant and insulting style of politics ultimately led him to his downfall and political abandonment.

 Secondly, religion plays a central role in bringing a nation together. Once Pakistan was created, Islam ...

This is a preview of the whole essay