• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 123 Agreement Between U.S. and Russia on Nuclear Waste Disposal. Recently the Russian-American relationship has been strengthened by a legally binding document the 123 Agreement, which came into force in January 2011 and contained information abou

Extracts from this document...


The 123 Agreement Between U.S. and Russia on Nuclear Waste Wisposal Recently the Russian-American relationship has been strengthened by a legally binding document - the 123 Agreement, which came into force in January 2011 and contained information about "reprocessing" of the US nuclear waste on the Russian territory (WRP 2011). The 123 Agreement was officially produced and discussed back in 2008, during the G-8 Summit meeting between the former President of the United States, George W. Bush and the Prime-Minister of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin. The parties agreed that the 123 Agreement was the best possible way to encounter and solve the issue of large aggregations of the nuclear waste of America that have been temporarily stored without any progress on the Yucca mountain repository construction (WRP 2011). The issue of nuclear waste and nuclear energy as a concept has been addressed and criticized many times from the sustainable development point of view, questioning the ability to develop and consume the available resources without jeopardizing the future generations' ability to use those resources in the same manner, i.e. not exceeding the ability of nature to replenish those resources (UN, Our Common Future 1987). Also the idea of sustainable development implies that the future generations will face a clean environment and will not have to face the challenges of survival based on the issues neglected by the preceeding generations, such as nuclear waste. ...read more.


However, Russian Federation seems to be less concerned about potential sustainability implications that might result from this pact. Although this country will get an enormous economic benefit from presenting "nuclear waste services" to the US, it also has to invest into further reprocessing research and development (R&D) and redo most of the environmental impact assessments in order to establish more functional repositories for the US nuclear waste. Given that most of the heavy industries used to be kept in secrecy from general knowledge during the Soviet Union, today people are aware only of a couple of functioning repositories, for example the one close to the town of Krasnoyark in Siberia. Today secrecy is still there due to the terorrism alert and local populations do not have any access to the nuclear waste information. They also cannot influence governmental decisions that are made today, which goes against the Rio Declaration principle #10 and Agenda 21 that regard nuclear waste management and consequent responsibilities towards the human population and environment affected (Banks 2003; Stec 2010; UNDESA 2009; UNEP 1992). Thus, there is an issue of public awareness, transparency and inability to express general disagreement with the governmental decision making processes. However, the international 123 Agreement between Russia and US complies with the PPP (Rio Declaration, Principle 16) ...read more.


Yet, it is important to remember about the transparency issue that goes alond with this country and possible corruption associated with such a large international transaction. The government will also greatly benefit from receiving an opportunity to advertize its new option as a "reprosessing-nuclear waste storing land" to the world and eventually attract more "customer countries" to store their waste in growing nuclear repositories. Russia will have to look into all of the sustainability issues associated with this international deal such as public participation and associated level of transparency, storing methods and expansion of nuclear facilities, international standards and impact assessments on already existing and future repositories, as well as corruption factor that is the largest obstacle on a way to a sustainable future of the country (WRP 2011). Finally, as for the resolution of this sustainability issue, it is relatively pointless to speak about termination of the whole Agreement. The best case scenario will involve the top-bottom regulation, where the Russian government will enforce strict measures of control on the performance of nuclear waste repositories and reprosessing reactors. Additionally, the US government could potentially invest into controlling measures by establishing its own assessment of Russian performance in accordance with the 123 Agreement conditions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Environmental & Physical Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Environmental & Physical Geography essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Environmental degradation is neither the inevitable price of, nor a desirable path for, economic ...

    5 star(s)

    As a result, there exists a catch 22 scenario, where a trap begins to form between poverty and environmental degradation, with little chance of escape. Adams (1990) argues that: "This linkage between poverty and environmental degradation provides perhaps the clearest demonstration of the centrality of social, political and economic issues in questions of environment and development.

  2. Environmental Management. The London smog of 1952 is one of history's most important ...

    Only an extremely severe influenza epidemic could account for the majority of the excess deaths for this period. Such an epidemic would be along the order of twice the normal case-fatality rate and quadruple the incidence observed in 1953. These results reveal that even if the estimates of the number

  1. Critically evaluate the role and effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment in ensuring environmentally sound ...

    indeed EIA practice in UK, does have an effect in shaping a project. Jones and Wood (1997) conducted a study using 40 EIA cases throughout the UK to find out how EIA affected planning decisions. The cases covered time periods from 1988-1994.Also, the cases selected for the study were gathered

  2. This Community Research Project is aimed at examining Barangay Nazareths waste management system in ...

    In addition, people living under poor circumstances are also directly dependent on their close natural environment for their daily survival. Management of waste can involve many things. It encompasses collecting waste material and processing it in some way, or trying to recycle it.

  1. Disposal of Toxic and Radioactive Materials with Special Focus on the Philippines

    The primary goal in taking care of and getting rid of radioactive (or other) waste materials is to safeguard individuals and also the natural environment. This implies isolating and diluting the waste materials so the rate or amount of any radionuclides taken back to the biosphere is undamaging.

  2. Should humans should be responsible for preserving endangered species and natural resources?

    On the other hand if it is endangered because of its inability to survive against the competition of its natural habitat, then we have no right to interfere. ?Survival of the fittest? is a natural concept and has been occurring long before we evolved.

  1. Systematically review and critically evaluate the current protection measures available for nature conservation in ...

    The UK currently has more than 10,000 protected areas (Gaston et al, 2006). Non-governmental agencies (NGOs) are very important in the management of the protected areas. Organisations such as the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), the Woodland Trust and the Wildlife trust, collectively manage more than 3500 protected areas (Gaston et al, 2006).

  2. Analysis of the documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle".

    There is some validity to the argument that a consensus needs to be questioned. In an issue of this magnitude, with this level of scientific uncertainty, popular representation of doubt is justified, even important. The film has reason to claim that the media is overblowing the threat of climate change,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work