• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

Extracts from this document...


History Essay "Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited" "I am not yet ready to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling" - Tsar Nicholas II On the 1st of November 1894, Tsar Alexander III of Russia died of nephritis. Upon his death, his son Nicholas assumed the throne, becoming the Tsar of the Russian people being known as Nicholas II. He ascended at the age of 26 and had little political or imperial experience in how to run a nation; he had spent much of his father's reign performing administrative role while his father had run policy, Alexander III felt Nicholas was unsuited to power and declined to train him. This meant that Nicholas II had little practical knowledge of the country he now ruled. Russia was divided politically with ideological opposition to the government growing due to political repression, struggling economically due to failure to modernise Russia's economy and increasing debt levels due to Russia's reliance on borrowing money from other countries. Also, the social structure was on the verge of collapse due to a surging peasant population and discontent with the way that the nobility controlled much of the land despite not contributing significantly to production & agriculture. ...read more.


was a ballooning working class and increases in poverty and hunger in addition to the peasants wanting their own land and becoming politically aware. This coupled with an outdated autocratic system meant that Russia and Nicholas II were ill prepared to deal with the demands of its people meaning that the political system was dangerously on the verge of collapsing due to the changes in the social structure of Russia during the 19th century. The social structure in Russia at the time of Nicholas II's ascension in 1894 had undergone several changes in the past few decades. The nobility who were the ruling class made up just over 1% of the population but owned 25% of the land, creating a massive equality gap and meaning that the key to agricultural and industrial development was in the hands of a small amount of people. Some of the nobility held positions in the government and military but were there because of influence, not merit meaning that many key officials were corrupt or incompetent, resulting in a problem of how to deliver efficient government. Also, an increasing number were moving to cities so communication between them and the peasants on their land was difficult. ...read more.


While perhaps it is no fault of the Tsars that Russia is such a large country, it can be said that their economic policies hampered modernisation of the transport and industrial system. They had no idea about how to control this so in effect, Nicholas II inherited a large country that was struggling to travel across its own land. To conclude, Nicholas II suffered mostly because of the mistakes of the previous Tsars. He ascended as an autocrat, but the autocracy in Russia was becoming outdated and the position was unable to cope with a modernising country, especially with it now being occupied by a weak man. The political system had lost much credibility due to the failure of reforms and the unequal social structure meant that increasing numbers of peasants were disenchanted with the way that they were being treated, leading to social tensions. The economy was restricted and outdated and unable to cope with industrial demand, meaning that it could not effectively modernise. So, Nicholas II inherited an effectively outdated Russia struggling to modernise. "There is a radical difference between Russia and a colony: Russia is an independent and strong power. She has the right and the strength not to want to be the eternal handmaiden of states which are more developed economically." - Sergei Witte ?? ?? ?? ?? Max Rodgers 12C History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * After the harvest of 1929 there was a great campaign to collectivise. Peasants were supposed to vote on collectivisation, but in most cases it was forced through by party officials. What were the effects of Collectivisation? * Between November 1929 and March 1930 60% of all farms were collectivised.

  2. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    Both the previous Tsars had failed to modernise Russia, and so now Nicholas II was left to finish the impossible task. Nicholas II knew that modernisation was essential; however, he dreaded the expansion of the urban proletariat since they were easy targets to revolutionary opposition eager to spread their ideas.

  1. How far was the death of Alexander II a turning point in the development ...

    the peasants was increased by the appointment of the land captains and a law making violation of contracts between landlords and a tenants criminal act. In addition to reversing the Laws which were introduced by his father, in order to strengthen the idea of Russification, the electorate was reduced, for

  2. How well equipped was Tsar Nicholas II to deal with the problems that faced ...

    Also despite their demands not being extreme or too radical when compared to the other opposition groups they opposed the system of Tsarism and the tsar would be averse to granting any change since it went against hundreds of years of tradition.

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    Some would argue that after a shocking defeat during the Crimean War; that the Tsar's motives were to strengthen structural weakness of the army, the inefficiencies of financial administration and the archaic features of serfdom. Yet as Lee commented "his measures were not intended primarily to innovate, but rather to inject new life into a flagging system."

  2. How stable was the kingdom inherited by Charles I from his father?

    First the "Act of Supremacy" which made the king "Governor of the Church", as the Catholics would not accept anyone but the pope as "Head of the Church". Secondly the "Act of Uniformity" that created a universal "Church of England" including as many people as possible within it.

  1. There were several factors that made it hard for Nicholas II to govern Russia ...

    As Russia wasn't financially secure they couldn't give support in terms of housing and provisions to the people within their country. The lack of help that was awarded to the Russians, created deep animosity towards the government officials, the working class especially, because they were constantly working and not reaping any benefits.

  2. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    The assassination of the Tsar generated a mass of insecurity and a determination to crush the opposition on behalf of the new Tsar. The creation of the Okhrana was almost immediate; this was essentially a police force that aimed at data collection on political offenders and infiltration of terrorist organisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work