and low frequency lexis (?emblem?, ?horizon?, ?isolation?). As can be seen in ?Love Songs in Age?, Larkin deliberately uses a mix of formal and informal lexis, with the intention to reflect the supposed intimacy in the act of ?talking in bed?, but highlighting instead the abstract nature of time and the reality of love as time erodes the relationship depicted in the poem. ?Talking in Bed? is presented in a resigned tone, thus creating a mood of despair. This is established through the use of the modal verb ?ought to be? to express the couple?s discontent, implying from the beginning of the poem, that ?talking in bed? is not all that it should be.
Word count:
3319
Conclusion analysis
Good conclusions usually refer back to the question or title and address it directly - for example by using key words from the title.
How well do you think these conclusions address the title or question? Answering these questions should help you find out.
Do they use key words from the title or question?
Do they answer the question directly?
Can you work out the question or title just by reading the conclusion?
"In conclusion, the authors of both A Clockwork Orange - Anthony Burgess - and Frankenstein - Mary Shelley have don e well in concealing the ideas of an outcast in their novels, using the actions of the characters and knowledge of systematic psychological and sociological emotions the ideas of an outcast in the novels were unveiled."
"In conclusion the past in both 1984 and HMT are represented through dreams and flashbacks for both the main characters. This representation is seen constantly throughout the novel and we are reminded that the past holds memories, however minor, for both characters. Both Winston and Offred have lost the past and seem unable to get it back, even though they long for it."
"In conclusion, Shakespeare primarily focuses on creating contrasts between Edgar and Edmund opposed to similarities between the two characters. However one striking similarity does arise. Shakespeare chose to names the brothers Edgar and Edmund; the names are very alike, which is unexpected when their characters differ so greatly. This may be Shakespeare's way of explaining how difficult it is to distinguish between good and evil. The most important contrast he presents is how the two characters represent good or evil. In performance, the colours each of the characters wear reveal the distinct contrast between Edmund and Edgar. This is specifically shown in the battle between the two brothers at the end of the play. Edgar wears white to suggest innocence and goodness and Edmund wears dark colours, which represent evil and sin. The colours symbolise their mental attitudes and personalities. Edmund is presented as a cold malevolent character while Edmund is shown as a trustworthy and loyal who is devastated by losing his family and livelihood. However, it is Edgar who represents morality and is one of the few characters who survives the play, in consequence, presenting the legendary moral that good will always defeat evil.
Approx"
Marked by a teacher
This document has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read
the full teachers notes when you download the document.
Peer reviewed
This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay
reviewing squad. Read the full review on the document page.
Peer reviewed
This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student document
reviewing squad. Read the full review under the document preview on this page.