How far do you agree that Atwood has created not a real person but a mouthpiece for her ideas in the characterisation of Offred?

Authors Avatar

How far do you agree that Atwood has created not a real person but a mouthpiece for her ideas in the characterisation of Offred?

‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ clearly demonstrates elements of Atwood’s ideas such as gender politics and concerns with the environment. How far Atwood manipulates the characters in order to express her ideas will be explored and whether this makes Offred an implausible character.

The narrative style used in the novel, a discontinuous and short-scened  structure with time shifts, echoes the concept of a memory. The narration often delves into the past as Offred remembers her life before the oppressive theocracy was set up. These elements enable the reader to relate to Offred and her monotonous life as a handmaid. As the narration is a voice it becomes plausible that this is a real person retelling her story and not just a mouthpiece for Atwood’s ideas.

The intricate, feminine details included in the narrative such as smells and how things feel demonstrate a valid existence as the emotional elements of the character Offred are revealed;

        “Soft and dry, like papier poudre,

         Pink and powdery, from the time before.”

These images create emotion and a real person of Offred as Atwood establishes an emotional quality in her and thus makes the reader believe her to be real. This is also due to the past that Atwood establishes for Offred which gives her an identity and recognisable individuality. It can be seen by the way in which Offred talks about her daughter that she is extremely important and she is a great emotional significance in her life;

Join now!

        “My treasure…A shadow of a shadow,

 as dead mothers become. You can see

 it in her eyes: I am not there.”

This illustrates Offred’s emotional quality and demonstrates how she is not just a mouthpiece for Atwood’s ideas.

Offred’s narrative may be described as didactic. The historical notes provide an insight into the opposing view. Professor Piexoto is interested in establishing the authenticity of her tale and its value as historical evidence and not Offred’s depiction of the society through feminist imagery. Piexoto states that;

        “Our job is not to censure,

         but to understand.”

He reinforces the sexist ...

This is a preview of the whole essay