Discursive essay on evolution.
Discursive essay on evolution The argument of whether or not evolution has occurred and still is occurring is a very controversial issue. Those who don't believe in it tend to take a religious perspective and believe that the world and everything in it was made by a "Creator", and those who believe in the theory of evolution generally do so upon grounds of scientific evidence. Evolution is a very complicated issue. There is what is known as micro-evolution, which is known as adaptation, there are slight variations in the species, but at any stage during the process it is still a member of the same family and species. This is known to be true, what the argument is about is macro-evolution. Macro-evolution is on a much bigger scale, For example, from a fish to a dog. Evolutionists believe that if micro-evolution can occur why can't it go further and change the species altogether. The "father" of evolution was a man called Charles Darwin. Around 150 years ago, he shocked the world when he wrote a book suggesting that humans were related to animals. Today, Darwin's idea still forms the basis of what is known as "The Theory of Evolution". The word "evolution", is used to describe the way in which living thing evolve or change, given time. The theory is comprised of three major sections. The first of which is called variation. All living things vary in size, shape, strength and
The View of Evolution
Jessica M. Bird Ms. Castro Research Assignment Three English 101 The View of Evolution Evolution has been the debate for century. A lot religious groups are very against it, but those who are not religious tend believe it. Everyone on the earth wants to know how we came to be, religious or not. Many different views have came up in the past view years on the controversial subject. How do people know who is right? Are the views they're getting the right ones? http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evolution-vs-creation.htm. Allaboutcreations.org. 2002. Web. October 30, 2009 This particular site focuses on the debate on Evolution Vs. Creation. Allaboutcreations.org gives both sides of this huge debate. They really want their readers to know both sides before they can form an opinion. The author tries to tell both sides of the debate but seems to be partial towards evolution. He explains they cannot test creation because the creator cannot be tested (this is were faith comes in). There for creation cannot be scientifically proven. The site doesn't have any links at all. It seems to be like an essay and has different sections of the debate. It is also not a good source if an individual wants an unbiased one. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/. WGBH/NOVA Science Unit and Clear Blue Sky Productions. 2001. Web. October 30, 2009 Pbs.org as a evolution section within
In society today, how can the Creation and the Evolution theory coexist?
Manon Mollard MP5a 18.04.05 Biology: One World Assignment In society today, how can the Creation and the Evolution theory coexist? In the film 'Inherit the Wind', there was a clear distinction made between Creationism and Darwinism, even though Henry Drummond, the defending lawyer, tried to show one theory did not necessarily contradict the other one. What are these theories exactly about, and how can they coexist in today's society? According to www.thefreedictionary.com, Creationism can be defined as 'the belief that God created the Earth in exactly the way and timeframe described in the biblical book of Genesis'. According to www.thefreedictionary.com, the theory of Evolution can be defined as 'the belief that the current structure and diversity of life came into being purely through the naturalistic process of variation and natural selection, without the intervention of any deity'. These two theories do not seem compatible. On one hand, the creationist view affirms God created heaven and the Earth and human fully formed on it in 6 days, with no previous related species. On the other hand, scientific evidence shows that the Earth was formed 4.5 billion years ago and the first humans date back only a hundred thousand years or so. Also, the father of Evolution, Charles Darwin,
Evolution V teleological Argument
The evolution argument goes against the existence on God claiming the existence of the universe and everything within was because of evolution derived from Charles Darwin's Theory of evolution. It is also supported by followers of Richard Dawkins. Religious believers are of the teleological argument and believe that God created the universe and everything in it but this is much open to criticisms evolution believers as they argue there is no proof for the existence of God and they argue that where did God come from and who made God? Teleological believers argue that God was necessary has all ways been there and the universe is contingent. Philosopher William Paeley made analogy to the human systems and a watch. He describes the features of a watch to be of extreme complexity and sophistication argues that it could not have just been accidentally or by luck created therefore it must have hade a designer who created it. This is the same for a body part like the human eye features such as the iris, cornea, retina and pupil are very complex and unlikely to have evolved and just happened to have ended how they are by chance, therefore William Paeley enforces there must have been an intelligent designer who designed this and this must have been God. Furthermore supporters of the teleological argument disagree with the design argument disagree with the evolution argument as it
The Evolution of Punishment.
The Evolution of Punishment "Durkheim (1858-1917) is widely regarded as one of the 'founding fathers' of sociology and was a leading light among the Année Sociologique group" 1 Durkheim wrote about different varieties of topics but based his main issue on the nature of social order and social solidarity. Law and crime was seen as a main term to reveal development of the solidarity in society. The developments of different forms of punishment are discussed in this essay. Durkheim identified 'two laws' ) The Law of Quantitative Change The intensity of punishment is the greater the more closely societies approximate to a less developed type - and the more the central power assumes an absolute character.2 2) The Law of Qualitative Change Deprivations of liberty, and of liberty alone, varying in time according to the seriousness of the crime, tend to become more and more the normal means of social control. 3 Whether one social type is more advanced than another it has only to be seen if it is more complex or more organised. The societies are found at different levels and in these social conditions one looks at this as a general evolution of societies. A government is usually based in an extremely complex society and does not posses an absolutist character, as it is not linked with any social type. 'In a very large number of ancient societies death pure and
What is the evidence for evolution?
