Government Intervention in the Marketplace.
Sean Karr Dr. Wehrli Economics 11-8 March 19, 2003 Government Intervention in the Marketplace Government intervention on the subject of economics has been a long and controversial battle fro those who believe that business should be heavily regulated and that it should be free to do what it wants. Never in history has any government found a happy median or some system that pleases every one. So in light of not being able to please everyone governments try to compromise and that is the best system. Governments should be involved in the economy to a point where they regulate to protect the consumer and to stay out of business when the system is working to the advantage of the consumer, but government also has a responsibility to regulate business that are easily abused and that are necessities for humans to that day of age. A consumer is anyone who is involved in paying for services supplied publicly or privately by a person or business. The government has tried many things to protect the consumer by passing acts of congress to regulating whole industries. The government has created comities like the Board of Health and Federal Consumer Information Agency to solely protect and supply the consumer with information in the business world this is a form of intervention and should be kept and is a strong point of our governments' economic involvement. If the marketplace were
In a federal system, laws are made by both state, provincial, or territorial governments and by a central government.
In a federal system, laws are made by both state, provincial, or territorial governments and by a central government. Federal political systems divide power and resources between central and regional governments. The balance of power between the two levels of government varies from country to country, but most federal systems grant substantial autonomy to state or provincial governments. Federal political systems are relatively uncommon around the world, instead most countries are unitary systems, with laws giving virtually all authority to the central government. The central government may delegate duties to cities or other administrative units, but it retains final authority. The central government in a unitary system is much more powerful than the central government in a federal system. Federalism is a system of government in which two or more separate states unite under a common central government while retaining a considerable degree of local autonomy. Unitary systems are most distinguished by a central government that possesses all government authority. This central government directly exercises its authority over the citizenry, however, it may choose to delegate responsibility for certain policy areas or activities to regional or local bodies. This delegating of government responsibilities is known as devolution. None of these sub-governing bodies possess policy area
Bill procedure Government Bills Public bills can be introduced in either one of the houses.
Bill Procedure Government Bills Public bills can be introduced in either one of the houses. Usually bills that are likely to raise political controversy start in the Commons, and those of a technical nature, and less political, often go to the Lords first. Any bills with a financial purpose are always introduced in the Commons. The procedure of passing a Public Bill is similar in both Houses. They are: . First Reading . Second Reading . Committee Stage . Report Stage . Third Reading . Passage through the other House . Royal Assent The First Reading of a public bill is just a formality. Once it has been presented, it then follows the above steps, and any amendments that are required, can be made at the committee and subsequent stages. Second Reading (House of Commons) After its first reading, the bill will have its second reading within the next two weeks. This is where the bill will have its general principles debated upon. A more detailed discussion will follow on the committee stage. Committee Stage (House of Commons) After a bill has passed its second reading, it is usually referred to as standing committee, whereby it goes through a very detailed clause by clause examination. In other cases, some bills are referred to as a committee of the whole house. The bills which have their committee stage on the floor usually come under four categories: . Bills of
The role of the Media in Jamaican Politics
THE MEDIA'S INFLUENCE ON JAMAICAN POLITICS ---A close look at the relationship between Journalists and political parties. BY: MARIE BERBICK-GRAHAM, Traditionally, the main media in Jamaica have been radio, television and newspapers. With the liberalization of the telecommunications sector, media have now expanded to include local cable stations, the Internet, community radio stations and community or regional newspapers. There are now more than 12 radio stations, three national TV stations and three major national newspapers, two of which are dailies. In addition there are several weekly tabloid publications. However this expansion of media in Jamaica has led to little change in how popular perceptions are passed on to the masses. Mainly because the media fraternity in Jamaica is quite small and it is the same crop of journalists, columnists, talk show hosts and announcers who move between the various media houses. Traditionally, the ruling political party enjoys majority support in the media. Many respected journalists are loyal to one political party or another but are not keen to publicly acknowledge that loyalty. 1It is no secret that during an election campaign, one of the groups of professionals that is targeted [by political parties] is the Journalism fraternity. Talk show hosts and columnists are the most powerful 'spin doctors' on the local media landscape
1998, Bangladesh flooding.
In 1998, Bangladesh experienced its most disastrous flooding ever. Occurring from July to mid-September, water at one point inundated 66 percent of the land. Although the country is regularly affected by various floods, such as overflowing rivers and coastal tidal rises, this flood substantially exceeded previous ones in 1954, 1974, and 1988. Crop losses were extensive. Heavy rainfall in the catchment area of the three major rivers (Ganges, Brahmaputra, Meghna), combined with above normal melting of ice in the Himalayas and an apparent rise in sea-level to create severe drainage congestion. Fifty-two of the country's 64 administrative districts were submerged at the height of the floods. The flooding caused losses to all major crops and affected production throughout the 1998-99 year. The national deficit of rice was estimated by the FAO to be 3.6 million tons. In the fall of 1998, the country faced a 22 percent shortfall between production and national consumption. Human suffering from food shortages and famine, as occurred in 1974, threatened. Twenty million people were made homeless. In response, the government mobilized local governments, non-government bodies, and international agencies to aid in food relief and subsequent rehabilitation. Initially, the scope of the emergency overwhelmed government capacity. The Disaster Management Bureau was paralyzed, failing to
What impact have government attitudes had on the changes to punishment?
