• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Shakespeare's portrayal of Hal in Henry IV Part One.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss Shakespeare's portrayal of Hal in Henry IV Part One Shakespeare wrote 10 history plays in all, 8 of these make up a series of 2 tetralogies, or sets of 4 plays each. Placing them in chronicle order, the metrologies are: (1) Richard II, Henry IV part 1, Henry IV part 2, and Henry V, (2) Henry VI part 1, Henry VI part 2, Henry VI part 3, and Richard III. Henry I part 1 was written in 1596-1597, and was and still is one of the most popular Shakespeare plays ever written. The reason it is not so popular as other plays such as Romeo and Juliet (tragedy) and Taming of the shrew (comedy) is that it is a history play. Contrary to popular belief history plays are not completely historic and do contain main humorous and romantic scenes, characters and settings. An example of this is Falstaff, adored and loved by audiences in both past and prescence. He was so popular that another 2 plays were wrote about him. (Henry IV part 2 and Merry Wives of Windsor) Although Shakespeare wished to the play as close to the historical truth as possible he also had to make sure that he did not upset the Tudors in doing so. He must infact be careful to praise the Tudors. Elizabeth was in reign and so if he had upset the queen in any way there could have been a severe price to pay. After Edward III died, his successor Richard II took over. He was later murdered and it was thought that Bullingbrook (Henry IV) had had him killed so that he could take the throne. There was still however a stronger claim to the throne, Edmund Mortimer; descendant of Lionel, Duke of Clarence. ...read more.

Middle

He questions the idea of honour and what use it has: "Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm? No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No. Honour hath no surgery then? No. What is honour?" (soliloquy) This is Falstaff's view of honour yet it is the opposite of Hal'. Falstaff is a coward, a boaster and a lyer. We see this from Hal at first yet as the play unfolds a change in Hal's character takes place and he begins to transform. On the battlefield Falstaff pretends to be dead and lies on the floor as not to be killed. He lies at the robbery of Gads hill saying that he was attacked by many men yet it was only Hal and Poins. He also lies and stabs Hotspur, now dead claiming that he had killed him when infact it was Hal. "Therefore I'll make him sure, yea, and I'll swear I killed him" After killing Hotspur Hal praises the dead man: "A kingdom for it was too small a bound. But now two paces of the vilest earth Is room enough" In this speech the word "it" represents Hotspur's ambition, he had too much and ultimately he payed the price, Hal clearly shows his countrymen that he knows greed is bad, and to look out for what happens if you get too greedy. The speech is carefully phrased and also in iambic pentameter. Hal has clearly come into his own here, and delivers a speech almost worthy of a king. It could however be argued that this it was Shakespeare's intention to portray Hal in this light to fool the Tudors into thinking that Hal had true honour. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hal overcomes and fights him temptation to enter the world of "rude society", eventually and shows that he has the qualities needed to be a fine prince and a respected King. However Hal can be seen in another light it. The honourable Hal could merely be an attempt at fooling the Tudors. Shakespeare wished to please the Tudors and not upset them, but also at the same time he wished to create an enjoyable and watchable play where more accurate portrayals of the true characters could be made. Hal can be seen as cold and detached from his companions, whom he swears to banish (Falstaff). It could be said that Hal uses people for his own personal advantage, either to aid him with his kingship or just for amusement. Hal enjoys cruel Practical jokes ( Gads hill). As mentioned earlier it seems as though Falstaff and Hal are the best of friends. It is obvious that Falstaff has true affection for Hal yet whether the feeling is mutual is uncertain. In Act 2 Scene 4 Why does Hal keep Falstaff outside the room instead of inviting him in straightaway? Why does Hal not pay homage to Falstaff on the battlefield? In the first tavern scene we see Prince Hal relationship with Falstaff. 'Fat-witted,' Prince Hal makes jokes about Falstaff being fat. Whatever Shakespeare's true portrayal of Hal was it is clear that throughout the play Hal has changed. Whether he was fit to be a king all along and he was merely waiting for the right moment at which to announce his "reformation" is unsure. However one thing for sure is that Hal's reformation was one of the greatest Themes in any of Shakespeare's plays. It not only kept the Tudors happy but the audience as well. Oliver Markham 5PMD Bradford Grammar School 371371 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I

    His constant use of "No more...." In lines 5,7 and 8, highlights his physical and mental weariness. Henry is aware of his illegal claim to the throne and the political instability of England stems from his very actions. In fact "Henry's presence on the throne troubles the notion that kings

  2. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    His cause however is right, Mortimer has more right to the throne than Henry. He is very proud and would hate to look anything but the best. At the conclusion of the play Falstaff reduces honour to an empty concept.

  1. Coriolanus is a man of action who is finally defeated by words. To what ...

    These words certainly do not lead to Coriolanus' downfall, but rather allow him to gain a prestigious title after winning a spectacular battle, demonstrating the true warrior that he is. The reason that things do start to go wrong for Coriolanus, however, is because he is not well suited to

  2. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    meant to be pure of heart and body and seen to be the weaker sex. All of this meant that Here the audience sees a very selfish Titus, even in the Hopkins adaptation where Lavinia appears to be a willing sacrifice Titus' actions can still be seen as a selfish act.

  1. "Richard III is a study in evil." Discuss Richard's role as a tragic hero.

    But his evil nature was present in the play from the beginning as in his first soliloquy he states that he was ?determined to prove a villain.? It could be argued that his evil nature should be ignored as he was evil because of the ?dreadful circumstances which alone made such actions ? possible? (Peter Hall).

  2. With close reference used to dramatic methods, discuss Shakespeares portrayal of Hotspur in Act ...

    Hotspur is known to be a brave, ruthless warrior in battle. His short temper and reckless attitude has not only gained himself a nickname, but also a rash status. Hotspur?s best trait, his boldness and quick temper, is also his worst flaw, as he may be valiant in battle but cannot manipulate or work with allies, and is very tactless.

  1. With close reference to dramatic methods, discuss Shakespeares portrayal of Hotspur in Act 1 ...

    He cannot wait to go to battle. He lives for war. Hotspur?s dialogue in this scene is very typical as he is a very detailed speaker and can use words powerfully, but he has a hard time keeping his temper and is always interrupting others.

  2. Write a dramatic monologue in the style of Aaron reflecting on the motivation for ...

    I have repeated the word ?hole? throughout this monologue because I realised a lot of the main events that occurred during Act 2.3 revolved around the idea of a hole/pit/ditch; ?Metamorphosed into the Goths rape hole.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work