• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the Crimean War a turning point in the development of Modern Russia?

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Crimean War a turning point in the development of Modern Russia? The Crimean war was a conflict that occurred between the Russian Empire, and an alliance that was made up of the French Empire, the British Empire, the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Sardinia. The occurrence of the Crimean War, which took place in 1854, can in some ways be seen as the trigger point of the changes, which began to take place in Russia after 1854. Most definitely the Crimean war itself had lead to Russia encountering a loss of almost 500,000 men, all due to the selfish acts of wanting to gain influence in the Balkans and the Turkish regions. In addition, the Crimean war is considered to be one of the first 'modern' wars. The Crimean war managed to bring about Social Change and Political Change in Russia. One of the main changes that took place was the Russian abolition of Serfdom, as the defeat in the Crimean War as well as the realisation, which was brought upon the Russian government. Many Historians will argue that the Crimean War managed to act as a trigger point for the radical changes which occurred, however many other argue against this that the changes which took place would have happened regardless because of Russia's radically changing society. ...read more.


thus adapt to it than Nicholas II had done, but furthermore the Crimean war was the major reason behind the changes made to the way in which the government was organised and ruled the country. The Zemstvos was a new system of local administration which helped to lead to further improvement in the Russian local services, as well as the reduction in the influence of the landlords which helped to make the peasants less tied to the outdates serfdom system. The introduction of the Zemstvos helped with increasing and improving the Government control and the Government involvement in how the countryside was further run. The basic unit behind the Zemstvos council was the district council. Those who were to be apart of the Zemstvos were chosen through elections and landowners, the townsmen and the peasants would vote for the representatives to be apart of the council. However the main role of the Zemstvos was associated in the more local matters of Russia, rather than the political matters of Russia. The introduction of the Zemstvos was still seen as a dramatic step that Russia were undertaking, in breaking down the autocratic system, and allowing people to have the freedom from the overpowering class system. ...read more.


It had to learn from the Victor countries; and what had given them their dynamic was liberal- capitalist civilisation, which had created the wealth, technology and ´┐Żlan that had proved unbeatable in the Crimea. The point was to borrow selectively rather than to imitate." This enables the importance that the Crimean War had, but also however further helps to emphasise the limitations as the vast amounts of change. This quotes states how Alexander II was committed to the autocratic principle, however after the Crimean War, he was committed to progressing with the change in order to help improve and strengthen Russia. As Russia had been defeated, the after affects of the Crimean War helped to reflect how other countries were doing well, and thus also reflecting the reasons as to why they had more success compared to Russia. Not only did the defeat in the Crimean War help to reveal the gaping weaknesses in the Army, "The state arsenals had less than half the munitions they were supposed to have". Overall the Crimean war can be seen as a significant reason as to why Russia soon, after 1854 came about with many reforms, which began to take progress. The Crimean war, not only helped to reveal Russia its weaknesses, but reflect what other countries were more modernised in, that helped them to gain victory, and the traditional ways that Russia still expected to have success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Anyway, it was essential to have some grain stored in case there was a bad harvest the next year. * Most peasants were basically conservative. They had supported the Bolsheviks in order to get rid of their landlords and to get their hands on land.

  2. How far do you agree that the assassination of Alexander II in 1881 was ...

    Another turning point that did not carve out as much change as would be expected was the revolution of 1905. It was the result of years of disappointment in reforms that did not go far enough, of a disastrous and humiliating war defeat, of appalling conditions in both the countryside and the towns and of an inept Tsar.

  1. The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development ...

    Even though it was Lenin who created a one party state it was Stalin who removed any in party dissent and public debate through the purges and use of the Gulag. This political change was not particularly great as saw no change in government and was just an extension to

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    was not pushed as far as it could have been so after the Seven Weeks War the artillery regiments of the army were being retrained to use the new Krupp field guns and therefore became more effective at using them.

  1. Vietnam war

    * 1964- Gulf of Tonkin incident. Congress passed Bundy resolution Aug. 5 giving the President the authority to take "all necessary measures" to repel attack and prevent further aggression. LBJ did not seek declaration of war or total mobilization for victory - instead, waged a limited war "in cold blood".

  2. Free essay

    To What Extent Was The Crimean War A Series Of Accidents? ...

    As a result, one country whose interest grew was Austria, who certainly did not share Russia's efforts to support fellow Slavs, for fear it may affect Austria's own population of Slavs. Furthermore, the Austrians sought to maintain the Ottoman Empire, as they regarded it as a useful defence against Russian expansion.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    which had belonged to the state, the church, nobility and gentry, showing that they were no longer under autocratic rule and were in a better position socially. This Romanov success is reinforced by Christopher Hill[4], who wrote, ?Lenin deserves great credit in leading the oppressed of Russia?.

  2. What were the mains reasons for the emancipation of Serfs in Russia?

    This writing reflects the emergence of these men from the early 19th century, which is opposed to serfdom for ideological reasons. Koshelyov while using arguments of economic self-interest also claimed that the landowners themselves were ceasing that they had a moral right to own other human beings like chattels.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work