Paper 1 Exam Practice O What impact have government attitudes had on the changes to punishment? Government attitudes towards crime and the causes of crime have had a direct effect on the changes to punishments. Although the word 'government' is quite a general term for whoever was running the country, it can be defined in three overall types spanning from the early 16th century to present day. During the 16th and 17th century, the country was run as an absolute monarchy, with the monarch ruling through the Devine Right of kings. As the King was supposed to have been God's representative on earth, any scepticism or criticism of their authority would be seen as heresy and even treason. The monarchy was very fearful of civil unrest, which may lead to revolt, and as the army was also a thread and had to be disbanded, it could not be relied on to put down mass revolt. This is why any sign of insurrection, however insignificant, was dealt with harshly. An example of this is Kett's rebellion of 1549. Kett, who led a band of 16,000 farmers and workers protesting about enclosure outside Norwich, was executed along with 50 other and hanged in chains after the rebellion was put down despite having pledged allegiance to the King. In Industrial Britain, the government, which was still a monarchy but with a parliament full of rich landowners making the laws, had three main purposes;
Supremacy of Parliament and Cabinet-dominated government
Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 Terms: Supremacy of Parliament and Cabinet-dominated government The Prime Minister and the Cabinet members make up the executive branch of government in Canadian Politics. The Cabinet is usually selected by the Prime Minister himself, and these individuals are usually part of the Privy Council and are advisors to the Crown. The Cabinet is drawn from the legislative assembly as a committee but at the end, it is responsible and accountable to the legislative branch of government (which includes members of the House of Commons, the Senate and the Crown, usually called the Parliament). It can be seen that the Cabinet and the PM have a lot of power but also a lot of responsibilities and the executive performs many crucial roles in the Westminster model of government. Cabinet-dominated government occurs when the executive branch has a lot of power over the happenings in government. This usually occurs when the Prime Minister and his/her party has a large majority, when there is a "knowledge" gap in the House of Commons or it depends on the availability to the prime minister of non-bureaucratic advice. The electoral process also has an influence on the amount of power the Cabinet can hold over the legislative assembly. Supremacy of Parliament was one of the main characteristics of the British constitution applicable to Canada. Parliament was
The English constitution is based on no principles at all.
The English constitution is based on no principles at all. The English constitution is not codified, unlike the majority of the European countries but this does not mean that there is no constitution nor that there is no constitution, it just merely means that they are not found in one document or a number of documents. Indeed in the absence of written constitution, Britians unwritten constitution is firmly rooted in the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. The principle that parliament is sovereign or supreme was propagated by Dicey in the ninetieth century. Dicey argued that there were two limbs to parliamentary sovereignty, namely the positive and the negative limb. The positive limb is based on the principle that parliament is omnipotent and reserves the right to make or unmake any law that they so choose. As Jennings suggests Parliament could legislate that a man was a woman or that all blue eyed babies must be put to death or ban smoking on the streets of Paris. Whether the latter would be effective or not would be another matter, but it would still be legally valid. Indeed Parliament has a number of wide powers at its discretion; Parliament can make retrospective law as was the case in Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate and the law can even have an extra-territoral effect, however, as stated in Treacy it is presumed not to unless expressly provided for. The only thing
The Constitution protects the right of Americans to ownfirearms.
The Constitution protects the right of Americans to own firearms. Written in 1789, the Constitution, and more specifically the Bill of Rights, addresses the issues that the wise men who crafted our nation felt were so important they needed to be expressly enumerated so that it would be clear to all that the citizens possessed these rights and that the state should not limit the ability of the citizens to exercise them. Along side the prohibition on the quartering of troops in private residences during peacetime, the right to a speedy trial, and trial by jury is enshrined the founder's explicit instruction that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Succeeding generations of federal judges have winnowed away at the ability of Americans to exercise that right, but it exists nonetheless, and for a very good reason. The American Revolution, the first in history where armed citizens rebelled against the abuses of the rights of man perpetuated by a colonizing power, could not have succeeded were it not for the private ownership of firearms. As Hamilton writes in Federalist 28, "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the extension of the original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers
ur Ruhe kam diese Streit nicht durch..
ur Ruhe kam diese Streit nicht durch.. Zur Ruhe kam diese Streit nicht durch wissenschaftliche Ueberzeugung des Gegners, sondern als die Zoelle des Jahres 1902 die Forderungen der Landwirtschaft erfuellten... Kehr here describes how the arguments between the aristocratic agrarian faction and the bourgeois industrial factions about the insufficiency of German food production in time of war and the problems of blockade were alleviated not by resolution of the problems, but by the tolls and tariffs of 1902 which made it possible to reform farming to some extent. The aristocratic-agrarian bloc at the War Ministry did not reckon on needing to deal with food blockades in the event of war with England as the interior ministry had anticipated a surplus in supply following the reforms. The tolls had no point but to silence the claims of those who saw the food crisis as a matter of national importance. The problem of the food problem was reraised in 1912, but again, it was "tackled" by an agency whose role was to allow people to forget it. This whole issue supports Kehr's theory about the importance of the domestic politics of Germany in her view on the outside. Ignoring Germany's geographical fatal flaw concerning the ease of blockading her, the interests of the East Elbians was placed at a higher level of importance than national security. The tolls were passed in order to
