• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the Crimean War a turning point in the development of Modern Russia?

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Crimean War a turning point in the development of Modern Russia? The Crimean war was a conflict that occurred between the Russian Empire, and an alliance that was made up of the French Empire, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Sardinia. The occurrence of the Crimean War, which took place in 1854, can in some ways be seen as the trigger point of the changes, which began to take place in Russia after 1854. Most definitely the Crimean war itself had lead to Russia encountering a loss of almost 500,000 men, all due to the selfish acts of wanting to gain influence in the Balkans and the Turkish regions. In addition, the Crimean war is considered to be one of the first 'modern' wars. The Crimean war managed to bring about Social Change and Political Change in Russia. One of the main changes that took place was the Russian abolition of Serfdom, as the defeat in the Crimean War as well as the realisation, which was brought upon the Russian government. Many Historians will argue that the Crimean War managed to act as a trigger point for the radical changes which occurred, however many other argue against this that the changes which took place would have happened regardless because of Russia's radically changing society. ...read more.


thus adapt to it than Nicholas II had done, but furthermore the Crimean war was the major reason behind the changes made to the way in which the government was organised and ruled the country. The Zemstvos was a new system of local administration which helped to lead to further improvement in the Russian local services, as well as the reduction in the influence of the landlords which helped to make the peasants less tied to the outdates serfdom system. The introduction of the Zemstvos helped with increasing and improving the Government control and the Government involvement in how the countryside was further run. The basic unit behind the Zemstvos council was the district council. Those who were to be apart of the Zemstvos were chosen through elections and landowners, the townsmen and the peasants would vote for the representatives to be apart of the council. However the main role of the Zemstvos was associated in the more local matters of Russia, rather than the political matters of Russia. The introduction of the Zemstvos was still seen as a dramatic step that Russia were undertaking, in breaking down the autocratic system, and allowing people to have the freedom from the overpowering class system. ...read more.


It had to learn from the Victor countries; and what had given them their dynamic was liberal- capitalist civilisation, which had created the wealth, technology and ´┐Żlan that had proved unbeatable in the Crimea. The point was to borrow selectively rather than to imitate." This enables the importance that the Crimean War had, but also however further helps to emphasise the limitations as the vast amounts of change. This quotes states how Alexander II was committed to the autocratic principle, however after the Crimean War, he was committed to progressing with the change in order to help improve and strengthen Russia. As Russia had been defeated, the after affects of the Crimean War helped to reflect how other countries were doing well, and thus also reflecting the reasons as to why they had more success compared to Russia. Not only did the defeat in the Crimean War help to reveal the gaping weaknesses in the Army, "The state arsenals had less than half the munitions they were supposed to have". Overall the Crimean war can be seen as a significant reason as to why Russia soon, after 1854 came about with many reforms, which began to take progress. The Crimean war, not only helped to reveal Russia its weaknesses, but reflect what other countries were more modernised in, that helped them to gain victory, and the traditional ways that Russia still expected to have success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far do you agree that the Crimean War was the major turning point ...

    Whilst Napoleon revolutionised the way war was waged in terms of improving what had been used for a century, the new found industry completely changed how war was fought. This new found industry included the introduction of the rifle, newer artillery, advances in military technology, and the technological advances in railway and electric telegraph.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    They preferred to stockpile their crops in case of a future poor harvest. * So-called Nepmen were making a lot of money and this was creating further disquiet in the ranks of the Party. * Electrification and investment in state-owned heavy industry was growing, but not as fast as many would like.

  1. The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development ...

    Even though it was Lenin who created a one party state it was Stalin who removed any in party dissent and public debate through the purges and use of the Gulag. This political change was not particularly great as saw no change in government and was just an extension to

  2. Vietnam war

    * 1965- LBJ approved Feb. 26 to send 1st troops - two marine battalions (3500 marines) arrive on Mar. 8 at Danang. * December 1964- 16,000 US troops; By January 1968- well over 500,000 * Operation Rolling Thunder (1965-1968): restricted, sustained bombing campaign.

  1. How far was the death of Alexander II a turning point in the development ...

    Anti-Semitic beliefs also introduced the May Laws in 1882, with the purpose of imposing condition on the Jews as a people for their role that they had played in the assassination of his father, Alexander II. After the assassination of Alexander II, many brutal attacks were made against Jewish people, and they faced humiliation as well as abandonment.

  2. How far did the reforms during the period 1826-39 contribute to the eventual fall ...

    Ministers visiting Paris understood the basis of European superiority and in turn saw the need to drastically alter their own system. The Janissary purge of 1826 was first of the Sultan's drastic alterations. It was impossible to introduce military and administrative reform whilst faced with the staunch opposition of the conservative ulema [Islamic religious authority], supported by the Janissaries.

  1. What were the mains reasons for the emancipation of Serfs in Russia?

    as much our liberation as theirs: for at present we are under the yoke of a law that destroys still more in us than the serfs any human quality.[3]? In this part of the memorandum, the writer explained how the serfdom was not moral.

  2. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    This change had a great impact on the people as, hypothetically, they had the power in 1917. This can be seen as a large number of factories had been taken over by the workers through elected committees and peasants - after they melted away from the army - expropriated land

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work