• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The efforts of the British government to join the EEC in the years 1961 to 1973 were mainly a result of Britains decline as a world power Assess the validity of this view.

Extracts from this document...


'The efforts of the British government to join the EEC in the years 1961 to 1973 were mainly a result of Britain's decline as a world power' - Assess the validity of this view. Britain's economic decline during the period resulted in the continuous efforts to join the prosperous EEC. Keynesian economics wasn't an effective solution to the economic downturn, and to solve the problem, the EEC seemed like a liable solution. However, because of Anglo-American relations and the commonwealth, Macmillan's efforts to join the EEC were halted by De Gaulle's veto in 1963. Nonetheless, 10 years later, Edward Heath got Britain into the EEC due to his pro-European beliefs, as opposed to Macmillan and Wilson who were sceptical over Europe. Also, Britain's decline in international power made the British public suspicious about European integration, as the historian Paul Einzig put it, "They want to remain purely British and are firmly opposed to relinquishing any essential part of their country's absolute sovereignty", which was the reason De Gaulle vetoed Britain's application twice. ...read more.


The age of prosperity and continuous go budgets was at an end. Moreover, British exports to the Commonwealth had fallen to 43% of total exports by 1957, in addition to this; America was faced with a weakening Britain and a thriving EEC. America wanted Britain to tap into Europe's markets and changed the laws of protectionism, becoming a spokesman to America, rather than the old Anglo-American relations. In contrast to this, to combat the economic downturn Macmillan created EFTA in May 1960. However, compared to the EEC, EFTA failed in its principal aims and merely highlighted British opposition to the EEC's economic principles. As Britain's own economic problems grew and British influence in the world declined, the nation found itself outside a highly successful economic community, which proved impossible to ignore. Despite the economic advantages of joining the EEC, which could have saved the failing staple industries by giving Britain access to new markets without harmful tariff barriers, Macmillan and Wilson wouldn't compromise national sovereignty or admit Britain was in decline. ...read more.


Due to his pro-European beliefs he was prepared to put America second and wouldn't accept another veto as he believed Britain couldn't remain out of the EEC any longer. Even though De Gaulle retired in 1969 and was replaced by Pompidou, the community wasn't prepared to simply subsidize the 'sick man of Europe' and Britain had to accept harsh conditions in order to gain entry. Heath knew Europe was the only solution to solving the problems Britain faced, Macmillan and Wilson also realised this, however, Heath realised Britain's decline and was prepared to accept the terms. After 22 years since Britain's first application, Britain became a member 1st January 1973. However, Britain's membership was too late. With the European countries experiencing economic prosperity, British industries were too backward to compete within the market and it seemed the EEC wouldn't help Britain. On top of this, Britain's harsh terms damaged the British economy further, such as the Britain being forced to give up its fishing rights which was a major economic advantage for Britain, but after 1973, the fishing industry declined. In short, Britain should have joie ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay


    was producing significant quantities of coal and therefore the worldwide price dropped. The return to the Gold Standard under Winston Churchill as Chancellor meant that British exports were over priced and of course coal was one of the largest exports out of Britain.

  2. To what extent was Whig/Liberal dominance 1846-68 a result of their free trade agenda

    to left (Radicals) .They were seen as a 'curious amalgam' as a result of their different political standpoints, and the unity which the issue of free trade gave the group was vital in keeping it strong and together. The dominance of the Whig/Liberal grouping from 1846-68 was also caused by the other policies the grouping made in this period.

  1. Death is Part of the Process

    If someone wanted to hurt Will, they could guarantee he would be devastated if anything happened to his brother. "I spoke to the boss," Alex said. "He's alerted everyone, but he says we should stick to our posts. If James has been abducted, it might be a deliberate move to draw us away from Will."

  2. Warner Bros.' GoodFellas (1990) is director Martin Scorsese's stylistic masterpiece - a follow-up film ...

    Under the tutleage of Paulie and his stoolies, Henry's self-esteem is boosted as he is emancipated from all connections to his family and becomes subverted to the criminal lifestyle. He boasts of his new-found respect: "People looked at me differently and they knew I was with somebody...At thirteen, I was

  1. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    He also always confided in Lee that he longed to be good, like Aron. That's all he wanted. But, unfortunately, he despised himself. He hated himself so much that Lee suspected he enjoyed wallowing in his self-pity. It was his only protection from the outside world; a world that Cal was sure would reject him for his brother, Aron.

  2. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    The Rump did not intend the abolition of the monarchy and the declaration of the Commonwealth to be the prelude to a revolution. "The Rump's purpose was to preserve rather than to change the constitution"(Lynch). The King had tried to subvert the fundamental laws of the kingdom and impose a tyranny and thus had to be removed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work