Has British Politics been Europeanised

Authors Avatar

Has British Politics been Europeanised?

Before directly addressing the question it is necessary to define the main concept, Europeanisation.  Europeanisation is an analytical concept which is used to “…examine the changes in domestic structures and policies that occur in response to policies and practices institutionalised at the European level.”  It is believed to be the interrelationships between the other states and the process in which “…European rules, mechanisms and collective understandings interact with given domestic structures.”  This clearly illustrates that ‘Europeanisation’ is a gradual process, rather than a dramatic evolution.

There has been much debate about whether the British political system has been Europeanised, and whether it has merged merely into a European political system, rather than maintaining its own stance as a British political system.  As a result, the former political parties that stand today have differing views on this topic.  Furthermore, internationalists and nationalists also maintain differing views.  Internationalists see Britain as an active but in no way a dominant partner in the European institution.  On the other hand, nationalists see Britain as an independent political and economic phenomenon in a global economy.

The essay will initially discuss the factors that have led to the British political system being ‘Europeanised’, and then it will give arguments for and against, and finally concluding the extent of this integration, if any at all.

There are three reasons in particular, which results in the British Political system treating Europe in a delicate and respectable manner, and furthermore holding it in high regards.  

The first factor and arguably the most influential that will be taken into consideration, is Britain’s membership of the European Union.  “By the 1990s, British Politics were increasingly dominated by the question of the European Union.”  The European Union is one of the core influences that have led to this integration.  The composition of the European Union was the result of two world wars that took place due to the rivalry between three European nations.  Therefore, the sole reason for its composition was to resolve the key problems, which is to avoid further conflict in Europe, and the inability of France and Germany to live in harmony.  

Initially Britain was sceptical about joining the Union, as it set out minimum working conditions, and the Conservative Party at the time saw this as jeopardising “…British economic competitiveness, which was based on work flexibility and low wages.” Furthermore, they argue that “…British industry and finance will be constrained by European regulations…” However, on the other hand “Labour agreed with other member states in interpreting the opt-out as an attempt to turn Britain into the sweatshop of Europe.”  While one party felt that membership would be beneficial to British politics, the other held opposing views.

The first step that was taken of merging European countries together was the integration of the economic industries, such as steel and coal.  These particular industries were targeted, as they were at the time the basis of industrial and military power.  The fundamental intention of this integration was to make it difficult for any “…single nations to build a separate military capacity such as had led Germany to the aggressive military policies that had produced war in 1939.” This illustrates the idea that the European Union reduces the autonomy of countries and furthermore, interferes with the governing of the countries.  This consequently results in European countries adjusting their governing system to suit the European Union, and therefore, resulting in them becoming ‘Europeanised’.

The rules and regulations that are undertaken by other institutions in the European Union largely influence the ones in the British Political system, and the majority of the times they are taken on board.  Consequently, the governing of Britain is not merely the result of the party in power at the time, and the British citizens, but also the system of the European Union and its citizens.  This can arguably be seen as a good thing as it provides the British system with an additional institution, which provides further checks and balances on the system.  However, problems can possibly arise, as the British system cannot govern completely independently.  Furthermore, there may be conflict of opinion amongst the institutions, due to differing traditions, values and beliefs.  On the contrary, “…European bodies could now legislate for Britain independently of the government and even against its expressed wishes showed that national sovereignty was being eroded.”

Join now!

The second factor is with regards to resources.  There is much questioning where resources get allocated and who decides how these resources are distributed.  In the British Political system resource allocation is becoming increasingly a European matter.  The system is one of give and take, which means that Britain pay a large sum to the budget if the European Union, and in return Britain receive large amounts annually in subsidies and grants.  

Finally, the European Union is highly prestigious on a global spectrum as it plays the fundamental role in resource allocation and distribution; therefore, the British ...

This is a preview of the whole essay