• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This literature review is concerned with defining comparative politics as adiscipline.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C O M P A R A T I V E A P P R O A C H E S (Literature Review) This literature review is concerned with defining comparative politics as a discipline. Its main purpose is to try to depict views of various authors presented in texts such as "Comparative Government and Politics" by Rod Hague and Martin Harrop (V. Wright ed., 6th ed., Palgrave MacMillan), "Theory and Methods in Political Science" by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker (eds., 2nd ed., Palgrave MacMillan) and in the handout from Dr. Mark Pennington (L2, QMUL, 2004) to compare different perspectives of perceiving the comparative approaches. At the very first point I will try to define what comparative politics actually is and its purpose according to various authors and their perspectives I am about to discuss. Comparative politics, as its name suggests consists in comparing different kinds of politics, its ways of application in particular. ...read more.

Middle

The reason is the innermost want of human being to belong to a certain group of people, to be accepted and tolerated by others. So, it is, assumingly, not our need to favor any sort of institution, nor to understand the real meaning or aim of such an institution, but it is based on listening to our needs solely, to our selfish, self-interested nature. This is the main point of rational choice theory "whose central focus is the purposeful individual and his motivation and beliefs." (Pennington, 2004) Whenever we talk about this approach we have to come back againto the nature of human being, its behavior, needs and wants, which seem to be the constant cause of i.e. free-riding/collective action problems too, which evolves form this theory. Human being is, according to M. Pennington, "a maximiser of benefits over costs", (2004) while struggles to "derive benefits from a particular good without paying their full personal share of the costs." ...read more.

Conclusion

R. Hague and M. Harrop discuss the reason to study politics comparatively, the risks which come with it and the specific techniques used. Globalization is one of the examples which pose a risk and a challenge simultaneously, but the reason is perceived by Green as "nation is a cell of a larger entity with a life all its own." All the authors try to bring an understanding of studying comparative politics. Each technique the disclipline is based on has its advantages and weaknesses. M. Pennington's summarizes the main approach within a new institutionalism, but obviously, there is no only one approach which should be used. Hopkin's method are generally about the risks each of them brings considering variables and case studies, importance of number we study. Hague and Harrop's theory talks about variables, their particular use, when the outcome may be successful. I am assuming most of the theories have to be put together in order to gerenare a realistic and true outcome, what is the purpose, to understand the processes and their influence. Comparative politics is about studying the practical use of a theory to create a theory more likely to succeed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. This essay is aimed to discuss the meaning of ideology and it different uses ...

    establishment of classes' society and this can only be done through the abolition of private property and when all owns productive wealth. (A Heywood pp109-111). Therefore private property should be distributed more equally in society rather than being abolished. The difference ideology of the Marxist in social democrats is that

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    wrest it from others (Berthoin Antal 1998; Dierkes 1988; Hardy and Clegg 1996: 631). One author (Kotter 1979: 2) noted that the open seeking of power is widely considered a sign of bad management. Indeed, the authors of management literature not only skirt the behavior associated with power struggles but

  1. Free essay

    What do you consider to be the defining elements of a socialist outlook?

    However, deep ecologists also reject the capitalist economic system on principle, believing is anthropocentric and have resulted in environmental degradation. Taking all factors into account, opposition to capitalism can be seen as an important element of socialism; however, it can be seen as not an ideal element to represent the

  2. Iran Country Study

    of the members of the Guardian Council, and appoint the top echelons of the military. Because of this, the president has rather truncated powers. Within the legislative branch are various councils and assemblies that serve different purposes. The Guardian Council is a 12-member council that is half appointed by the

  1. Nigeria Country Study

    * 1960 - Independence, with Prime Minister Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa leading a coalition government. * 1983 January - The government expels more than one million foreigners, mostly Ghanaians, saying they had overstayed their visas and were taking jobs from Nigerians.

  2. Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Dr. Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

    However, his comparison of his situation to that of Hungarian freedom fighters also carries an emotional appeal in that within the word 'Adolf Hitler' comes the details of Hitler's atrocities of which we are all aware. The emotions associated with Hitler's atrocities are transferred to segregation.

  1. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    The drive towards 'globality' combines a logic of capitalist expansion with the swift development of deterritorializing media and communications technologies. But this drive is opposed by various processes and practices expressing different orders of 'locality'. Amongst these we can count the cultural identity movements that Castells focuses on, but also

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    There are several significant features. First, these parties represent "presidential coalitions" (McFaul 2000b, 13) or "parties of convenience" (Rose 2000) that were formed specifically to win the 2000 presidential election. The Fatherland-All Russia Party was formed as a coalition of the Fatherland Party, created in 1998 by Moscow Major Yuri Luzhkov, and the all Russia movement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work