Democracy of Uganda
Democracy of Uganda By: JN de Vos Contents Page . Introduction 3 2. Measuring a Legitimate Democracy 3 3. Background 4 4. Musuveni's Reforms 5 5. The Ugandan Democracy 7 6. Conclusion 9 7. Bibliography 10 Introduction In 1986 President Yoweri Museveni and his National Resistance Army (NRA) seized political power in Uganda after five years of guerrilla warfare. Museveni's National Resistance Movement (NRM), of which the NRA was part, introduced a transition period and established the National Resistance Council (NRC) to govern. During this transition period a ban on political activity was formalised and a no-party democracy was introduced. Twenty two years later in 2008 Museveni is still the president of Uganda (after being elected by a land slide victory in 2006) and persists with the movement system which has given stability to Uganda and its people. This is essay will evaluate the democratic legitimacy of the Museveni regime in Uganda. Measuring a Legitimate Democracy The origins of the word democracy can be traced back to ancient Greece and literally means a rule by the people, but due to the frequent use of this word its true meaning as a political concept has been jeopardized. Democracy can be seen as a set of practices and principles that institutionalize and ultimately protect
"The Global Institutions of Globalization"
"The Global Institutions of Globalization" Introduction The basis of this written assignment considers the impact, for good or ill, which two global institutions, the IMF and Group of Seven/Group of Eight have had on globalization in recent times. The first section of the paper analyzes what I believe to be Joseph E. Stiglitz's three key arguments in the book, Globalization and its Discontents. The history of the Group of Seven/Group of Eight, its role, significance and the means of how this organization influences globalization economically, socially and environmentally are all addressed in the section half of this paper. Book Review The core of the book, "Globalization and its Discontents," is a closely argued condemnation of the IMF for multiple crimes including, but not limited to, the financial downgrade of the beggaring of Russia and the 1997 East Asia crisis. The argument that many of the economic ills of the past fifteen years can be traced back to powerful forces of the IMF, the Western financial community and U.S treasury are consistently sawed out throughout the book. Delving into the heart of the major crises of capitalism in recent times clearly reveals how the IMF appallingly mismanaged each case, demonstrating their lack of reform. Stiglitz also uncovers the hidden agenda behind the IMF as he strongly depicts the structural problems with global financial
Heidegger and Nazism
'Given his philosophical beliefs, it was inevitable that Heidegger would embrace Nazism' DISCUSS Introduction Martin Heidegger has been regarded by many as one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century. His international reputation was assured with the publication in 1927 of Being and Time, a book that was characterized by the young Jurgen Habermas, one of his students, as 'the most significant philosophical event since Hegel's Phänomenologie [..]'1 Heidegger's philosophy has been haunted by his support for the Nazi movement for over fifty years, and has since 1945 been discussed from various points of view. At the centre of this discussion has been, for the most part, his infamous 1933 Rectoral address at the University of Freiburgh and his refusal to publicly renounce his Nazi past has caused many to disclaim his philosophy as 'essentially fascist and serving as Nazism's philosophical justification.'2 Does the fact that he backed the Nazi movement mean that his philosophy was also to some extent fascistic? In fact, was his philosophy the reason for him to embrace Nazism? Some philosophers, such as Habermas, claim that his support for the Nazi party arose from his philosophical conceptions. Many others disagree with this, and 'treat Heidegger's philosophy as a pure act of thought that developed in a political vacuum, or explain his political "error" as a
Human rights and International Law. This work will briefly analyze how questionable human rights records of both Brazil and North Korea have recently impacted their relations with other sovereign countries.
