• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957? The EEC's description is as an economic customs union, in a supranational political structure. In 1951 the 'Six' first established their European unity by signing the Treaty of Paris, which was the beginning of the European Coal and Steel Community. The ECSC followed a Plan by French Foreign Minister Robert Schumen, which arranged the ECSC as the institution for the European coal and steel industries. The EEC was the result of talks started at Messina, then finalised when the Treaty of Rome was signed by the 'Six' in 1957. Britain was not present at the talks at Messina, or for the signing of the Treaty of Paris or the Treaty of Rome. This meant that Britain had not got involved in the EEC when it was established, meaning it would be harder to get involved later. A phrase applied to this lack of involvement from the start, is "missed the bus" into Europe. A conservative MP, Anthony Nutting, wrote in his book Europe Will Not Wait (1964) that he believed that by "missing the bus" Britain had been left far behind, loosing the chance to take a role of leadership in Europe, from there it could have moulded Europe to suit itself. Also he explained that if Britain had realised it would have had to join in the future anyway, there could have been more involvement in the talks in Messina, and the Rome Treaty, which would have meant an early membership to the EEC and not a late one in 1957. There are reasons why Britain 'missed the bus', and there are also reasons that prove that Britain did not 'miss the bus' but didn't want to or need to get the 'bus'. These reasons affect the absence of involvement in the Schuman Plan talks, or the Messina talks. The reasons behind Britain's absence at the Schuman Plan talks have been summarised by Edmund Dell, a Labour MP. ...read more.

Middle

This supports the view that Britain did 'miss the bus' because the country was stuck on the belief of it having a lot of power, more than it did actually have. James Ellison described how Britain had tried to influence the European integration, encouraging a more intergovernmental community instead of the full integration the supranational community would have. In 1955 the 'Six' were encouraged to follow the OEEC system instead of the EEC, but the 'Six' stayed with the EEC. The British Treasury and Board of Trade began to see the threat of being stuck outside the customs union. In 1956 the Plan G was developed proposing a free trade area (beneficial to Britain because it could include trade with the Commonwealth), which was based on an intergovernmental system. But thought the negotiations over Plan G continued from 1957 until 1958 with the 'Six' the free trade area did not fully work, if it had Britain would have not been so isolated from Europe. This supports the view that Britain had 'miss the bus' but it also describes how Britain had tried to get into Europe a different way, which failed. The failure could have been because the EEC 'bus' was not heading in the same direction, as Britain wanted to go. The Free Trade area talks failed as the European countries such as West Germany didn't want to increase its markets in exports. Plan G also failed, Europe wanted a full supranational integration, not the more limited integration Plan G suggested. The reasons why Britain's applications between 1957 up to 1973 can all be based on the factor of General de Gaulle being President of France and his dislike for British involvement in the Europe. General De Gaulle became President in 1958; he used few political 'niceties' and immediately vetoed the Free Trade area talks. He found that without Britain's presence in the EEC France could take the leadership role without competition. ...read more.

Conclusion

De Gaulle rejected all of Britain's applications to join the EEC for the reasons of not being European enough, needing too many negotiations which could change the community, and because Britain was too close to America. He personally wanted to Britain to be excluded so it could not rival France's power in Europe. Once De Gaulle had retired and the new French President Pompidou too over, Britain was given membership to the EEC, having talked to British Prime Minister Heath Pompidou was convinced of his honesty and pro-European attitude. In 1957 Britain was held back from becoming a member of the EEC because of economic reasons and political reasons. Having 'miss the bus' into Europe Britain was not able to join the EEC until much later in 1973, the reasons for this time between were political and economic, but more importantly the factor of the French leader De Gaulle. Economically through the years between when Britain 'miss the bus' and the final application in 1973 Britain economy had been weakening, the strength of the sterling had been lowering and Britain had to negotiate to become a member of the EEC, over agriculture and coal and steel industries. Politically Britain was accused of not being pro-European enough, by having to divide its attention between the Commonwealth countries and its Special Relationship with America Britain could give little attention to the EEC or Europe. The last factor of De Gaulle meant that Britain did not gain membership until De Gaulle had retired. De Gaulle vetoed Britain's applications, accusing of not being pro-European enough, this may have been because he wished France to remain the leader of Europe with no competition from Britain. Also he had plans of Europe becoming a 'Third Force' independent from American influences, Britain would have joined the EEC meaning America could influence Britain who would in turn influence the other European countries. Britain finally obtained membership to the EEC in 1973, with the French President's support. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "'A troublesome partner.' Using examples, to what extent would you say this comment accurately ...

    4 star(s)

    to create a stronger Eurosceptic axis.4 She departed from the previous 2 terms in which there was broad agreement over EC issues. The final straw for Thatcher was at the Rome summit in October 1990. Here, she openly opposed the abolition of Sterling to the Delors Committee, and resigned after strong criticism from Heseltine and Major.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Should Britain Join the Euro

    v Protection of the Environment: The Environment knows no border and so the only effective way to tackle environmental pollution is through international co-operation and action. Britain has cleaner water, cleaner air and cleaner beaches because of action at the EU level v Greater Co-operation in Law Enforcement: EU co-operation

  1. Examples: Shadows of Leadership

    However, it was apparent by TXU manager Gordon Hall that their policy has changed. This time TXU is strictly following the union contracts rules on severance pay to union workers. Mr. Hall said, "The severance benefits for union employees are spelled out in their contract, while benefits for non-union workers are dictated by company policy."

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    are greater as companies can sell their products anywhere in the member states and consumers can buy where they want without any penalty. Boots Europe 2001/2002 faced challenges as of the euro, but Boots in the Netherlands opened 15 new stores and profits have increased by 8%.

  1. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    Some political writers make a clear division and state that in "...spite of spreading integration, membership of the EU has little impact on the way government actually works in Britain."21 This concisely provides a counter argument. The reason justify this point is that the "...Union has no direct administration of

  2. Why is Britain hesitating about membership of EMU and what are the main issues?

    However, these issues are not alone in this outmoded vision of British uniqueness and superiority in Europe. The British Pound has always been a symbol of national pride, representing power and prosperity throughout the civilised world. Pound Sterling was (until the First World War at least)

  1. Free essay

    Finnish Party System

    Organizational democracy is increasing as well. In nominating candidates for election, the National Coalition has started using the same method as the SDP, by arranging a general vote by the members for nominating candidates. IV. Parties in the Political System The two hundred member unicameral parliament of Finland is known as the Eduskunta.

  2. The aim of this essay is to present the reason of British government changing ...

    It was at this point that pro-European movements and supporters of federalism moved into action and vigorously promoted the idea of European unification. Closely associated with financial circles and demonstrating allegiance to a particular political tendency, or seeking, on the contrary, to mobilize the mass of public opinion, these movements,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work