• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evolutionary Explanations of Parental Investment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The parental investment theory was put forward by Robert Trivers in 1972, and argues that differences between males and females have their origins in the different amount of time, energy and effort being put into having a child. We often hear that males seem to behave in a more aggressive manner, they care more about physical attractiveness in a partner than personality, and that women value financial capacity of potential partners the most (Buss, 1989). An explanation of this is that males and females have a different amount of parental investment, and the root of the behaviour is in Darwin's natural selection theory which proposes that those who are reproductively successful and leave more offspring will have their characteristics passed on. Therefore, the aim for both males and females is to create as many living, healthy offspring as possible. A male's investment is relatively small, as he has almost no limit to how many children he can make, and therefore the best way to maximise his reproductive success is to have many matings with multiple fertile partners. ...read more.

Middle

Evidence for the theory was also found in Clark and Hatfield's studies (1989 and 1990) where male and female students were approached by strangers asking for casual s*x. Interestingly, none of the women agreed but 75% of men did, suggesting that they may want to spread out their genes between willing fertile volunteers. Trivers' theory helps us to understand the observed differences in s****l jealousy (men became more distressed at the thought of their partners being s******y unfaithful whilst women were more concerned with their male partner being in love with another person - Buss, 1993). It must be mentioned here that this type of experiment has several ethical problems, like the lack of informed consent at the beginning and distress. It may just have been that the females felt more vulnerable since they did not know the strangers and perhaps would have agreed under different circumstances. Also, the outcome of the study may have been down to biological differences in hormone levels and brain structure rather than evolutionary behaviour. ...read more.

Conclusion

An extension or even improvement of the theory is the s****l Strategies theory devised by Buss and Schmitt (1993). It argues that the parental investment theory is too reductionist and that men and women might look for both a short-term and long-term mate, and demonstrates behaviours for both; women as well as men might want to have a one-night stand for mate insurance, just in case her proper mate disappears. There has been evidence to support this (Norman and Kendrick, 2006), showing that women will look for physically attractive males especially in a one-night stand. It would seem that the parental investment theory may be rather accurate in that it explains a variety of behaviour differences between males and females, but it is almost impossible to prove and other theories such as the SS theory by Buss and Schmitt (1993) provides an answer to some of the limitations of the theory. It is likely that the two theories together provide a better explanation than the parental investment theory alone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

Although there is no explicit question given, the writer covers the evolutionary explanations of parental investment in some good detail and demonstrates good analysis throughout. The student provides thorough background information on the Parental Investment Theory put forward by Trivers ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Although there is no explicit question given, the writer covers the evolutionary explanations of parental investment in some good detail and demonstrates good analysis throughout. The student provides thorough background information on the Parental Investment Theory put forward by Trivers (e.g. “argues that differences between males and females have their origins in the different amount of time, energy and effort being put into having a child”), and what is encouraging to see is the frequent use of dates to support theories and studies – this is good as it displays detailed knowledge of these concepts, and will prove any further reading that may have been done. The major downfall of this essay is the lack of a clear introduction, although the first couple of sentences introduce the topic, they are immediately followed by a paragraph full of specific details and examples – it is important to have a separate introductory paragraph – even if very short – to set the scene for the reader, highlight the issues to be discussed, and hint at the argument you will be making. On the other hand, the student has written a very nice concluding paragraph which brings together their discussion points, providing the rationale for the decision they reach (“it is likely that the two theories together provide a better explanation than the parental investment theory alone”).

Level of analysis

As mentioned, the level of analysis is typically very strong – for example, the writer not only gives information on the theory of parental investment, but then uses existing studies to back-up the theory (e.g. Buss (1989), having conducted a commendable 33-country cross-cultural study found that men valued physical attractiveness more than women did and also valued women younger than themselves), what is also brilliant about this is example is the level of detailed provided about the study (name, date, number of countries) clearly indicating that the student knows what they are talking about. Furthermore, the student goes as far as to discuss possible limitations of these studies demonstrating good critical thinking skills (e.g. “It may just have been that the females felt more vulnerable since they did not know the strangers and perhaps would have agreed under different circumstances”). Having discussed Trivers’ theory, the writer goes one step further to point out that it does have limitations (impossible to prove, too reductionist) – again showing critical thinking skills – and then uses Buss and Schmitt (1993) Sexual Strategies theory as a potential addition/replacement for Trivers. This demonstrates originality, proves the student has thought about the topic clearly, and has drawn a valid argument – all in all a good example of critical analysis.

Quality of writing

Spelling and grammar are consistently high throughout, with correct terminology used when necessary (e.g. reductionist, investment, sexual jealousy). The writer also uses a number of different joining sentence constructions in order to make the essay easy to read, and avoids repetition, good examples include: therefore, however, this suggests, it must be mentioned, a major flaw, an extension, it seems that.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by lcarter17 07/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Causes of Aggressive Behavior

    To narrow the causes of aggressive behavior, many experts agree that the major factors that play a part in aggressive tendencies in humans can be traced to biological and psychological causes, observational and social learning, and alcohol-induced factors. Scientists have shown that there are two areas in the brain that

  2. Parental Investment iin Children - Outline of evolutionary explanations

    For example, the most common of the more dangerous complications for pregnant women, pre-eclampsia, is caused by the infant pressuring the woman's body into giving it more nutrients through the secretion of certain hormones. This heightens the woman's blood pressure, allowing more nutrient-filled blood to be passed to the foetus,

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    No one takes direst responsibility for their apathic behaviour so there is a diffusion of responsibility. Case study Latane and Darley (1968) Aim: To discover if the diffusion of responsibility hypothesis (the more people, the less likely someone is to help as the blame for not helping will be spread among all involved)

  2. Analyse the Studies into the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony

    One group was asked ?how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?? the second group was asked ?how fast were the cars going when they hit each other??.

  1. Discuss Theories of Parental Investment in Relationships

    Buss et al provides support. They found that male students showed a higher galvanic skin response (GSR -measure of emotional arousal) when asked to imagine their partner being unfaithful. Whereas female partners showed higher GSR arousal when presented with concerts about emotional infidelity.

  2. Outline and evaluate sex differences in parental investment

    This criticises the PIT as that would say that paternal investment would be greater if the child was biologically his, as males don?t want to spend resources on another man?s child, but this research suggests that men will invest equally in children that are not their own.

  1. Outline and evaluate evolutionary explanations of parental investment.

    The amount of parental investment will be different between males and females. This theory argues that differences in male and female reproductive behaviour are due to the amount of parental investments made by both sexes. Human males? parental investment is relatively small compared to human females.

  2. Discuss Sex Differences In Parental Investment

    The high cost of child rearing to women means that they want to ensure good quality offspring. They may do this by marrying a man that has good resources, so is caring and financially supportive, but then shop around for good genes from good looking men that have no resources.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work