Human Rights and International Law It is widely accepted, that the leaders of sovereign nations may govern their subjects in any fashion that they deem appropriate. Nonetheless, these domestic decisions often have far reaching international consequences. This work will briefly analyze how questionable human rights records of both Brazil and North Korea have recently impacted their relations with other sovereign countries. For the better part of five years, the world has been captivated by the media circus generated around the child custody battle involving David Goldman and his nine year old son Sean Goldman. The conflict began in 2004, when Bruna Bianchi, the child's mother, left for a two week vacation in Brazil. However once in Brazil, Bianchi never returned and eventually was granted a divorce by a Brazilian court. The father then began a crusade to reunite with his son by filing multiple law-suits both in American and Brazilian courts. The Brazilian courts initially ruled in favor of Goldman, only to be reversed by Brazilian higher courts. Mr. Goldman received a major break when the New Jersey State Supreme Court ruled that "upon the death of Bianchi, the Widower of Goldman's ex-wife had no recognized standing of custody of the child." The basis of the ruling was predicated largely if not exclusively on the application of The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
"World Government is inevitable." Do you agree? Why? Or why not?
ICP 410 International Relations Theory: Understanding September 11th Course Instructor: John Heathershow Student: Taabaldieva Meerim ICP 100 Essay proposal Due Date: 14 February 2003 "World Government is inevitable." Do you agree? Why? Or why not? The world has never been so integrated as it now. Numerous treaties and document bind countries and make them interdependent. Powerful international organizations like the United Nations, the European Union, NATO, Common Wealth of Independent States etc. have made countries, regions and even continents dependant upon each other in variety of realms. Spillover effect has become a very common phenomenon. Economic corporation has moved on to political, military and cultural. However, this is not where the integration stops. What waits for the world in the future? What kind of a system and how will order be in the global system of corporation? In my essay I am going to discuss these questions. It is very unlikely to see a single World Government, for there are always people who will support corporation and integration in order to achieve stability and benefit for all, and there are always those who seek their own interests, national interests, thus making Global Politics and further world integration a difficult process. I am also going to discuss how will different theories of IR influence this process: the viewpoints of
What small prospects for success would face a society which openly announced its intention of imposing a second imperial tutelage on a newly liberated people?
What small prospects for success would face a society which openly announced its intention of imposing a second imperial tutelage on a newly liberated people? -Mass Communications and American Empire In many respects, the second Bush administration's efforts at information control are too heavy-handed for the late Herbert Schiller's subtle model of mind mold. From Lynne Cheney's American Council of Trustees and Alumni to John Poindexter's Total Information Awareness, '43' makes no bones about a hyper-patriotic process of inculcation in the service of a powerful ruling class. "What is unusual," as a feature article this month in the Connecticut Law Tribune avows, "is the extent to which President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft are the chief cheer-leaders in this movement, equating legitimate dissent with supporting terrorism."1 While Schiller is no longer here to parse current events, he might be surprised at the extent to which the notion of a veritable carpet-bombing of the public consciousness informs today's critical literature. Indications of a political economy at work in the newsroom abound, from outspoken Tom Gutting's dismissal from the Texas Sun within two weeks of 9/11 to Exxon Mobil's withdrawal of support for PBS announced last month2. And Schiller could easily explain the FCC's new quest to regulate the Internet backbone ("so that we can limit any service
With having multiple terms in office now Duncan Hunter, has elevated his status in the House of Representatives
Military Defense and Immigration By Kevin Perez With having multiple terms in office now Duncan Hunter, has elevated his status in the House of Representatives. Before attaining his current position as Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, "Hunter [also] served as Chairman of the House Military Research and Development Subcommittee [as well as] the Military Procurement Subcommittee".1 He was responsible for the management of a great deal of money ranging close to "sixty-billion ($60 billion) dollars".2 Apart from Hunter serving on the Armed Services Committee he is also a member of the House Select Committee on Homeland Security, which is a reason why Hunter's main issues are the military policies and immigration. Hunter pushes legislation to help those involved with the military because he himself was in the military, Hunter is a "Vietnam veteran who served [for the Army branch of the military and was part of the] 173rd Airborne and 75th Army Rangers".3 Hunter represents the fifty-second (52nd) district in the San Diego County in the state of California. Hunter attended Western State University Law School in San Diego where he graduated and began his career as a lawyer. Hunter appealed to the minority vote for the reason that he assisted much of the "Hispanic community free of charge and without government compensation".4 Hunter was smart enough to start making
The power of citizenship is probably best known by those who are denied it. Examine this statement with respect to the experience of Palestinians in Lebanon.
