• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prose Criticism of Chuck Palahniuk - Invisible Monsters.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Close Text Analysis - Prose Criticism Chuck Palahniuk - Invisible Monsters. (See enclosed extract) Comment on the effectiveness of this as an opening. The purpose of the first few paragraphs of any novel is to set the basic scene, to introduce main characters, and - most importantly - to make the reader carry on reading! If one starts reading a book and is not gripped by some aspect of the story or characters within the first few pages, many will abandon it in favour of something more engaging. The opening of Invisible Monsters does all of these things and more. It is narrated by one of the main characters, and another two are introduced within the first few paragraphs. Here the narrator tells you quite openly, "this is called scene setting: where everybody is, who's alive, who's dead." This sentence in itself prompts one to read on, if only to find out who is dead. In fact, the first paragraph asks a whole hoard of questions in the reader's head: who is alive and dead? Who is Evie Cottrell? Who is the narrator? ...read more.

Middle

The first character to be mentioned is Evie Cottrell; the scene is set at her wedding reception, and we meet her standing on a staircase, "naked inside what's left of her wedding dress, still holding her rifle." The narrator does not seem at all sympathetic to Evie in her description, and in fact there is a certain amount of distaste in the way, further down the page, we are told, "You can trace everything about Evie Cottrell's look back to some television commercial for an organic shampoo" - suggesting that Evie is defined more by looks and her outer image than intelligence. The structure of this novel is very fragmented. Paragraphs are short and choppy - in some cases only a few words - and the non-linear narrative again enforces the superficiality of the characters. The writing is quite plain in its wording and there is little imagistic language (though Brandy is said to be "gushing" her insides out). The vocabulary is colloquial and varies - sometimes using a few simple ("some big West Hills wedding reception") and sometimes opting for more descriptive, "intelligent" words ("give me rampant intellectualism as a coping mechanism"). ...read more.

Conclusion

This is effective not only in that it allows the reader to see how the narrator feels without resorting to "I feel..." (Which would be rather out of character for these people", but it also likens the whole scene to a photo shoot, making it seem that everyone is acting a part - which, of course, they are. It begins the idea that all of these characters are fake and perhaps not what they seem, but rather hiding behind the model's fa�ade of "Give me..." In conclusion, this novel opening is very effective. It introduces the characters and scene is such a way that leaves the reader with numerous questions regarding not only the outcome of the present situation, but also how the situation came about. Who are these people? Why is the house on fire? Why is Evie half burned out of her dress and half way down the stairs with a rifle in her hand? Why did she shoot Brandy? And why is the narrator calmly thinking of dabbing club soda on the bloodstains? It certainly makes the reader want to turn the page to find out just what is going on in this rather twisted world we are being drawn into. Vicky Charles 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Ian McEwan section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Ian McEwan essays

  1. Discuss the relationship between Keith and Stephen that is presented in the first Six ...

    He wanted to go home but Keith tempted him to stay by spotting his mother. Stephen liked to be involved and even wrote down '1217', which Keith directed him to, but their boredom did vanish as well as their 'mutual peevishness' and his 'unbelief,' this shows the reader that they

  2. "This (novel) is a failure, and had to be, since it was written by ...

    The impersonal narrator would be of Billy's where itIt describes a story of a man who fought in World War Two and a survivor of the Dresden firebombing. The entire first chapter is all spoken through Vonnegut's voice describing his persuasion of producing a book on Dresden.

  1. Compare Junot Diaz's use of narrative techniques to present the alienation of the characters ...

    This rejection particularly evokes a sense of pathos in the reader because Oscar is rejected by the social group he belongs to by birth. This is made all the more poignant by Oscar's reply of "Soy Dominicano. Dominicano Soy"; he is trying to establish the most basic of connections with the other characters by communicating in their native language.

  2. "The double-faced Hazard/Chance family is served up the reader as a model for Britain ...

    However, Grandma can pass as upper class when she wants which is part of Carter's use of the "carnivalesque", turning the norms of society upside-down; this ridicules the dividing class system in Britain. Indeed Lady A can be lower class.

  1. Snowdrops (short story) analysis

    He seems brave because he is ready to speak when he is meant to be silent. Edmund also has less sense of wonder about the snowdrops. Edmund also knows about the death of the Meredith boy, and that the procession is for his funeral Gerald is more na�ve and childlike.

  2. Critical analysis of the opening chapters of Waterland.

    The mystery around this figure is puzzling, Swift leaving the reader feeling interested and inquisitive about the character. However, we find the main character to be Tom Crick, the narrator of the book. He is an intellectual man, and also a history teacher.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work