Can Military Intervention Be Justified?
Assignment for Term One International Relations Can Military Intervention Be Justified? Index * Introduction............................................ page 4 to 4 * Can Military Intervention Ever Be Justified?... page 5 to 9 * Conclusion..............................................page 10 to 10 * Bibliography............................................page 11 to 11 * Work Made By........................................ page 12 to 12 Introduction In this assignment, I will try to answer if the military intervention in other countries can ever be justified. For that, I will start to explain what military intervention is, with some quotes from encyclopaedias. Afterwards I will explain why some military interventions were so important (and where) as well as, what distinguish Humanitarianism from Force. For the conclusion, I will answer directly to the question of this essay giving my own opinion in this field. I have a few quotes from authors that written about this theme, as well as quotes from encyclopaedias, which names can be found in the bibliography. Can Military Intervention Ever Be Justified? What is Military Intervention? A generation ago, the terms "military intervention" and "conflict resolution" would almost never have been pronounced in the same breath. The field of conflict resolution has its roots in the peace movements in the 20th century, most
Could war have been avoided in July 1914?
HISTORY 239: EUROPE 1900-1945 Jeremy Bradshaw Student No. 0258568 Tutor: Dr Andrew Conway Essay One: Due 5pm Friday April 4 Could war have been avoided in July 1914? One of the greatest tragedies of the cataclysmic event that was war in 1914 was that it could have been avoided. The war itself was to have a profound effect on the World as we now know it. It was responsible for the demise of powers such as Germany and Austria-Hungary, for revolution in Russia and the emergence of a new force on the world stage, America. More directly, it was responsible for the loss of almost an entire generation, with over nine million people killed. It has been proposed that this event was inevitable, that it was only a matter of time before tensions in central Europe, due to the Balkans, militarism, imperialism and secret diplomacy, exploded into full-blown conflict. This essay will argue that this was far from the case, and that the conflict could well have been avoided at many key times before the point of no return was reached. Issues to be discussed include an increasing use of diplomacy, a growing feeling of anti-militarism in the general population and the growth of peace movements and the actions of Austria-Hungary regarding Serbia. These issues in particular will be analysed to show that this horrific event could have been avoided. The years prior to conflict in 1914
This essay will use the article In New Tactic, Militants Burn Houses in Iraq from the New York Times, to demonstrate the application of different definitions of politics, pertaining to the war on terrorism.
Politics can be interpreted in so many ways and its definitions are plenty. What may be politics of our government can also be the same politics in our homes, schools, social circles, etc. This essay will use the article 'In New Tactic, Militants Burn Houses in Iraq' from the New York Times, to demonstrate the application of different definitions of politics, pertaining to the war on terrorism. It will assess the article's informativeness; particularly its background information on the issue, the identities involved, and the issue's significance to countries. It will then identify the article's strengths and weaknesses in helping people form opinions on the war on terrorism. The article starts with Cave reporting Iraq's civil war, where Sunni militants burned homes to intimidate Shiite pilgrims, demonstrating a definition of politics as "an activity aimed at achieving advantage over others in a particular group" (Times-Chambers Dictionary, 1997). The ploy to achieve higher authority over others also demonstrates Lasswell's definition of politics: "who gets what, when, how" (Tansey, 1995). Considering a more inclusive explanation of politics is also useful. The Islamic conflict, which according to Ghosh is actually 'a fight for political domination' (Ghosh, 2007), demonstrates Leftwich's understanding that politics is in this case, is conflict that not only exists in the
The powers granted to the presidency fall under two categories: the head of state and the head or government or foreign and domestic. Each to these categories is divided into three parts each.
Fallon Brown POS 2301 Dr. Shah 0 December 2002 The powers granted to the presidency fall under two categories: the head of state and the head or government or foreign and domestic. Each to these categories is divided into three parts each. The real power of the presidency comes when these powers are put together, but they're easier to understand when broken down. With all the powers given to the President, it is possible for them to take on imperial qualities although the system of checks and balances is put into place. The position of the president as the head of state has three parts to it. All of the parts are provided under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. The first part is military. The president is the commander in chief of the national military and the state National Guard units. This means he is the highest military authority in the United States. He is also the head of the secret intelligence network, which means organizations such as the FBI, CIA, and many more that are known and unknown to the public. The president doesn't hold all power concerned with military because in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution, seven powers are devoted to the aspects of control that Congress has over the military. Presidents in the past have tried step over or mislead Congress. President Johnson mislead Congress in the Vietnam war and they retaliated by
Have european political partiea adopted American electoral techniques?
Have european political partiea adopted American electoral techniques? To fully understand the American techniques of marketing and communication we must first look at the process of elections in the USA and how they are conducted. It is also relevant to consider the historical base from which this system has grown and to then equate that with political parties in Europe. `" No nation in the world has as many elections as the USA". Over half a million posts are filled in presidential years and over one million in an election cycle, anything from school and county boards to the President himself. The USA also has state referendums on local issues but we are interested in the presidential race as this magnifies the marketing in elections. Electioneering begins in earnest in January of the election year when candidates from the two main parties, Republicans and Democrats, put themselves forward for nomination. We shall look at this in more detail later. February starts the primaries in which states vote on who they wish to become their candidate for the White-House. These primaries continue up to July but are not held in every state and in the states where they are conducted they have different systems of voting. They can be either open, anybody who wants may vote in a primary, or closed so that only party members can vote. These primaries are of key importance to funding as
The recent US led invasion of Iraq without any United Nation's mandate clearly demonstrates, and will be proved in the course of the essay, that at least so far as international law is concerned, might is synonymous to right.
