Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and women are treated differently from the general public in proceedings that have their origin on the field of play.
Sports Assignment Question 2 Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and women are treated differently from the general public in proceedings that have their origin on the field of play. Answer Sport plays a major part in the culture of today's society. Many people spend considerable time in front of the television, in sports grounds and traveling all over the country to support their respective club whether it be football, rugby, cricket or netball etc. However whilst playing, spectating or just generally being involved in a sport, things can go wrong and this very often results in an action in the civil or criminal courts. Sporting incidents should be dealt with like any other civil or criminal action, however there is evidence this is not happening in many cases in both areas of law. There can be several areas of civil law where claims can be made. These are Negligence, occupier's liability, defamation, nuisance, trespass and animals. However not all these will need to be looked at, the main ones being Negligence and occupiers liability. It is in the area of negligence that I will look at the sporting cases and how they differ from non - sporting cases of civil wrongs. I will be looking at participators, clubs, referees and spectators. In the second section I will be looking at negligence and injuries in football and how
European law
In order to explain and evaluate the role and jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice1 I shall discuss the provisions of the European Community2 Treaty, which clearly provide for individuals to enforce rights derived from European Community law that are limited in their scope. This will be followed by the role of ECJ and how it has developed a number of principles that widen this scope. These are the doctrines of supremacy and direct effect, which are established to give individuals rights to enforce the European Union3 law. On the other hand, criticising the fact that that it restricts individuals rights in respect of challenging their decision. The European Union is a unique partnership in which many countries work closely together for the benefit of their citizens. Currently there are 27 member states of the EU, who have agreed to work collectively on issues such as common interest. The central purpose for the EC is to achieve a deeper economic and political integration, ('The ever closer union'). The EU desires for individuals to rely on the EU law in order to enclose uniformity hence enabling everyone to integrate in a common market. The common market, aims to increase a balanced growth on an economic and social level in respect of each member state. ECJ is one of the official institutions of the Community Treaty and plays a major part in the development
"The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."
Elements of the law of contract Zone A examination paper Question 1 "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts." Consideration is probably regarded as one of the most controversial issues in the law of contract. The traditional and/or orthodox doctrine is based on the principle of "reciprocity", which seems to suggest that a promise given should be exchanged for something in return. The requirement of Consideration was established since the sixteenth century in Common Law. The first mention of which had been in the form of quid pro quo, inter alia, a promise for a promise, and later, it was acceptable that even a detriment or forbearance like fulfilling the promise to marry such as in the case of Shadwell v Shadwell[1860] would be sufficient consideration. Consideration was first associated with debt such as in the Pinnel's case and had subsequently spread to other simple contracts. This has been criticized by Lord Mansfield in 1756, and was in view that it could only be treated as evidence of the parties' intention and held that a moral obligation should be sufficient consideration. It was only in the case of Eastwood v Kenyon[1840] that Lord Denman confirmed that the law required some factor additional to a defendant's promise, which is, consideration, whereby the promise becomes legally binding. So, if a
‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for and against this statement in relation to the recent changes proposed and the relevant literature
'Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice' Analyse arguments for and against this statement in relation to the recent changes proposed and the relevant literature Jury trials have become a contentious point within the English legal system since the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, or the Runciman Commission, made its report in 1993 (James & Raine, 1993:40). The history of trial by jury can be traced back to the county assize courts and the county quarter sessions of the eighteenth century, where jury trial was used in addition to the presence of judiciary. They were there for the purpose of active participation - interrupting proceedings to ask questions and so on. Since the 1700's however, the jury have gradually become an 'audience' who, despite the entitlement to ask questions at any time, generally do not exercise the right (Emsley, 1997:75). The courts of the time were notoriously corrupt, and juries were a means of the public holding an element of control in the criminal justice system. Trial by jury has changed little in format since its introduction over two centuries ago. It is still a panel of twelve lay-persons, made up of those who are willing to sit on the jury. Under English law: '..the jury system gives ordinary persons a part to play in the administration of justice.' (Keenan, 1998:95). At present, 'ordinary persons'
LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case
Title: LAW REPORT on Macgregor's case The Problem Peter booked a room for a week at MacGregor's Hotel. At the reception desk, where he made the booking, was a notice in the form laid down by the hotel Proprietors Act 1956 limiting the hotel's liability for loss of, or damage to guest's property. Peter asked the receptionist to look after his expensive Olympus camera but she refused saying that there was no room in the hotel safe. On the second night of his stay he invited his friend Beatrice to dinner in the hotel's restaurant. At dinner, without consulting Beatrice, Peter ordered Helford oysters for both of them. The oysters that were served to them in fact came from Whitstable and several of them were bad. Later in the meal Beatrice, already beginning to feel the effects of the oysters, left table in search of a lavatory. On her way there, suddenly overcome by dizziness, she tripped on a piece of torn stair carpet and fell heavily, breaking her arm. The meal was abandoned and Peter returned to his room hungry and bad tempered only to discover that his Olympus camera had been stolen. Being the defence advice MacGregor about his legal liabilities. Introduction This brief advises MacGregor as to the legal liabilities he faces as a consequence of the incidents as detailed above. It is advised that if this matter proceeds to court, which is likely, then Beatrice's