Transfer-Encoding: chunked ‘The power of citizenship is probably best known by those who are denied it.’ Examine this statement with respect to the experience of Palestinians in Lebanon. In 1948 over 100,000 Palestinians fled from Israel to Lebanon following Nakba. In the present day this number has swelled to over 450,000, even more if those undocumented are included (UNWRA, 2015). They occupy over a dozen camps and are make up the biggest user of UNWRA resources. Their swelling numbers has put strain on aid resources whilst also souring their initial warm welcome with locals. Palestinian refugees in Lebanon live in poverty, in a society that discriminates and oppresses them. Citizenship is political tool that could have the power to change their abject position. Citizenship can be defined as “an institution mediating rights between the subjects of politics and the polity to which these subjects belong” (Isin & Nyers, 2014, p. 1). This is a definition of great breadth. The relevant concept within this definition is the rights afforded by citizenship. It is these civil, political and social rights that are denied to many Palestinians in Lebanon (and its resulting ‘power’ for them). For Isin & Nyers the power of citizenship is similar to Arendt’s “right to have rights”. How powerful would citizenship be for Palestinians though? Since 1948 Lebanon has
Rhetorical analysis of a political cartoon depicting President Bushs attitude towards the oil and gas crisis, or lack there of attitude
Rhetorical Analysis Warfare in today’s society is not just a state of affairs spoiled by hate and terror, but a systematic strategy that creates a combined action or operation between individuals by a common principle. The general, comparable to the president of the United States, knows the substance of warfare, relating abstract ideas rather than particulars in order to obtain his “purpose.” In the present day, oil prices remain geopolitical and the United States has no control over the price of oil. I guess you can say the United States is at war when it comes to the price of oil and the problems it presents us on a daily basis. In media and politics today, there is commotion virtually every single day about the price of gasoline and a barrel of crude oil. Many people do not realize with the prosperity of countries such as India and China, and the fact that they are nearly eight times the size of the United States; the demand for the world’s oil supply has increased sufficiently. There are many political cartoons depicting the oil crisis we are in today by using rhetorical tools such as pathos, logos, ethos, and kairos. The cartoonist uses these tools to draw attention from political parties such as left wing liberals to right wing conservatives all the way down to the blue collar American citizen. While the American economy is in a recession, and
The case study of social moblisisation in Latin America that I wish to cover in this critical analysis is that of the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de ColombiaEjrcito del Pueblo or FARC for short
Cian Farrell - 08554544 Critical Analysis of Social Mobilisation in a Latin American Case Study The case study of social moblisisation in Latin America that I wish to cover in this critical analysis is that of the “Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia—Ejército del Pueblo” (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—People’s Army) or FARC for short, located in Colombia. I wish to analyse and critique the FARC in terms of its contributions to positive social mobilisation in Colombia. I will also attempt to address some key questions in the analysis, such as . Have the actions of the FARC helped or hindered those which they seek to represent? 2. Does the FARC still stand for the fundamental ideals it was born from? and finally, . Does the FARC still have a place in modern day Colombia? The FARC are a guerrilla organisation that have been involved in the armed conflicts that have plagued Colombia since 1964. Their origins stem from the peasant struggles of the 1920s and 30s in Colombia. These regional guerrilla peasant groups sprang up in response to harsh working conditions on coffee plantations and the failure of recognition of land tenure of the peasants and indigenous people by the government. These regional groups were heavily involved in the proceeding period of civil unrest in Colombia known as “La Violencia”. This era of violence was sparked by
