The man on the left- advertisement textual analysis The advertisement poster made by the American Civil Liberties Union depicts a sad truth that has, and still does, affect our society: racial bias.

Authors Avatar

Daniel Longo

English 11th L&L HL

Ms. Williams

“The man on the left”- advertisement textual analysis

        The advertisement poster made by the American Civil Liberties Union depicts a sad truth that has, and still does, affect our society: racial bias. The aim of the ad is to give America the evidence that racial bias is a fact of life in America. Through the use of two pictures and a concise but imposing reference to a statistic, the advertisement successfully delivers the message that, unfortunately, the color of a men’s skin causes suspicion, in police officers in particular,  enough to violate the men’s rights and affect their judgment in their job.

        Most of the members of our society will declare not to be racist or prejudicious in any way against different races and different skin colors, but, unfortunately, people don’t always declare what they really feel. The American Civil Liberties Union wants to make us understand that although we might believe to be against racism, many people still are affected by the color of a man’s skin. The way the organization is successfully able to make their point and attempt to fight the violation of civil rights is by using a number of tools, such as the use of concise but imposing language and the use of events and facts of general contextual knowledge. The two pictures are in fact of two very important men, and in order to fully comprehend the advertisement, the audience is required to know that; on the left, we find a picture of a men with a very positive connotation: Martin Luther King, while, on the right, we find the picture of a men who has been known to terrorize the masses and put an end to human lives in  gruesome manners. However, these are not the only factors that differ the two people, the most obvious factor which does not need any knowledge whatsoever, is the difference of the color of their skin. The men who, according to the advertisement, “is 75 times more likely to be stopped by the police while driving” is the men who is seen as ‘good’ while the men on the right, although being the ‘bad guy’ is less likely to be stopped by the police. This makes the audience think about the fact that if the Police (‘the good guys’) stop the black men instead of the white, there really must be a violation of civil

Join now!

rights in the USA. Thanks to who the two men actually are, the ad is much more successful in conveying the message: if the two men shown in the ad were to be an unknown back men, and an unknown white men, the ad would have made a point, but it would not have had the impact it has by showing a ‘good’ black men and a ‘bad’ white men.

        The analyzed text adopts a conventional structural layout which has shown to be most successful: the Ogilvy method. Such method is very simple, but very effective; the basic ...

This is a preview of the whole essay