• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters of Hal and Hotspur in Henry IV Part 1.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters of Hal and Hotspur in Henry IV Part 1 The two main characters in Henry IV Part 1 are named Hal and Hotspur. They are two very contrasting characters. Hal (actual name Henry Bolingbrook) is the son of the king, Henry IV. Hotspur (Harry Percy) is the son of Lord Northumberland. His family is very wealthy and powerful, and at the start of the play they are fighting for the King because they are good friends with him. Things soon turn sour though, when the short-tempered Hotspur, egged on by his scheming uncle, Lord Worcester, falls out with the King and vows to get revenge on him. This essay describes the numerous differences between the two young men. In his father's eyes, Hal mixes with the wrong sort of people, and this is probably true. He spends a lot of his time with thieves like Gadshill, liars like Falstaff, and drunkards like Bardolph. The King is very disappointed with the way his son behaves, and he makes this clear right at the beginning of the play. ...read more.

Middle

Hotspur is obsessed with war and politics, whereas at the start of the play it seems like Hal couldn't care less. "I love thee not; I care not for thee Kate... when I am a-horseback I will swear that I love thee infinitely" says Hotspur, who we know loves Kate very much, but when there is a battle approaching he doesn't care about anything else. Although at the start of the play Hal seems disinterested in war and politics, it later emerges that he is almost as fanatical about it as Hotspur. Hal, when he insults people, does it behind their back, and is much more subtle than Hotspur. In Act 2 Scene 4 Hal has a dig at Hotspur while laughing and joking in the tavern, whereas Hotspur criticises the King while he is just meters away from him in Act 1 Scene 3. "He... forbad my tongue to speak of Mortimer, but I will find him when he lies asleep and in his ear I'll holla "Mortimer!" ...read more.

Conclusion

A two-faced side of Hostpur emerges in Act 4 Scene 3, where he acts very warmly towards the enemy's messenger. "Welcome, Sir Walter Blunt... some of us love you well, and even those some envy your great deservings and good name." he says. Hal is also two-faced in a way, because he mixes with dishonourable people even though he doesn't even want to. Of course he pretends to want to when he is around them. Both Hal and Hotspur are admired by people on the opposite sides to them. In Act 4 Scene 1 Vernon compares Hal to the Gods, using lots of philosophical metaphors, much to Hotspur's displeasure. "Rise from the ground like feathered Mercury" he proclaims in a description of Hal. The King shows his respect for Hotspur as well by calling him "Mars in swaddling clothes". They are both respected by their enemies, and both seem to be unappreciated by their own sides. So as you can see, although Hal and Hotspur at first seem like very contrasting characters, as the play progresses you begin to notice more and more similarities between them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    At the beginning of the play, as his father points out, his reputation is the very opposite of Hotspurs. As the play goes on Hal begins to present a changed public image. The rebel Veronon describes his preparations for war in terms which depict Hal as the very soul of honour.

  2. The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I

    In light o f all this, it is obvious that Falstaff and Hotspur's ideology of honour are in direct contrast.

  1. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    One of the messages that the Duchess gives is that when she grieves for her two dead sons and for Richard's false character, she lets others know that she has known what Richard was like for a while. For example, (2:2, lines 47-61)

  2. HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT IN HENRY IV THE PRESENT ...

    Falstaff seems to be the only character who can, to a degree, escape the confines of his past. This is mainly due to his nature, and his ability to escape from situations relying on his wit. Throughout his relationship with Doll Tearsheet it would appear that Falstaff had made many

  1. To what extent does Falstaffs role transcend that of a buffon in henry IV ...

    These actions complicate our response to him. In a stable society, such actions would seriously prejudice our opinion of the fat knight. But in this play, our judgment is made much more difficult, because Falstaff's actions are, in some respects, not all that different from what others in the play are doing on a much bigger scale.

  2. How far do you agree that the ending of Henry IV (part 2) is ...

    Throughout the play the audience is made to enjoy Falstaff's character as he is humourous and creates mischief. By making this perception of Falstaff the audience may say that Hal is in the wrong for such a harsh rejection of Falstaff.

  1. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    18, which Shakespeare could have wanted Richard to include in the soliloquy because it is a feeling that many in the audience can relate to and thus feel that they can connect with him. It is at this point that we can understand why Richard feels rejected by the Yorkists,

  2. Coriolanus, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) ...

    When with the people, he suffers from loss of verbal control; he cannot stop talking, nor can he always shape whole sentences. The structure of his speech is not smoothly rhythmic and lines are crammed with thoughts and enjambments as thoughts spill over to the next line; the language seems harsh, rugged and choppy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work