The main focus of my research is to find out whether the capacity of the STM can be improved by using chunking.
My research is an adaptation of a study by Miller and Selfridge, in their study they gave participants sentences of varying lengths, where I’ve used grouped and ungrouped letters instead of sentences.
My aim is to find out whether chunking can help improve recall in the STM.
Experimental Hypothesis – In a memory test, participants will recall more letters that have been presented in meaningful chunks, compared to letters not presented in chunks.
Null Hypothesis – There will be no significant difference in the number of letters recalled by participants who have learnt letters in chunks and those who have not.
Method
I have used the experiment method because using this method is a good way to collect data for my study as it means that my data is very reliable and I can establish cause and effect because extraneous variables are controlled. Also it allows precise measurements of the Dependant variable.
I am using the repeated measure design as it minimises the effects of participant’s variables and it requires fewer participants.
The IV is whether the letters are chunked or not on presentation.
The DV is recall, so how many letters the participant remembers in a test.
I have used 20 participants all of whom were of different ages, sex and ethnicity so that I got a wider sample. I chose my participants by using the opportunity method, I used this because it is quick, convenient and an economical method of sampling.
- Strips of paper some with chunked letters some with un-chunked letters
- Watch
- Plain answer sheet
- My participants signed consent forms and agreed to take part in my experiment.
- The first group of participants (condition A) were the group that did chunked letters.
- Participants sat down and were given standardised instructions by me.
- Each of the participants was given strips of paper with the chunked letters on.
- They were given fifteen seconds to memorise the letters.
- The strips were then taken away and replaced with blank answer sheets.
- Participants were given one minute to recall as many of the letters as they could.
- After one minute the answer sheets were collected.
- All the participants were then debriefed by me about the aim of my experiment and thanked for taking part.
- The second group of participants (condition B) were then tested in exactly the same conditions except with a list of un-chunked letters.
I tried to make sure that my experiment was controlled in the fact that I used an equal number of male and female participants. I also concealed the aim of my experiment until the end so that I avoided demand characteristics. I controlled the timing on my experiment so that it would give a more reliable source of data. And I also made sure that all letters were clear and easy to read as this might have had an effect on the older participants.
To make sure my experiment was ethical I had to make sure that the participants knew that all results were confidential, and that they could withdraw at anytime. I also had to get their consent to use their results and debrief them so that knew exactly what the experiment was for and why I needed their results.
The total number of trigrams (three letter strings) recalled in the chunked condition is 150, this is more than that in the un-chunked condition which is 108. This strongly shows that the STM capacity can be increased with chunking. The mode and median for the chunked condition are both 16 which is nearly double the mode and median for the un-chunked condition.
The mean for the trigrams is 15 compared to the un-chunked letters, the range for the chunked condition is 7 compared to 12 for the un - chunked condition. My results suggest that it is a lot harder to recall a string of letters if they are not chunked as they are not meaningful, they also suggest that by chunking letters in a meaningful way can increase STM capacity.
- Relationship of results to Hypothesis(es)
My results clearly indicate that my experimental hypothesis was right and that the participants did recall more letters when they were presented in meaningful chunks.