In 1800’s Darwin came up with his theory of natural selection. Natural selection is when desired characteristics were passed on the future generations naturally, through their genes. Any variation that improves the animal’s ability to survive and reproduce will tend to be passed on to the next generation. Some evidence that Dawin used to support his theory was the fossils of animals that showed how they had evolved over a period of time. The fossils can be dated by looking at the rock they were found inside and finding the age. He also used the Galapagos finches, when he went to South America to study these finches he saw how they had evolved. Darwin noticed that some of the finch’s beaks had adapted so they could eat large seeds, however some had parrot-like beaks for feeding on fruits, and others had slender beaks for feeding on small insects. Soon Darwin spotted that the different finches looked like they were similar to original finch and He then became aware of the fact that the finches had descended from them. Darwin’s theory was not accepted at the time because it disagreed with the religious view, that god made everything. People still believed that everyone descended from Adam and Eve. At the time Darwin didn’t have enough evidence to convince the other scientists of his time. Although later on more proof has been found to support Darwin theory of natural
Evolution and development of the periodic table.
Evolution and development of the periodic table: First efforts to classify elements came in the publication 'Traité Elémentaire de Chimie' (Treatise on the Chemical Elements), published in 1789 by Antoine Lavoisier3. The 33 known Elements were separated as gases, metals, non-metals and earths. In the 19th century elemental discovery led to further efforts, with valency being a favoured sorting method. However, Döbereiner was first to sort elements by their weight/mass. He arranged elements to fit triads of similar properties, but also mass - each middle element had a weight equal to the average of the first and third. British chemist, Newlands, in 1863 formed the 'law of octaves' - every eighth element had similar properties. Newlands table, hindered by the noble gases remaining elusive - lacked organisation with elements sharing spaces, due also to inaccurate mass measurement1. The next major effort came from Dimitri Mendeleev helped by Stanislao Canizzaro, who, in 1958 clarified mass numbers for 65 known elements, allowing Mendeleev to arrange them into rows according to mass and columns of similar valency. This corresponded with Lavoisier's division of metals and non-metals, showing the evolution of the modern table. Mendeleev predicted 5 additional undiscovered elements with accurate properties. Among predicted elements was Gallium, which was discovered
Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism
Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism Introduction Evolution refers to the processes that have transformed life on Earth from its earliest forms to the vast diversity that characterizes today. <Ref.1 - p414> Up until eighteenth century, biology in Europe and America was dominated by natural theology. <Ref.1 - p415> People believed that a supernatural being like God created each and every species as it is now for a particular purpose, at a particular time. However there are differences in people's interpretation of the length of the "day" mentioned in Genesis. Some Christians believe that the day was of 24hours and the world was created in 6 days. In 1650AD, Archbishop Ussher of Armagh calculated that God, created the world in October 4004BC, beginning on October the 1st and finishing with Man at 9:00am, which is not possible as we have no, archaeological evidence that suggest that a civilised life was already established in the Middle East by then. <Ref.2 - p879> Alternatively, there was the theory of spontaneous generation. A number of Greek philosophers believed in he gradual evolution of life. Amongst those philosophers, Plato (427BC-347BC) and Aristotle (384BC-322BC) influenced the western cultures the most. Plato believed in two worlds: a real world that is ideal and eternal, and illusory world of imperfection that perceive through our senses. He believed that
Charles Darwin, The evolution theory.
Charles Darwin The evolution theory Charles Darwin's theory of evolution centres on the idea that species compete to survive, and those favorable characteristics are passed on from one generation to the next. Darwin said that evolution took place by a process of natural selection or survival of the fittest. This meant that the animals and plants best suited to their surroundings survived and were able to pass on their genes to their offspring. The ones that weren't best suited died off and didn't get the chance to reproduce. Animals and plants had to change or evolve due to environmental pressures. Over millions of years the conditions on the Earth have changed tremendously, the environmental conditions we have now are very different. If organisms hadn't adapted or changed to live in those changing conditions we would have no life on Earth. Those organisms that had the characteristics, which allowed them to survive, as food became scarce or the temperature got colder or warmer were able to survive and pass on the characteristics to the next generation. In any generation there are a variety of characteristics e.g. taller, shorter, run faster, stronger etc and these may give an evolutionary advantage. Darwin noted four things from his observations: . All organisms produce an abundance of offspring, many more than is necessary 2. There is a fairly constant population size
The Evolution of Human Resource Management
Introduction In recent years, organisations have come under increasing pressure to change. Much of this pressure has stemmed from changes in the economic environment, such as increasing international competitions, slower growth and, in some cases, declining markets, thereby these force companies to cut costs, lower prices and achieve dramatic improvements in productivity (Sparow and Hiltrop, 1997). More and more organisations have started to focus on the added value of people, processes and structures. This new competitive reality faced by organisations calls on different capabilities. However, which kind of the human resource management has value in the modern organisations? Phelps pointed out the answer is only the human resource actions which contribute to the achievement of its goals. Nevertheless, if the HR actions are not helpful to the organisations, are they useless? In this paper, two parts will be discussed. Firstly, the HR actions do contribute to the achievement of the goals; secondly, the HR actions do not contribute to the achievement of its goals. The full arguments are stated below. The Evolution of Human Resource Management Schuler and Jackson (1999) described the evolution from personnel management as a two-phased transformation, the first is from personnel management to HRM, and the second is from HRM to strategic HRM. Human Resource Management theory is
