• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Should We Value Democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY SHOULD WE VALUE DEMOCRACY? The democratic political tradition can be traced back to ancient Greece, although the cause of democracy was not taken up by political thinkers until the 19th century. Before the 19th century democracy was generally dismissed as rule by the ignorant and unenlightened masses, however today in the modern world we all seem to be democratic; every political ideology out there seems to have democratic values and credentials.i This essay will first take a definition of democracy into consideration and then look at the values of democracy from a number of political theorists, including Plato, Dworkin and Rousseau. Then a conclusion will be a drawn into why we should value democracy. Democracy is usually taken from the Greek as "demos" "kratos", demos meaning people and kratos meaning rule thereby literally rule by the people. There are many different types of democracy; Classical democracy, Developmental democracy, protective democracy and deliberative democracy. Classical democracy is simply a system based on the citizens having direct and continuous participation within the government. Developmental democracy concerns broadening population participation and in doing so will advance flourishing individual thinkers and freedom. ...read more.

Middle

Either way, democracy will only represent the majority of opinions taken, and here we see a problem with the general will and the will of all. Rousseau claims that the general will may not be the will of all especially as civilization spreads. Large polities need a stronger government however and when the general will is taken it generally lets the executive gain at its expense. The general will is what makes for the common good. Rousseau's view is that if citizens were separated and each registered their wills individually then the overlap between all wills would form the general will. The general will must be "general in its object as well as its essence"ivit must apply to all citizens. He is clear however that this is different to the will of all as in the real world citizens are very frequently persuaded to act against their common interest.v If a country decides to set up a King then it cannot be directly informed on a named individual, First it is necessary for the general will to set up a democratic government and then only this government can decide who will be king. ...read more.

Conclusion

It does allow some sort of political participation although it is arguable how much and it certainly doesn't allow active action. We can evidently refer back to Rousseau's quote of "there has never been a true democracy and there never will be"xi as it shows a remarkable sense of truth, as Winston Churchill also famously quoted "Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried" Which also shows an incredible sense of truth, it is in principle a way of achieving the 'right result' that is at least as good as or better than the rule by experts. i Andrew Heywood, Political theory an introduction, democracy representation and the public interest, third edition 2004 ii Plato, Republic, 282 iii Jonathan wolf, introduction to political philosophy, who should rule, pg 67 iv -jeacques Rousseau, the social contract, bk II chapt4 p. 205 v Alan Cromatie, Rousseau notes, lecture vi Jean-jeacques Rousseau, the social contract, bk III,chpt 15, pg 266 vii Jean-jeacques Rousseau, the social contract, bk III, chapt 5 viii John S. Mill, representative government, 299 ix Christiano, T., 2004, "The Authority of Democracy," Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, n. 3 (August): pp. 266-290. x Ronald dworkin, sovereign virtue, political equality, chapt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. What is truth according to Platos allegory of the cave?

    and never make it up road to the outer world into true light. This metaphor can be seen as one person realising that they have been fed lies throughout their life but because their imagination is limited to only seeing the real things in front of them they are confused

  2. Compare and contrast the oratorical skills of Martin Luther King and Winston Churchill in ...

    As a result, it is critical to first comprehend the underlying importance of Aristotle's theory of rhetoric in relation to both of these speeches as it helps to underpin the methods of persuasion that these leaders demonstrate in their speeches.

  1. A Study of Nationalism and its relevance in Muslim States.

    He insisted therefore that it was of the utmost importance for Communists to support these nationalist movements, especially in struggles against their "own" imperialism. At the same time Lenin realized that this strategy carried with it the danger of blurring the Marxist distinction "between the interests of the oppressed classes,

  2. Do the people truly rule in a representative democracy?

    From these definitions representative democracy cannot be seen as a system in which the people truly rule as the people themselves do not directly make decisions, nor are their opinions and needs consistently made present in the political sphere. These are issues that are exaggerated in the modern day with

  1. In what ways do 'Jeffersonian' and 'Hamiltonian' concepts of American government and democracy differ ...

    Although Jefferson acknowledged the necessity of central government in its role maintaining social security, he emphasized that the role of the individual was far more important, and subsequently Jeffersonian democracy maintains that the government is only as strong as those it governs.

  2. A critical analysis of Wollstonecraft's reaction to Rousseau

    purpose of women, suggesting instead that there is no inherent difference at all. Rousseau continues by attempting to explain better what he means by women being ?weak? and ?passive?; trying to define them as positive adjectives in the hope of avoiding criticism, particularly from women.

  1. Power. A gets B to do something that he or she would not ...

    Influence exists where A, 'without resorting to either a tacit or an overt threat of severe deprivation causes B to change his course of action (p.30). In a situation involving authority 'B complies because he recognises that A's command is reasonable in terms of his own values' - either because

  2. Rousseau's views on authority and freedom and their implications for modern democracy.

    Rousseau substitutes instinct (natural freedom) for justice and gives action a moral quality that they previously lack[7]. Driven by appetite alone is slavery, while obedience to the law that one prescribes to oneself is freedom[8]. In a way, he legitimizes his polity, reconciling the idea of authority and freedom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work