the english legal system unit1 assignment4
(a) Describe the present organisation of the legal profession (Solicitors, Barristers and Judges). To what extent is this form of organisation capable of satisfying the legitimate expectations of those using or involved with the legal profession? In order to address this question I endeavour describing the present organization of the legal profession namely the roles of Solicitors, Barristers and Judges, and the ways in which they interlink with one another within the legal system. In turn I will assess whether the present organisation is capable of satisfying the legitimate expectations of those using or involved with the legal profession. There are many differences between the English Legal System which derives from the common law, and law operating in other countries. For example with that of Roman law which is the system adopted by the majority of countries in Europe. Primarily it is imperative to appreciate that the legal profession can be divided up under two main headings namely, Solicitors and Barristers. Each group has its own duties and functions and its own controlling body. The two professions are separate and distinct, different governing bodies control them, their qualification requirements are different and their traditions are different. One cannot be both a Solicitor and a Barrister. Out of the two, the Barrister is the 'senior' profession, although many
Common Law and Equity
Outline the development of common law and equity. A The Law in England didn't come about all at once, but has developed over the centuries. There are 5 different sources of law: Customs, Judicial decision, Acts of Parliament, Delegated Legislation and, most recently, European Law. However, new law is still being created today. The law as we know it today all started in 1066, when William the Conqueror invaded England. He found a country with no single system of law, just sets of customary rules which differed from area to area. This was due to the different invaders who had settled in different parts of England, bringing their laws with them. William decided to set events into motion that helped bring about the system we have at present. William introduced the feudal system, in which all land belongs to the king, and he slowly started to gain control of England. He then split the land up and granted parts of the land to people who supported him and who were willing to grant him services, e.g. barons. He then made them pay taxes to him yearly. They in turn granted land to their followers and then them to theirs. This meant that the king had gained control of the whole country. The King's Justice was introduced for any landholder who had a problem that could not be sorted with their landowner. They were able to apply directly to the king, and William made himself available
AS LAW -JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
What is meant by judicial precedents and that judges "are not in liberty to reject them"? (a)Precedent is a law which has been created and is used to make decisions on cases. There are four types of precedent; judicial precedent is when past decisions made by judges are used to create law for future judges to follow. This part of the law is called case law and is used today. If a precedent is bound or binding then this means that a judge must use a previous case and are tied into it and cannot ignore the precedent. If a precedent is persuasive this means that a judge can ignore a past case but can choose to use the decision if they are persuaded that the principles are correct. Finally if you choose to follow a precedent then this is the process of using a past precedent in a future similar case. The Doctrine of Stare Decesis is when cases are treated alike. In order to achieve cases being treated alike, the system was in need of rules. These laws created the source of law known as precedent. In order to create a precedent a judge must make a judgement recorded for future judges. The judgement can be divided into two areas; Ratio Decidendi which is the reason behind the decision. This is part of the judgement that sets out the core of the decision and the reason behind it. It is part of a decision which a future case must be decided by. Secondly a case can be decided on by
Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 marks)
Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 marks) Article 14 of the European convention on Human rights protects individuals from discrimination. Traditionally English law has intervened to control discrimination in a very limited way, it is initially applied only to the areas of race and sex and only in relation to discrimination for certain purposes. E.g. they targeted race discrimination after WW2 when we had significant immigration from the commonwealth. Whereas the coverage is much larger today and broadly apply to employment discrimination, housing, education and the provision of services. The English law previously provided no remedy against unjustifiable discrimination, therefore in Applin v Race Relations Board (1975) Lord Simon referred to the "unbridled capacity to discriminate" at common law. This was in line with the traditional civil liberties in Britain and the view that an individual could do anything that the law does not prohibit. Therefore if sexual discrimination were to be tackled legislation would have to be passed. The First but limited attempt to prevent racial discrimination was the Race Relations Act 1965 which was later followed by the Race Relations Act 1968 which had a wider scope and extended this prevention of discrimination in law into further areas. On the other hand in areas such as sex
English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. For example, the courts have often explained that there is no legal duty upon a stranger to rescue a drowning child. Consider whether the current legal principles governing omissions are satisfactory (50 marks)
‘English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. For example, the courts have often explained that there is no legal duty upon a stranger to rescue a drowning child.’ Consider whether the current legal principles governing omissions are satisfactory (50 marks) The term Actus Reus is the Latin translation of ‘Guilty Act’. The Actus Reus of an offence concerns all those elements of the offence not relating to the defendants state of mind, the Mens Rea. For the Actus Reus the act or omission must be a positive voluntary act on the part of the defendant. If the defendant has no control over his actions then he has not committed the offence. The Actus Reus must also be Positive except in certain cases; this is the area of law that states for someone to commit an offence they must positively cause an act and not an omission to act, The law also states that there is no legal duty upon a stranger to rescue a drowning child. On the other hand, as there are several areas of law, 5 implemented by courts and 1 implemented through parliament, where a duty to act is existent there is often uncertainty on behalf of the defendant that they were under a duty to act in the first place. This could be solved by putting in a ‘good Samaritan’ law such as is in place in
