• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

I shall use a team of my choice as a sporting example of group work and leadership

Extracts from this document...


Sport psychology By Stephen Logan For this assignment I shall use a team of my choice as a sporting example of group work and leadership. I will identify the different kind of leader within that group and the style of leadership that they have. The team I have chose to use is Manchester United; a team, which I believe, has many leaders and not just the manager and captain. A team is a group of people who must interact with each other in order to accomplish shared objectives. A team must have: > Interaction between members. > Positive feeling between members. > A collective identity, be different from others. > Share common goal, have the same objectives. Groups go through a four-stage development sequence to move from being just a collection of individuals to becoming a team: (Tuckman 1965) 1. Forming: getting to know others and the roles that they play i.e. captain, position and manager. 2. Storming: conflict between members, rebellion against leader in order to establish roles. 3. Norming: co-operation replaces conflict. Group cohesion develops. 4. Performing: primary goal for each member is group success and roles become more defined. There are many roles within a team both formal and informal: Formal roles may be: > Captain: Roy Keane > Coach: Alex Ferguson > Player's position: strikers, defenders, midfielders and goalkeepers. Informal roles may be: > Mentor: a player other people look up to such as Roy Keane. ...read more.


Typically the democratic leader: --Develops plans to help team members evaluate their own performance --Allow team members to establish goals --Recognizes and encourages achievement. The democratic leadership style is most effective when: --The leader wants to keep team members informed about matters that affect them. --The leader wants team members to share in decision-making and problem-solving duties. --The leader wants to provide opportunities for team members to develop a high sense of personal growth and job satisfaction. --There is a large or complex problem that requires lots of input to solve. --Changes must be made or problems solved that affect team members --You want to encourage team building and participation. Democratic leadership should not be used when: --There is not enough time to get everyone's input. --It's easier and more effective for the manager to make the decision. --The manager feels threatened by this type of leadership. 3. Laissez-faire: The laissez-faire leadership style is also known as the "hands-off´┐Ż style. It is one in which the manager provides little or no direction and gives team members as much freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the team members and they must determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own. This is an effective style to use when: -- Team members are highly skilled, experienced, and educated. -- Team members have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own. ...read more.


4. Leadership factors: the way that the manager controls the team can effect how you play and what your attitudes to training are. If he is a authoritave leader and is always wanting you to do it his way or no way then players will find it harder to respond to him and perform well. Within or group the factor that influenced us the most would have to have been the team factors. Each member of our group have different levels as to which they wish to attain some were happy to try for a basic grade were as others wanted to get a higher level but then felt why should they be the one to put in all the work and therefore the whole group end up getting the same grade for that piece of work. Also personal factors have influenced the way that our group functioned with people not turning in to do the work on the assignment when arranged. In comparison to Manchester united our group was a shambles we lacked the drive and determination needed in order to obtain the goals that were set. We were not structured in the processes we were going to follow and had no set plan which we were able to abide by. I think our group could have needed an authorative leader in order to reach the targets, but that said it was a good experience to be part of a group like this because now we should see that we need to put in more effort in order to succeed. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Explain how groupthink and groupshift affect group decision-making with reference to contemporary management research

    Conformity comes into play. A group member may raise questions and objections about the group's activities but on meeting a rebuff opposition often from the leader or the leader's supporters withdraw and not press the point home. Their attempt to open up discussion is too thin and insubstantial to make a difference to a fierce argument.

  2. I have chosen to observe a group of thirteen to nineteen-year olds who regularly ...

    is a member who generally assumes responsibility of leader and is quite autocratic in style and he assumed this role during this session. He did notice though, that other members were a little aggrieved by his assumption and he 'stood down' and allowed another member, A.N.

  1. Cultural Factors Relating to Fraternities

    Hazing is merely a form of artificially created hardship (Sanz B1). Fraternities help pledges become strong minded and strive harder for what is needed to be done. They are also known to create unity amongst members to become a closer family through shared experiences and bonding.

  2. C1 Analyse the factor, which contribute towards an effective team.

    The advantages of responsibilities are that if members are given more responsibility they feel they are more involved in the business. The manager might not give more work to do. The disadvantages of responsibilities are that if they don't do their work they may let their business down.

  1. Explain the effects on the team of the leadership styles adopted

    They will also be more than happy to discuss ideas of others. When they have to point out weakness of people's ideas they show a little hesitation. They also accept people's criticism of their own ideas. Consultative Consultative is when discussions especially in order to ascertain opinions or reach an agreement.

  2. Examples: Shadows of Leadership

    However, by using this strategy, Halliburton could choose where the case was filed and present their side first. According to an employment attorney (not connected to the case) by filing suit first, you can win before the other side can even speak.

  1. Managing Work Team Conflict: Assessment and Preventative Strategies

    Two individual team members are in conflict with each other. 3. A team member experiences conflict with all of the other team members. 4. The majority or the entire team is in conflict with an individual team member. 5.

  2. George Washington: America's Greatest Leader

    either, and he even asserted America's right to trade freely with both.4 Peace and neutrality between the United States and Europe continued throughout Washington's presidency and beyond. Washington realized that through his decision it was finalized that Europeans did not interfere in American affairs and vice versa.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work