• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the UK have a 'constitution'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does the UK have a 'constitution'? Does it Matter? There are two meanings to the word constitution the first is that It will contain all of the rules for the organisation of the state.and secondly It will usuall be 'entrenced' which means that it is hard to change. The constitution of a country is a set of rules regulating the powers of its government and the rights and duties of its citizens. In all but a few democracies in the world, the nation's constitution can be found in a single document. The exceptions are Israel, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. As a result, people sometimes say that we in Britain do not have a constitution. On the other hand people say the United Kingdom does have a constitution; it is just a little hard to track down. People also frequently say we have an 'unwritten constitution' in the United Kingdom. As you can see from all these views it makes it a little confusing to whether or not UK has a written constitution or not. There are historical reasons why we have no written constitution; Britain has not been conquered since 1066, despite the two World Wars, Britain has been stable and has had a responsible government for hundreds of years. ...read more.

Middle

Recently, the Government has been accused of decreasing its accountability through various agencies by allowing them to carry out Government policies without the agency directors being held accountable for their mistakes; a written constitution could prevent this and make Parliament and democracy more accountable to themselves and the public. Parliamentary sovereignty is slowly diminishing in Britain, and a written constitution would not only decrease Government sovereignty but also increase sovereignty of the electorate and the judicial system. At the moment, if the Government wanted to modify or add to the unwritten constitution, they can do it simply by passing an Act; this may suggest that we have an elective dictatorship in theory where the Government exercises a kind of dominant influence over Britain. An inflexible, written constitution would evolve more power into the people and the courts. This would be especially beneficial with Europe in mind; Britain is the only member in the EU without a written constitution, and a written constitution may increase our sovereignty within Europe. Before we decide if UK should have a consititution we should see the main functions of any well worked constitution they are: > To distribute power within the political system > To limit the ...read more.

Conclusion

If we adopted a written constitution and amended it whenever necessary, there would hardly be any difference to the present constitutional system. In conclusion Altogether, a written constitution would bring many economical, social and political benefits, and be a worthwhile move for the future of Britain. I also think that a written constitution would provide our country with greater accountability and democracy. I believe that in order for a written constitution to work in the United Kingdom the written constitution needs to be enforced. That enforcement would comes through the court system with interpretations being made most frequently by the highest court in the country. is a written Constitution a wise choice for the UK ? Obviously, implementation of laws such as the European Human Rights declaration can be considered a form of a written Constitution. However, the experience of other common law jurisdictions should be weighed in the debate. I do not believe there is a simple answer regarding the choice of a written or unwritten constitution, but any changes should be weighed against the advantages and disadvantages of the countries that have a written constitution. ?? ?? ?? ?? Public Law I (LL1123) K0200720 Jayshree Patel 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    and deem them unconstitutional. They now are in effect shaping the constitution by deeming certain things unconstitutional. They also have the power of constitutional interpretation which allows them to apply the constitution to present days situations. These interpretations can have huge effect across the whole of the US.

  2. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    Further, the President can veto a piece of legislation from Congress but if it were to gain a two thirds majority in both houses, it would be passed regardless. The UK constitution is parliamentary where the executive is derived from parliament.

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten constitution in the UK?

    people believe that even though our unwritten constitution is supposed to be traditional, the running of the country at present does not coincide with the laws that were made hundreds of years ago, as they are simply out of date and not applicable to today's society.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Article 2 pays particular attention in defining the powers of the President. A monarch situation was undoubtedly unacceptable; therefore the powers of the President could only be used with consent of usually the legislature. Again with respect to Checks and Balances, the President's powers in comparison to the other branches

  1. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    The polarised system in the USA means that Democrats and Republicans almost never agree and Democrats and Democrats rarely agree. The role of party leader in the US is seen to be that of the congressional leader not the President (who is seen more as a national figurehead)

  2. Do the strengths of the Constitution outweigh the weaknesses?

    all citizens are equal, and that it is merely the fault of government for such an inequality, but again, this raises questions regarding the interpretive nature of the document, and how it can be manipulated away from its intent. Another example of this issue arises from a recent example where

  1. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Pocket Veto The President can indirectly veto a bill. The U.S. Constitution requires the President to sign or veto any legislation placed on his desk within ten days the United States Congress is in session. If the President does not sign the bill within the required time period, the bill becomes law by default.

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    They are the first 10 amendments to the constitution, ratified by the states in 1791, and are guaranteed constitutional rights, entrenched in the constitution[24]. Although called the Bill of Rights, these 10 amendments are essentially a ?bill of limits?, because the amendments limit the powers of the national government over the rights and liberties of individuals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work