How significant are Iagos soliloquies to the development of tragedy in Othello?

Authors Avatar

How significant are Iago’s soliloquies to the development of tragedy in ‘Othello’?

Tragedy is constantly evolving, with differing key aspects defining how tragedians have constructed their plays. Stoppard believed tragedy should be defined as: “Wheels [that] have been set in motion and they have their own pace, to which we are . . . condemned. Each move is dictated by the previous one - that is the meaning of order”. Shakespeare uses Iago to orchestrate Othello’s tragic downfall and has him ‘set the wheels in motion’ by using a dramatic device usually associated with a tragic hero, rather than the antagonist, in soliloquies.

Shakespeare has Iago use his soliloquies to foreshadow everything we see throughout the play, showing his careful consideration to how he will engineer Othello’s downfall. During Iago’s soliloquies, Shakespeare ensures his plots are made blatant as he hopes ‘to get his place and to plume up my will in double knavery’ and will do so by having ‘our Michael Cassio on the hip’. The vivid imagery of Cassio being powerless at Iago’s mercy is used by Shakespeare early on in the play to heighten the audience’s fear when Iago eventually ‘wounds Cassio in the leg’. Shakespeare has Iago share key details to his plot as he plans to ‘question Cassio of Bianca’ after ‘I will in Cassio’s lodging lose this napkin’. Shakespeare does this to trigger a feeling of helplessness in the audience as they watch Cassio fall into Iago’s trap, resulting in his actions becoming detrimental to Othello. The hatred for Iago progresses as those around him continue to call him ‘honest Iago’, leaving the audience powerless in voicing the truth about his notions. Iago’s straightforward manipulation is foreshadowed as he tells the audience he will tamper with ‘Othello’s ear that he is too familiar with his wife’, setting the pace of Othello’s downfall. Shakespeare has these small acts of malice result in Othello’s formidable act of murder as ‘he smothers’ Desdemona, showing the power in Iago’s soliloquies to develop tragedy. Shakespeare has the audience become aware of Iago’s plot to frustrate them; the audience’s denial of a voice as they watch his plan unfold heightens their hatred for Iago as they recognise his power in controlling Othello’s demise. The sense of inevitability throughout the play emphasises the audience’s pathos for those Iago has planned to destroy, and the audience thus fear a lack of hope for Othello. Therefore Shakespeare makes Iago’s soliloquies significant by ensuring the audience feel helpless in preventing the tragedy they have foreseen, feeling hatred for Iago as his plans become inevitable.

Join now!

Iago’s constant use of satanic imagery in his soliloquies is used by Shakespeare to make it seem he is villainous enough to summon the devil. During his soliloquies, Shakespeare has him threaten that ‘devils will the blackest sins put on’ those around him as he screams ‘divinity of hell’. Elizabethan audiences dreaded the summoning of the devil; this satanic imagery is thus used to make the audience fearful that Iago is capable of such a ghastly act, presenting him as the pinnacle of evil. It is argued that Iago is the puppet master as he controls Othello, Desdemona and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

This essay starts well with a thoughtful consideration of some of the effects of the soliloquies. It contains some interesting ideas and makes several, mainly successful, attempts to include relevant contextual information. It is too repetitive in places, partly because it loses the focus on the soliloquies and partly because it needs a tighter structure to ensure relevance. In an essay that asks for consideration of particular parts of a text, it is best to consider structural significance (why do the soliloquies occur when they do?) and offer some close analysis of the passages in questions. This enables cross referencing with the wider play to be considered as well.

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

The structure here is superb. The introduction is cogent, offering a clear definition of tragedy, and the conclusion weaves the argument together by giving a judgement on the significance. Each paragraph has a clear signpost, which in turn means the paragraphs remain focus and don't repeat points. The use of technical terms throughout is excellent, showing a strong craft and style. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are flawless. This essay is to be admired!

The analysis in this essay is strong. At no point does this essay retell the plot, meaning that every point contributes to the argument through analysis. Such techniques ensure you are not wasting words by narrating, but instead replacing it with meaningful discussion which supports the argument. Language is analysed throughout, and the paragraph on satanic imagery is particularly strong. Contextual evidence is used to support the argument, drawing upon Renaissance literature to show the significance of Iago. Being able to weave these interpretations and contextual features in, as this essay has, makes the essay much more convincing. A common problem at any level is a bolt-on context sentence, or paragraph, whereas this essay is able to use context to support an argument. A style I particularly liked in this essay were the phrases such as "Shakespeare uses" as it shows that the play, and the characters within it, are constructs for dramatic effect. This ensures that beyond the analysis of Iago's soliloquies, there is is a discussion of why Shakespeare uses them to create Othello's tragedy. Being able to do this at A-Level will ensure you pick up the highest marks, as it shows how the techniques shape meanings.

This essay engages with the question superbly. There is a sustained focus on tragedy throughout, and the debate is carefully crafted. When talking about tragedy, it is clear that you focus on one definition as it allows for a cogent argument. This essay does this incredibly well, using Stoppard's definition to ensure the points within the play fit. I liked how there was a strong awareness of audience response, as this shows a understanding of the significance of the play as its medium. Iago's soliloquies are analysed and picked apart by this essay, allowing for the significance to be evaluated.