The recent US led invasion of Iraq without any United Nation's mandate clearly demonstrates, and will be proved in the course of the essay, that at least so far as international law is concerned, might is synonymous to right. This essay shall first demonstrate as to how the US-led war against Iraq can be debated as an illegal war and how did the attacking States violate the United Nations Charter and other international treaties and institutions. The relevant features of the Charter have been used to make the foundation of a legal argument. Secondly, it will highlight the adverse impact on the 'Rule of Law'. It will then show how the 'rule of fist' is proving to be the governing factor in international law and how it sets itself as a unilateralist approach for conducting various external affairs. The preamble of the United Nations Charter expresses a determination 'to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war', 'to practise tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours', 'to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security', and to ensure 'that armed forces shall not be used, save in the common interest'. This charter provides the guidelines to the use of force in international law. Any state which considers using force against another State with the aim of restoring international peace and obtaining adherence to
What difficulties are there in integrating Europe?
What difficulties are there in integrating 'Europe'? This essay will try to explain the uncontested process of European integration pointing out the difficulties involved. In order to answer this question it is important to distinguish between the different dimensions of European identity as well as to establish what exactly we mean by the term 'Europe'. Looking critically at the term basic distinctions can be drawn between three totally different conceptions where each of these usages has its own complications, contradictions and divisions. These involve ideas of Europe as a geographical entity, Europe as a sequence of ideas and Europe as a project. The first use of the term seems to be simple as the idea of a stretch of land that covers from the Atlantic through to the Ural Mountains that constitutes a geographical entity called' Europe'. Firstly Britain, Ireland or Malta are islands that exist off the coastline of mainland Europe, but form part of it. Secondly, we have the question of the inclusion of the transcaucasian countries like Armenia or Georgia. The second use of the term refers to 'Europe' as a sequence of ideas, a system of values or beliefs that characterise what Europe is all about socially, culturally and politically. It emphasises things from the aspect of religion by focusing on Christendom, or analyse it from the political point of view for example
What Do the Terms 'State', 'Nation', and 'Nation-State' Mean and Which of These Do You Feel is the Most Important Within the Current International System
What Do the Terms 'State', 'Nation', and 'Nation-State' Mean and Which of These Do You Feel is the Most Important Within the Current International System? The terms state, nation and nation-state are all terms that academics, political commentators, politicians and a variety of other groups use to refer to the way the international system works, and what entities operate within it. Many subjects within the social sciences are widely debated but there seems to be a consensus on what these terms mean. To understand these terms and how they operate a brief explanation or evaluation of what the international system is, is required. According to Evans and Newnham, the international system can be two things: a description and a level of analysis. The international system also encompasses another concept, 'international order' (Evans & Newnham, 1998). Those who believe or, indeed, endorse the theory of international order recognise 'regulating elements' in the international system. Examples of regulating elements are: the Balance of Power, diplomacy and international law. Taking these factors into account a framework for interaction is established and the international system can function (Evans & Newnham, 1998). As a description, the international system is supposedly based on a state-system, what a state is will be explored later on in this essay. The international system
Die Zollvorlage ist die wirtschaftspolitische, die Zuchthausvorlage die...
Die Zollvorlage ist die wirtschaftspolitische, die Zuchthausvorlage die... Kehr here claims that major changes in all of the major political spheres can be attributed to the Sammlungspolitik. The toll laws were an economic aspect of the politik, the penitentiary bill was a social aspect, the second Navy law a power political aspect and the general xenophobia towards Britain and Russia was a foreign policy aspect. The Sammlungspolitik theory sees the conflict and eventual alliance of the agrarians and of the industrialists as being the dominant factor in German politics; both internal and external. The coalition of the two parties would demand governmental patronage and dictate many of the state's actions by their influence either in the Reichstag, at the court or at the ballot box. The penitentiary bill was a response to the need for a comprehensive means of suppression of the proletariat - another feature of the Sammlungspolitik. The fear of Britain and Russia was a result of fear of the industrial British way of life and the Russian grain hoards on the part of the agrarians, whilst the industrialists fared the Russian autocracy and the competition posed by the British. This Englandhass had its expression in part in the fleet building programmes, designed to allow the Germans to compete with Britain as a Weltmacht. The failure not to recognise the gravity of the
What new theoretical challenges rose to the fore international relations in recent years? E.g. gender, green, postmodernism and how do they challenge the realist view of international relations.
What new theoretical challenges rose to the fore international relations in recent years? E.g. gender, green, postmodernism and how do they challenge the realist view of international relations The importance of gender: Feminist scholars argue that gender matters in understanding how international relations work. Especially when it comes to issues such as: war and international security. In addition feminist scholars often reveal the hidden assumptions in how we study international relations and argue that what scholars usually claim to be universal often turns out to be true only for males. Feminists have argued that the core assumption of realism especially anarchy and sovereignty reflect the ways in which males tend to interact and to see the world. This is somewhat a complex critique, as vast majority of heads of state, of diplomats, and of soldiers are males therefore it does make sense to study them as males. In addition feminists argue that traditional male actors in IR can be better understood by analyzing how their gender affects their views and decision making processes. They suggest that females also influence IR and such influences are usually ignored by realists. According to the feminist assumptions males fight wars and run states, whereas females are basically
