• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters of Hal and Hotspur in Henry IV Part 1.

Extracts from this document...


Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters of Hal and Hotspur in Henry IV Part 1 The two main characters in Henry IV Part 1 are named Hal and Hotspur. They are two very contrasting characters. Hal (actual name Henry Bolingbrook) is the son of the king, Henry IV. Hotspur (Harry Percy) is the son of Lord Northumberland. His family is very wealthy and powerful, and at the start of the play they are fighting for the King because they are good friends with him. Things soon turn sour though, when the short-tempered Hotspur, egged on by his scheming uncle, Lord Worcester, falls out with the King and vows to get revenge on him. This essay describes the numerous differences between the two young men. In his father's eyes, Hal mixes with the wrong sort of people, and this is probably true. He spends a lot of his time with thieves like Gadshill, liars like Falstaff, and drunkards like Bardolph. The King is very disappointed with the way his son behaves, and he makes this clear right at the beginning of the play. ...read more.


Hotspur is obsessed with war and politics, whereas at the start of the play it seems like Hal couldn't care less. "I love thee not; I care not for thee Kate... when I am a-horseback I will swear that I love thee infinitely" says Hotspur, who we know loves Kate very much, but when there is a battle approaching he doesn't care about anything else. Although at the start of the play Hal seems disinterested in war and politics, it later emerges that he is almost as fanatical about it as Hotspur. Hal, when he insults people, does it behind their back, and is much more subtle than Hotspur. In Act 2 Scene 4 Hal has a dig at Hotspur while laughing and joking in the tavern, whereas Hotspur criticises the King while he is just meters away from him in Act 1 Scene 3. "He... forbad my tongue to speak of Mortimer, but I will find him when he lies asleep and in his ear I'll holla "Mortimer!" ...read more.


A two-faced side of Hostpur emerges in Act 4 Scene 3, where he acts very warmly towards the enemy's messenger. "Welcome, Sir Walter Blunt... some of us love you well, and even those some envy your great deservings and good name." he says. Hal is also two-faced in a way, because he mixes with dishonourable people even though he doesn't even want to. Of course he pretends to want to when he is around them. Both Hal and Hotspur are admired by people on the opposite sides to them. In Act 4 Scene 1 Vernon compares Hal to the Gods, using lots of philosophical metaphors, much to Hotspur's displeasure. "Rise from the ground like feathered Mercury" he proclaims in a description of Hal. The King shows his respect for Hotspur as well by calling him "Mars in swaddling clothes". They are both respected by their enemies, and both seem to be unappreciated by their own sides. So as you can see, although Hal and Hotspur at first seem like very contrasting characters, as the play progresses you begin to notice more and more similarities between them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    At the beginning of the play, as his father points out, his reputation is the very opposite of Hotspurs. As the play goes on Hal begins to present a changed public image. The rebel Veronon describes his preparations for war in terms which depict Hal as the very soul of honour.

  2. The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I

    In light o f all this, it is obvious that Falstaff and Hotspur's ideology of honour are in direct contrast.

  1. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    For example, (2:2, lines 47-61) "Duchess: ...plucked two crutches from my feeble hands..." This carries a message as here she is only talking about her two sons who are dead and has not said anything about her only family left, Richard. This shows what she really thinks about him and knows what he has done and what he is capable of doing.

  2. A comparison (up to the end of Act 3) of the 'courts' of Henry ...

    be commenc'd in stronds afar remote: No more the thirsty entrance of this soil Shall daub her lips with her own children's blood; No more shall trenching war channel her fields, Nor bruise her flow'rets wit the armed hoofs Of hostile paces."

  1. Consider How Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Character of Prince Hal and Hotspur In ...

    But he does it because he believes in it and is passionate about it. "I will ease my heart, albeit make A hazard of my head." Looking back at Act 1 we see that Shakespeare is presenting the characters of Hotspur and Prince Hal in complete contrast as we see


    In the battle of Shrewsbury he decides not to send his military forces, which ultimately leads to the demise of his son, Harry Hotspur. Therefore later in the play when the rebellion forces call upon him once again his refusal to send troops to aid his son introduces an element

  1. To what extent does Falstaffs role transcend that of a buffon in henry IV ...

    Therefore Shakespeare uses Falstaff as a counterweight between the two. When we enjoy Falstaff's actions in the tavern, Shakespeare also wants us to see how, out of this approach to life, his attempt to cheat the hostess out of money, his conduct with the conscript soldiers, and his mutilation of Hotspur's body follow quite consistently.

  2. How far do you agree that the ending of Henry IV (part 2) is ...

    Throughout the play the audience is made to enjoy Falstaff's character as he is humourous and creates mischief. By making this perception of Falstaff the audience may say that Hal is in the wrong for such a harsh rejection of Falstaff.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work