• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The nuclear family is considered the 'ideal'. Why and for whom?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The nuclear family is considered the 'ideal'. Why and for whom?" In 1949, Functionalist George Murdock defined the family as "a social group characterized by common residence, economic cooperation, and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children". In this description Murdock is describing a family structure called the nuclear family. The nuclear family is the most common definition of a family, which consists of two parents and their children. It was once considered ideal by society but is now facing a decline due to the rapid change of trends in society today. These trends in issues such as divorce and religion are some of many linked to the decline of the nuclear family in society. I will be taking a closer look at these issues, considering Functionalist and Marxist views, and also taking into account other family structures whilst tackling the question of why and for whom the nuclear family is ideal for. Functionalists believe that each part of society has a function, very much like a human body. Using the example of a human body, functionalists believe that the nuclear family is ideal as it is at the heart of society. ...read more.

Middle

An example of this is the generic cereal advert where there is a middleclass housewife, child and a businessman husband always seemingly rushing off to work - this is a typical example of the media suggesting the idea of the nuclear family, and also an example of how old fashioned conjugal roles are still being presented to us. Although, the statistics suggest that despite the media's subtle hints that tell us how to behave and live our lives, perhaps as a society we have become more intelligent and aware, and this is why we chose to live more liberally - the rising awareness of our place in society could pose as quite a threat to the Capitalist society in the future. According to Parsons, the family's two main functions are "primary socialization and personality stabilization of adults" (Parsons and Bales 1956), this makes the nuclear family extremely important for functionalists because without it individuals would not know how to conform in society, and adults would not have the emotional support necessary to cope with everyday life, this would result in the system losing its organisation and order. Marxists value family as a means of keeping society within their own class tiers, protecting private property and fuelling the economy. ...read more.

Conclusion

I personally think that socialising children in an extended family environment offers a much richer experience of socialisation and upbringing in terms of education, nurture, security and finance. Reflecting on the research present in this essay, it seems clear that Functionalists consider the nuclear family as ideal because it provides an environment that is essential to creating a working society through socialisation provided by two parents and holding together traditional and moral values of the responsibility of marriage and family life. Marxists neglect many aspects of the family as a social institution in contrast to functionalists, but see it as support for a capitalist society and a means for passing down property and keeping class differences and wealth within the bourgeoisie. I disagree with functionalists and think if evolution within species is a way of improving and bettering, then the evolution of society which has shown diversity in family structure is also an improvement and is what society needs in order to progress and better itself. In conclusion the nuclear family is considered the ideal due to old fashioned traditional values and what the demands of society needed in the early 1900s, in modern society statistics show that society can survive without the nuclear family being the prominent structure, and so it is no longer vital to the family institution or needed for a functioning society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    The existence of solo living, cohabitation, serial monogamy and gay couples are a serious factor in all of this. There have been many changes within society on what a family actually is or how it is interpreted. With modern society as it is today people have their own beliefs and opinions and are much more relaxed about the family.

  2. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    It has been suggested that increasing divorce rates and co-habitation have contributed to diversity within the family structure (Boh, 1989). It was extremely difficult to divorce up until the Divorce Reform Act was introduced in 1969 and came into effect in 1971, this then heralded a change of attitude with no attribution to blame.

  1. Outline and discuss the view that the nuclear family is the ideal family

    They believe that all other arrangements are deviant and a threat to society. Feminists however disagree with the new right view as Abbott and Wallace 1992 see the New Right as a form of patriarchy. Attacks on single parent families imply that a women's place is within the home.

  2. Decline of nuclear family

    deviancy and the DSS survey found that 90% of single parents did not want to be in receipt of benefits and 55% would be encouraged into work if there was adequate provision for day care. The idealism of these approaches is countered by many social scientists who believe that the nuclear family can be extremely damaging for its members.

  1. Mommy Wars. Working and stayathome moms are fighting it out over who is ...

    William D. Tammeus who believes that stay at home moms offer more to a child development and mothers should not work (Steiner 26). Mothers at home are better for the child. ?You don?t really understand human nature unless you know why a child on a merry-go-round will wave at his

  2. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    Murdock definition of the family includes at least one male, however significant proportion of black families in the island of west indies and central America do not include adult male.

  1. Examine the main trends in births and deaths in the UK since 1900.

    Another factor would be that children have become and economic liability such as the laws which meant children would be dependent on their parents for longer and the norms which meant parents had to provide for their children in terms of material that the cost of bringing up children has risen.

  2. Sociology and the Family

    as beneficial for society. Sociologist Talcott Parsons (1956) professed ?Only the nuclear family unit could effectively provide the achievement orientated and geographically mobile workforce required by modern industrial economies? (p. 67). Functionalist theory is generally critiqued by Marxists, feminists and historians alike.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work